Should we circumvent knowledge path dependency? The impact of conventional learning and collaboration diversity on knowledge creation

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Le Chang , Huiying Zhang , Chao Zhang
{"title":"Should we circumvent knowledge path dependency? The impact of conventional learning and collaboration diversity on knowledge creation","authors":"Le Chang ,&nbsp;Huiying Zhang ,&nbsp;Chao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.joi.2024.101597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The choice of research strategy is patterned by the essential tension between tradition and innovation. Drawing on the leadership continuum theory, this paper proposes a theoretical framework discussing the continuum of research strategy referred to as conventional learning. We explore how knowledge creation is affected by conventional learning and collaboration diversity. Relevant hypotheses are tested using data from the Web of Science (WoS) database between 1988 and 2018. The results indicate both focused and expansive conventional learning have a positive relationship with knowledge productivity, while they have a U-shaped effect on knowledge creativity. Collaboration diversity positively moderates the relationship between focused and expansive conventional learning and knowledge productivity. Furthermore, although low-level collaboration diversity is optimal for knowledge creativity when the level of conventional learning is low, high-level collaboration diversity is more beneficial for knowledge creativity when the level of conventional learning is high, both for focused and expansive. Our study provides important implications for creative individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157724001093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The choice of research strategy is patterned by the essential tension between tradition and innovation. Drawing on the leadership continuum theory, this paper proposes a theoretical framework discussing the continuum of research strategy referred to as conventional learning. We explore how knowledge creation is affected by conventional learning and collaboration diversity. Relevant hypotheses are tested using data from the Web of Science (WoS) database between 1988 and 2018. The results indicate both focused and expansive conventional learning have a positive relationship with knowledge productivity, while they have a U-shaped effect on knowledge creativity. Collaboration diversity positively moderates the relationship between focused and expansive conventional learning and knowledge productivity. Furthermore, although low-level collaboration diversity is optimal for knowledge creativity when the level of conventional learning is low, high-level collaboration diversity is more beneficial for knowledge creativity when the level of conventional learning is high, both for focused and expansive. Our study provides important implications for creative individuals.
我们应该规避知识路径依赖吗?传统学习和协作多样性对知识创造的影响
传统与创新之间的基本矛盾决定了研究战略的选择。本文借鉴领导力连续体理论,提出了一个讨论研究战略连续体(即传统学习)的理论框架。我们探讨了知识创造如何受到传统学习与合作多样性的影响。我们利用 1988 年至 2018 年期间来自科学网(WoS)数据库的数据对相关假设进行了检验。结果表明,专注型和扩展型常规学习与知识生产率都有正相关关系,而它们对知识创造力的影响呈 U 型。合作多样性正向调节了集中式和扩展式常规学习与知识生产率之间的关系。此外,尽管当常规学习水平较低时,低水平的合作多样性对知识创造力是最佳的,但当常规学习水平较高时,高水平的合作多样性对知识创造力更有利,无论是集中式还是扩展式。我们的研究为具有创造力的个人提供了重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信