Jenna A. Gersib , Megan Rojo , Sarah G. King , Christian T. Doabler
{"title":"Motivational interviewing for students in school settings: A meta-analysis","authors":"Jenna A. Gersib , Megan Rojo , Sarah G. King , Christian T. Doabler","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a brief counseling intervention with demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating unhealthy habits across populations, behaviors, and settings. Although prior research underscores its benefit with adolescents, a comprehensive examination of its application in school settings remains unexplored. Therefore, the primary aim of the present meta-analysis was to calculate the average estimated effect of all studies examining the use of MI with students in school settings. Second, we sought to examine heterogeneity in effects through meta-regression models. Our final model included a meta-analysis of 38 studies with 207 effect sizes evaluating the efficacy of school-based MI. We estimated multivariate models using robust variance estimation with and without outliers. Our results demonstrate a significant estimated effect in favor of using MI to treat an array of behaviors (<em>g</em> = 0.18, 95% Prediction Interval [−0.26, 0.61]). Findings from the meta-regression analyses indicated three significant moderators: (a) the role of the interventionist, (b) target behaviors, and (c) dosage. We offer potential explanations of the findings and discuss current limitations and implications for future work regarding MI in school settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 101386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524001067","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a brief counseling intervention with demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating unhealthy habits across populations, behaviors, and settings. Although prior research underscores its benefit with adolescents, a comprehensive examination of its application in school settings remains unexplored. Therefore, the primary aim of the present meta-analysis was to calculate the average estimated effect of all studies examining the use of MI with students in school settings. Second, we sought to examine heterogeneity in effects through meta-regression models. Our final model included a meta-analysis of 38 studies with 207 effect sizes evaluating the efficacy of school-based MI. We estimated multivariate models using robust variance estimation with and without outliers. Our results demonstrate a significant estimated effect in favor of using MI to treat an array of behaviors (g = 0.18, 95% Prediction Interval [−0.26, 0.61]). Findings from the meta-regression analyses indicated three significant moderators: (a) the role of the interventionist, (b) target behaviors, and (c) dosage. We offer potential explanations of the findings and discuss current limitations and implications for future work regarding MI in school settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.