Social information use for spatial decision in the common lizard, Zootoca vivipara

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Mathieu Brevet , Staffan Jacob , Alexis Rutschmann , Murielle Richard , Julien Cote , Jean Clobert
{"title":"Social information use for spatial decision in the common lizard, Zootoca vivipara","authors":"Mathieu Brevet ,&nbsp;Staffan Jacob ,&nbsp;Alexis Rutschmann ,&nbsp;Murielle Richard ,&nbsp;Julien Cote ,&nbsp;Jean Clobert","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Individuals' movements are conditioned by the acquisition of information from personal interactions with the environment or from social sources. Despite the importance of social information in movement decision making, little is known about how individuals proceed when social information comes from multiple sources. Here, we specifically tackled this issue by experimentally testing (1) how social information from multiple sources is used to make relocation decisions and (2) whether a contrast in this information enables individuals to orient themselves in space. Using the common lizard as a model species, we conducted repeated experiments in which a focal neonate received information from two other neonates coming from distinct peripheral environments before being given the opportunity to relocate to either peripheral environment. Specifically, we focused on information on resource availability and intraspecific competition by considering informants' body mass (BM) at birth and their subsequent food intake. Our analyses revealed that the amount of resources in the informants' environments affected relocation decisions, depending on the focal individual's phenotype. We found the probability of relocation increased when both the informants' food intake and the focal individual's BM increased or decreased. We also found the relocation increased when both the informants' and focal individual's BM increased or decreased. Our findings suggest that focal individuals adjust their relocation response to social information according to their needs and/or physical abilities. Conversely, we found no significant effect of differences in BM between informants or spatial variability in resource availability on spatial orientation. This study highlights that multiple sources of social information that reflect the quality of the surrounding environment (competition or resource availability) can be used for movement decision making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347224002768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals' movements are conditioned by the acquisition of information from personal interactions with the environment or from social sources. Despite the importance of social information in movement decision making, little is known about how individuals proceed when social information comes from multiple sources. Here, we specifically tackled this issue by experimentally testing (1) how social information from multiple sources is used to make relocation decisions and (2) whether a contrast in this information enables individuals to orient themselves in space. Using the common lizard as a model species, we conducted repeated experiments in which a focal neonate received information from two other neonates coming from distinct peripheral environments before being given the opportunity to relocate to either peripheral environment. Specifically, we focused on information on resource availability and intraspecific competition by considering informants' body mass (BM) at birth and their subsequent food intake. Our analyses revealed that the amount of resources in the informants' environments affected relocation decisions, depending on the focal individual's phenotype. We found the probability of relocation increased when both the informants' food intake and the focal individual's BM increased or decreased. We also found the relocation increased when both the informants' and focal individual's BM increased or decreased. Our findings suggest that focal individuals adjust their relocation response to social information according to their needs and/or physical abilities. Conversely, we found no significant effect of differences in BM between informants or spatial variability in resource availability on spatial orientation. This study highlights that multiple sources of social information that reflect the quality of the surrounding environment (competition or resource availability) can be used for movement decision making.
普通蜥蜴 Zootoca vivipara 利用社会信息进行空间决策的情况
个体的运动受制于从个人与环境的互动或社会来源中获取的信息。尽管社会信息在迁移决策中非常重要,但人们对个体如何利用来自多个来源的社会信息却知之甚少。在这里,我们通过实验测试了(1)如何利用来自多个来源的社会信息来做出迁移决策,以及(2)这些信息的对比是否能使个体在空间中定位。我们以普通蜥蜴为模型物种,进行了重复实验,在实验中,一个焦点新生个体在有机会搬迁到任何一个外围环境之前,会接收来自其他两个不同外围环境的新生个体的信息。具体来说,我们通过考虑信息提供者出生时的体重(BM)及其随后的食物摄入量,重点研究了有关资源可用性和种内竞争的信息。我们的分析表明,信息提供者所处环境中的资源量会影响迁移决定,这取决于焦点个体的表型。我们发现,当信息提供者的食物摄入量和焦点个体的体重都增加或减少时,迁移的概率就会增加。我们还发现,当信息提供者和病灶个体的生物量都增加或减少时,迁移的概率也会增加。我们的研究结果表明,焦点个体会根据自己的需要和/或体能调整对社会信息的迁移反应。相反,我们发现信息提供者之间的 BM 差异或资源可用性的空间变化对空间定向没有明显影响。这项研究强调,反映周围环境质量(竞争或资源可用性)的多种社会信息来源可用于迁移决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信