Stock market volatility and multi-scale positive and negative bubbles

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Rangan Gupta , Jacobus Nel , Joshua Nielsen , Christian Pierdzioch
{"title":"Stock market volatility and multi-scale positive and negative bubbles","authors":"Rangan Gupta ,&nbsp;Jacobus Nel ,&nbsp;Joshua Nielsen ,&nbsp;Christian Pierdzioch","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2024.102300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study whether booms and busts in the stock market of the United States (US) drives its volatility. Given this, first, we employ the Multi-Scale Log-Periodic Power Law Singularity Confidence Indicator (MS-LPPLS-CI) approach to identify both positive and negative bubbles in the short-, medium, and long-term. We successfully detect major crashes and rallies during the weekly period from January 1973 to December 2020. Second, we utilize a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach to analyze the predictive impact of our bubble indicators on daily data-based weekly realized volatility (<em>RV</em>). This econometric framework allows us to circumvent potential misspecification due to nonlinearity and instability, rendering the results of weak causal influence derived from a linear framework invalid. The MS-LPPLS-CIs reveal strong evidence of predictability for <em>RV</em> over its entire conditional distribution. We observe relatively stronger impacts for the positive bubbles indicators, with our findings being robust to an alternative metric of volatility, namely squared returns, and weekly realized volatilities derived from 5 (<em>RV5</em>)- and 10 (RV10)-minutes interval intraday data. Furthermore, we detect evidence of predictability for <em>RV5</em> and <em>RV10</em> of nine other developed and emerging stock markets. In addition, we also find strong evidence of causal feedbacks from <em>RV5</em> and <em>RV10</em> on to the MS-LPPLS-CIs of the 10 countries considered. Finally, time-varying connectedness of the <em>RV</em>s of the G7 stock markets is also shown to be strongly (positively) predicted by the connectedness of the six bubbles indicators. Our findings have significant implications for investors and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102300"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824002250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study whether booms and busts in the stock market of the United States (US) drives its volatility. Given this, first, we employ the Multi-Scale Log-Periodic Power Law Singularity Confidence Indicator (MS-LPPLS-CI) approach to identify both positive and negative bubbles in the short-, medium, and long-term. We successfully detect major crashes and rallies during the weekly period from January 1973 to December 2020. Second, we utilize a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles approach to analyze the predictive impact of our bubble indicators on daily data-based weekly realized volatility (RV). This econometric framework allows us to circumvent potential misspecification due to nonlinearity and instability, rendering the results of weak causal influence derived from a linear framework invalid. The MS-LPPLS-CIs reveal strong evidence of predictability for RV over its entire conditional distribution. We observe relatively stronger impacts for the positive bubbles indicators, with our findings being robust to an alternative metric of volatility, namely squared returns, and weekly realized volatilities derived from 5 (RV5)- and 10 (RV10)-minutes interval intraday data. Furthermore, we detect evidence of predictability for RV5 and RV10 of nine other developed and emerging stock markets. In addition, we also find strong evidence of causal feedbacks from RV5 and RV10 on to the MS-LPPLS-CIs of the 10 countries considered. Finally, time-varying connectedness of the RVs of the G7 stock markets is also shown to be strongly (positively) predicted by the connectedness of the six bubbles indicators. Our findings have significant implications for investors and policymakers.
股市波动与多尺度正负泡沫
我们研究了美国股市的繁荣和萧条是否会导致其波动。有鉴于此,我们首先采用多尺度对数周期幂律奇异性置信度指标(MS-LPPLS-CI)方法来识别短期、中期和长期的正负泡沫。我们成功地检测到了 1973 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间每周的重大暴跌和反弹。其次,我们利用非参数因果关系-量化方法来分析我们的泡沫指标对基于每日数据的每周已实现波动率(RV)的预测影响。这种计量经济学框架使我们能够规避非线性和不稳定性导致的潜在规格错误,从而使线性框架得出的微弱因果影响结果失效。MS-LPPLS-CIs 揭示了 RV 在其整个条件分布中的可预测性的有力证据。我们观察到正向气泡指标的影响相对更强,我们的研究结果对另一种波动率指标(即收益平方)以及由 5 分钟(RV5)和 10 分钟(RV10)区间盘中数据得出的每周已实现波动率都是稳健的。此外,我们还发现了其他九个发达和新兴股票市场的 RV5 和 RV10 的可预测性证据。此外,我们还发现了从 RV5 和 RV10 到所考虑的 10 个国家的 MS-LPPLS-CI 的因果反馈的有力证据。最后,七国集团股票市场 RV 的时变关联性也被证明可以通过六个泡沫指标的关联性进行强(正)预测。我们的研究结果对投资者和政策制定者具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信