Typhoid conjugate vaccine implementation in India: A review of supportive evidence

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Vijayalaxmi V. Mogasale , Anish Sinha , Jacob John , Habib Hasan Farooqui , Arindam Ray , Tracey Chantler , Vittal Mogasale , Bhim Gopal Dhoubhadel , W John Edmunds , Andrew Clark , Kaja Abbas
{"title":"Typhoid conjugate vaccine implementation in India: A review of supportive evidence","authors":"Vijayalaxmi V. Mogasale ,&nbsp;Anish Sinha ,&nbsp;Jacob John ,&nbsp;Habib Hasan Farooqui ,&nbsp;Arindam Ray ,&nbsp;Tracey Chantler ,&nbsp;Vittal Mogasale ,&nbsp;Bhim Gopal Dhoubhadel ,&nbsp;W John Edmunds ,&nbsp;Andrew Clark ,&nbsp;Kaja Abbas","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Typhoid conjugate vaccines are available in the private market in India and are also recommended by the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (NTAGI) for inclusion in India’s Universal Immunisation Programme in 2022 to control and prevent typhoid fever. Our study aims to synthesise the supportive evidence for typhoid conjugate vaccine implementation in the routine immunisation programme of India.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a literature review to identify supportive evidence for typhoid conjugate vaccine implementation in India based on the key criteria of the World Health Organisation’s Evidence-to-Recommendation framework for National Immunisation Technical Advisory Groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We synthesised evidence on typhoid disease burden, benefits and harms of typhoid conjugate vaccine, cost-effectiveness analysis, and implementation feasibility. However, the in-country evidence on budget impact analysis, vaccine demand and supply forecast, equity analysis, target population values and preferences, immunisation service providers’ acceptability, co-administration safety, and antimicrobial resistance tracking were limited.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on the literature review, we identified evidence gaps. We recommend identifying research priorities for supporting typhoid conjugate vaccine implementation decision-making in India by combining evidence gaps with the perceived importance of the same evidence criteria and factors among immunisation stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136224001414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Typhoid conjugate vaccines are available in the private market in India and are also recommended by the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (NTAGI) for inclusion in India’s Universal Immunisation Programme in 2022 to control and prevent typhoid fever. Our study aims to synthesise the supportive evidence for typhoid conjugate vaccine implementation in the routine immunisation programme of India.

Methods

We conducted a literature review to identify supportive evidence for typhoid conjugate vaccine implementation in India based on the key criteria of the World Health Organisation’s Evidence-to-Recommendation framework for National Immunisation Technical Advisory Groups.

Results

We synthesised evidence on typhoid disease burden, benefits and harms of typhoid conjugate vaccine, cost-effectiveness analysis, and implementation feasibility. However, the in-country evidence on budget impact analysis, vaccine demand and supply forecast, equity analysis, target population values and preferences, immunisation service providers’ acceptability, co-administration safety, and antimicrobial resistance tracking were limited.

Conclusion

Based on the literature review, we identified evidence gaps. We recommend identifying research priorities for supporting typhoid conjugate vaccine implementation decision-making in India by combining evidence gaps with the perceived importance of the same evidence criteria and factors among immunisation stakeholders.
伤寒联合疫苗在印度的实施情况:支持性证据综述
背景伤寒结合疫苗在印度私人市场上有售,国家免疫技术咨询组(NTAGI)也建议将其纳入2022年印度的全民免疫计划,以控制和预防伤寒。我们的研究旨在综合伤寒结合疫苗在印度常规免疫接种计划中实施的支持性证据。方法我们进行了文献综述,根据世界卫生组织国家免疫技术咨询组证据到建议框架的关键标准,确定了伤寒结合疫苗在印度实施的支持性证据。然而,有关预算影响分析、疫苗供需预测、公平性分析、目标人群的价值观和偏好、免疫服务提供者的接受度、联合接种安全性和抗菌药耐药性跟踪的国内证据却很有限。我们建议通过将证据差距与免疫接种利益相关者对相同证据标准和因素的重要性的认识相结合,确定支持印度伤寒联合疫苗实施决策的研究重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信