Faeces as food: a framework for adaptive nutritional coprophagy in vertebrates

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Elaine J. Power , Sally L. Bornbusch , Erin L. Kendrick
{"title":"Faeces as food: a framework for adaptive nutritional coprophagy in vertebrates","authors":"Elaine J. Power ,&nbsp;Sally L. Bornbusch ,&nbsp;Erin L. Kendrick","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nutritional coprophagy has been under-recognized in many vertebrates despite its potential impact on social behaviours, health outcomes and ecological relationships. We reviewed published instances of apparent nutritional coprophagy across all vertebrate taxa, casting a wide net to capture incidental observations as well as focused studies. We found that coprophagy is a recognized, natural behaviour in five of seven vertebrate classes (all except Agnatha and Chondrichthyes), with reports of nutritional coprophagy in over 150 species. Nutritional coprophagy is common among some families and appears to be more common among herbivores and omnivores compared to faunivores. Across all taxa in which they occur, coprophagic behaviours cluster into seven distinct groups, distinguished by source of faeces, life stage, frequency and dietary ecology, as follows. (A) Routine reingestion to fulfil nutrient requirements (20 families of mammals and amphibians); (B) Juvenile nutritional support (11 families of mammals, reptiles and birds); (C) Nutritional supplementation of adults during parental care (18 families of mammals and birds); (D) Adaptation to aphotic, nutrient-poor habitats (2 families of amphibians and bony fish); (E) Frequent supplemental feeding strategy in biodiverse environments (38 families of mammals, reptiles, birds and bony fish); (F) Rare supplemental nutrition (12 families of mammals, reptiles and birds); (G) Targeted ingestion of seeds and fruits found in faeces (7 families of mammals, reptiles and birds). We propose that these groups represent different manifestations of adaptive nutritional coprophagy. Despite the numerous reports of coprophagy that have been documented, the behaviour is still widely considered abnormal or pathological in many animals. Applying this framework may help field researchers, wildlife managers and animal caretakers recognize nutritional coprophagic behaviours and characterize them as part of a dietary strategy. The framework also suggests possible evolutionary pathways for coprophagy as an adaptive behaviour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000334722400263X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nutritional coprophagy has been under-recognized in many vertebrates despite its potential impact on social behaviours, health outcomes and ecological relationships. We reviewed published instances of apparent nutritional coprophagy across all vertebrate taxa, casting a wide net to capture incidental observations as well as focused studies. We found that coprophagy is a recognized, natural behaviour in five of seven vertebrate classes (all except Agnatha and Chondrichthyes), with reports of nutritional coprophagy in over 150 species. Nutritional coprophagy is common among some families and appears to be more common among herbivores and omnivores compared to faunivores. Across all taxa in which they occur, coprophagic behaviours cluster into seven distinct groups, distinguished by source of faeces, life stage, frequency and dietary ecology, as follows. (A) Routine reingestion to fulfil nutrient requirements (20 families of mammals and amphibians); (B) Juvenile nutritional support (11 families of mammals, reptiles and birds); (C) Nutritional supplementation of adults during parental care (18 families of mammals and birds); (D) Adaptation to aphotic, nutrient-poor habitats (2 families of amphibians and bony fish); (E) Frequent supplemental feeding strategy in biodiverse environments (38 families of mammals, reptiles, birds and bony fish); (F) Rare supplemental nutrition (12 families of mammals, reptiles and birds); (G) Targeted ingestion of seeds and fruits found in faeces (7 families of mammals, reptiles and birds). We propose that these groups represent different manifestations of adaptive nutritional coprophagy. Despite the numerous reports of coprophagy that have been documented, the behaviour is still widely considered abnormal or pathological in many animals. Applying this framework may help field researchers, wildlife managers and animal caretakers recognize nutritional coprophagic behaviours and characterize them as part of a dietary strategy. The framework also suggests possible evolutionary pathways for coprophagy as an adaptive behaviour.
粪便作为食物:脊椎动物适应性营养共食的框架
尽管营养共食对社会行为、健康结果和生态关系有潜在影响,但许多脊椎动物的营养共食行为一直未得到充分认识。我们回顾了已发表的所有脊椎动物类群明显的营养共食现象,广泛撒网捕捉偶然观察到的现象以及重点研究。我们发现,在七个脊椎动物类群中,有五个类群(除无脊椎动物和软骨鱼类外)的营养共食是一种公认的自然行为,有超过 150 个物种的营养共食报道。营养共食在一些科中很常见,与动物食肉动物相比,似乎在草食动物和杂食动物中更为常见。根据粪便来源、生活阶段、出现频率和饮食生态学,在所有出现的类群中,共食行为可分为以下七类。(A) 日常再摄食以满足营养需求(哺乳动物和两栖动物的 20 个科);(B) 幼体营养支持(哺乳动物、爬行动物和鸟类的 11 个科);(C) 在亲代照料期间为成体补充营养(哺乳动物和鸟类的 18 个科);(D) 适应嗜磷和营养贫乏的生境(两栖动物和硬骨鱼类的 2 个科);(E) 生物多样性环境中的频繁补充食物策略(哺乳动物、爬行动物、鸟类和硬骨鱼类的 38 个科);(F) 罕见的补充营养(哺乳动物、爬行动物和鸟类的 12 个科);(G) 有针对性地摄取粪便中的种子和果实(哺乳动物、爬行动物和鸟类的 7 个科)。我们认为,这些类别代表了适应性营养共食的不同表现形式。尽管有大量关于共食的报道,但在许多动物中,这种行为仍被普遍认为是不正常或病态的。应用这一框架可以帮助野外研究人员、野生动物管理者和动物看护者识别营养性共食行为,并将其描述为饮食策略的一部分。该框架还提出了共食行为作为一种适应性行为的可能进化途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信