Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of essential oils from Madhuca Longifolia flowers and its characterization

Achala Gupta , Mohammed A. Bareen , Priyanka Prasad , Anita Srivastava , Jatindra K. Sahu , Hariprasad P
{"title":"Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of essential oils from Madhuca Longifolia flowers and its characterization","authors":"Achala Gupta ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Bareen ,&nbsp;Priyanka Prasad ,&nbsp;Anita Srivastava ,&nbsp;Jatindra K. Sahu ,&nbsp;Hariprasad P","doi":"10.1016/j.focha.2024.100832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Madhuca longifolia</em> (mahua), a deciduous tree growing throughout the subtropical region of the India is a potential source of differentiated essential oils (EOs) with distinct bioactives. The study aimed to assess the effect of extraction methods on the quantitative and qualitative divergence in the chemical composition of flavor compounds of mahua flower EO. The advanced supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> extraction (SCFE) and ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction (UAE) was compared to the conventional extraction techniques such as hydrodistillation (HD), enzyme-assisted hydrodistillation (HDE) and soxhlet (SOX) for their high-quality essential oil (EO) extraction efficiency. The maximum EO yield of 2.074% was obtained by SCFE followed by HD (1.64%). The presence of significant amount of terpenoids, including 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, γ-terpinene, myrcene, α-terpineol, limonene, and L-linalool in EO was noticed with chemical profiling using GC-MS and E-Nose. SCFE method yielded EOs with best terpenoids as compared to other extraction methods. Furthermore, EO extracted using SCFE had higher total phenol and flavonoid content of 92.56mg GAE/g, 62.18mg QE/g respectively, and DPPH (100.06µg/mL), FRAP (91.52µM Fe(II)/g) antioxidant activity as compared to other extraction methods. A significantly (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05) higher α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition of 37.16% and 43%, respectively, was shown by SCFE EOs. Total carotenoid content of EOs produced using all the extraction techniques ranged from 9.94 (HDE) to 29.673 (SCFE) mg/100g β-carotene. The “van krevelen” plots of CHNS analysis revealed ‘core metabolites’. This study illustrates that SCFE is a more effective method for EO extraction of high quality from low fat plant materials such as mahua flowers as compared to HD, HDE, SOX, and UAE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73040,"journal":{"name":"Food chemistry advances","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100832"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food chemistry advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772753X24002272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Madhuca longifolia (mahua), a deciduous tree growing throughout the subtropical region of the India is a potential source of differentiated essential oils (EOs) with distinct bioactives. The study aimed to assess the effect of extraction methods on the quantitative and qualitative divergence in the chemical composition of flavor compounds of mahua flower EO. The advanced supercritical CO2 extraction (SCFE) and ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction (UAE) was compared to the conventional extraction techniques such as hydrodistillation (HD), enzyme-assisted hydrodistillation (HDE) and soxhlet (SOX) for their high-quality essential oil (EO) extraction efficiency. The maximum EO yield of 2.074% was obtained by SCFE followed by HD (1.64%). The presence of significant amount of terpenoids, including 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, γ-terpinene, myrcene, α-terpineol, limonene, and L-linalool in EO was noticed with chemical profiling using GC-MS and E-Nose. SCFE method yielded EOs with best terpenoids as compared to other extraction methods. Furthermore, EO extracted using SCFE had higher total phenol and flavonoid content of 92.56mg GAE/g, 62.18mg QE/g respectively, and DPPH (100.06µg/mL), FRAP (91.52µM Fe(II)/g) antioxidant activity as compared to other extraction methods. A significantly (p<0.05) higher α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibition of 37.16% and 43%, respectively, was shown by SCFE EOs. Total carotenoid content of EOs produced using all the extraction techniques ranged from 9.94 (HDE) to 29.673 (SCFE) mg/100g β-carotene. The “van krevelen” plots of CHNS analysis revealed ‘core metabolites’. This study illustrates that SCFE is a more effective method for EO extraction of high quality from low fat plant materials such as mahua flowers as compared to HD, HDE, SOX, and UAE.

Abstract Image

超临界二氧化碳萃取马杜鹃花精油及其表征
马杜鹃(Madhuca longifolia)是一种落叶乔木,生长于印度亚热带地区,是具有独特生物活性的不同精油(EO)的潜在来源。这项研究旨在评估萃取方法对麻花香精油风味化合物化学成分的定量和定性差异的影响。研究比较了先进的超临界二氧化碳萃取(SCFE)和超声辅助溶剂萃取(UAE)与水蒸馏(HD)、酶辅助水蒸馏(HDE)和索氏蒸馏(SOX)等传统萃取技术对高品质精油(EO)萃取效率的影响。SCFE 的精油产量最高,为 2.074%,其次是 HD(1.64%)。通过使用 GC-MS 和 E-Nose 进行化学分析,发现萃取物中含有大量萜类化合物,包括 2-乙酰基-1-吡咯啉、γ-松油烯、月桂烯、α-松油醇、柠檬烯和 L-芳樟醇。与其他萃取方法相比,SCFE 法萃取出的环氧乙烷中的萜类化合物含量最高。此外,与其他提取方法相比,使用 SCFE 法提取的环氧乙烷具有更高的总酚和类黄酮含量,分别为 92.56mg GAE/g、62.18mg QE/g,以及 DPPH(100.06µg/mL)和 FRAP(91.52µM Fe(II)/g)抗氧化活性。SCFE 环氧乙烷对α-葡萄糖苷酶和α-淀粉酶的抑制率明显较高(p<0.05),分别为 37.16% 和 43%。采用所有提取技术生产的环氧乙烷的类胡萝卜素总含量从 9.94(HDE)到 29.673(SCFE)毫克/100 克β-胡萝卜素不等。CHNS 分析的 "van krevelen "图显示了 "核心代谢物"。这项研究表明,与 HD、HDE、SOX 和 UAE 相比,SCFE 是一种从麻花等低脂植物材料中提取高质量环氧乙烷的更有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food chemistry advances
Food chemistry advances Analytical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Chemistry (General), Molecular Biology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
99 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信