Stephanie Almeida de Jesus Dias , Renato Máximo Sátiro
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in the judiciary: A critical view","authors":"Stephanie Almeida de Jesus Dias , Renato Máximo Sátiro","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The main objective of this study is to raise questions about using artificial intelligence (AI) in the judiciary based on critical thinking. The essay approach used in this work aims to foster reflection and debate on the subject, presenting a review of theoretical perspectives with particular attention to the critical theory of the first generation of the Frankfurt School and theories that seek to analyze the relationship between humans and society/technology, such as the critical theory of technology, and stays away from the dominant currents of thinking in organizational studies to contribute unexplored perspectives. In this manner, it will go beyond existing benefits and applications, focusing on a critical view that identifies the elements that guide the technological choices that have been made, thus promoting a discussion that aggregates elements for future developments and improvements. Based on this theoretical context, this essay will raise questions and present three propositions summarizing the identified difficulties and directing future studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 103493"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001770","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to raise questions about using artificial intelligence (AI) in the judiciary based on critical thinking. The essay approach used in this work aims to foster reflection and debate on the subject, presenting a review of theoretical perspectives with particular attention to the critical theory of the first generation of the Frankfurt School and theories that seek to analyze the relationship between humans and society/technology, such as the critical theory of technology, and stays away from the dominant currents of thinking in organizational studies to contribute unexplored perspectives. In this manner, it will go beyond existing benefits and applications, focusing on a critical view that identifies the elements that guide the technological choices that have been made, thus promoting a discussion that aggregates elements for future developments and improvements. Based on this theoretical context, this essay will raise questions and present three propositions summarizing the identified difficulties and directing future studies.
期刊介绍:
Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures