A framework for heat energy community planning with a special focus on cost sharing

IF 7.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Bernadette Fina
{"title":"A framework for heat energy community planning with a special focus on cost sharing","authors":"Bernadette Fina","doi":"10.1016/j.esr.2024.101556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While electricity-based energy communities (ECs) have received significant scientific attention, heat-based ECs have not gotten the attention they deserve. This paper builds upon the hypothesis that ECs could be a lever to increase the adoption rates of district heating and thus contribute significantly to decarbonise the heating sector. In order to unleash this presumed potential and close a research gap, a conceptual planning framework is introduced, encompassing EC-tailored heat infrastructure planning and cost sharing mechanisms to distribute the financial burden between individual participants based on transparent criteria. For the efficient and EC-suitable planning of a district heating grid, a shortest path problem is solved using Dijkstra’s algorithm. To address the issue of distributing investment costs among EC participants, eight different cost sharing scenarios are developed. These distinguish between costs for heat generation devices and costs for the heating grid, the latter being further sub-categorised into grid lines on the properties of participating parties and common/third property. The developed framework is then applied to a case study of eight residential buildings and three heat generation sites in a city area. Thereby it is found that the cost variance between different cost sharing scenarios lies between 19.1% and 42.6%. From converting heat infrastructure costs per property to annuities for a time horizon of 30 years, it can be concluded that such investments could remain a significant hurdle for private building owners unless suitable investment incentives are proposed by policy decision makers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11546,"journal":{"name":"Energy Strategy Reviews","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101556"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Strategy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211467X24002657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While electricity-based energy communities (ECs) have received significant scientific attention, heat-based ECs have not gotten the attention they deserve. This paper builds upon the hypothesis that ECs could be a lever to increase the adoption rates of district heating and thus contribute significantly to decarbonise the heating sector. In order to unleash this presumed potential and close a research gap, a conceptual planning framework is introduced, encompassing EC-tailored heat infrastructure planning and cost sharing mechanisms to distribute the financial burden between individual participants based on transparent criteria. For the efficient and EC-suitable planning of a district heating grid, a shortest path problem is solved using Dijkstra’s algorithm. To address the issue of distributing investment costs among EC participants, eight different cost sharing scenarios are developed. These distinguish between costs for heat generation devices and costs for the heating grid, the latter being further sub-categorised into grid lines on the properties of participating parties and common/third property. The developed framework is then applied to a case study of eight residential buildings and three heat generation sites in a city area. Thereby it is found that the cost variance between different cost sharing scenarios lies between 19.1% and 42.6%. From converting heat infrastructure costs per property to annuities for a time horizon of 30 years, it can be concluded that such investments could remain a significant hurdle for private building owners unless suitable investment incentives are proposed by policy decision makers.
热能社区规划框架,特别关注成本分担问题
以电力为基础的能源社区(ECs)受到了科学界的极大关注,但以热能为基础的能源社区却没有得到应有的重视。本文基于这样一种假设,即能源社区可以成为提高区域供热采用率的杠杆,从而为供热行业的去碳化做出重大贡献。为了释放这一假定潜力并填补研究空白,本文引入了一个概念性规划框架,其中包括根据 EC 量身定制的供热基础设施规划和成本分摊机制,以便根据透明标准在各个参与者之间分配财政负担。为高效规划适合欧盟委员会的区域供热网,使用 Dijkstra 算法解决了最短路径问题。为解决在欧共体参与者之间分配投资成本的问题,制定了八种不同的成本分摊方案。这些方案区分了供热设备的成本和供热电网的成本,后者又根据参与方的属性和共同/第三属性进一步细分为电网线路。然后,将所开发的框架应用于一项案例研究,研究对象是城市地区的八栋住宅楼和三个供热场所。结果发现,不同成本分摊方案之间的成本差异在 19.1% 到 42.6% 之间。通过将每栋楼的供热基础设施成本转换为 30 年的年金,可以得出这样的结论:除非政策决策者提出适当的投资激励措施,否则此类投资仍将是私人楼宇业主的一大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Strategy Reviews
Energy Strategy Reviews Energy-Energy (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy Strategy Reviews is a gold open access journal that provides authoritative content on strategic decision-making and vision-sharing related to society''s energy needs. Energy Strategy Reviews publishes: • Analyses • Methodologies • Case Studies • Reviews And by invitation: • Report Reviews • Viewpoints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信