A moderated mediation model of despotic leadership and knowledge sabotage behavior

IF 9.9 1区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Muhammad Usman , Thomas Garavan , Osman M. Karatepe , Muhammad Waheed Akhtar , Elisa Rescalvo-Martin , Muhammad Kashif Aslam
{"title":"A moderated mediation model of despotic leadership and knowledge sabotage behavior","authors":"Muhammad Usman ,&nbsp;Thomas Garavan ,&nbsp;Osman M. Karatepe ,&nbsp;Muhammad Waheed Akhtar ,&nbsp;Elisa Rescalvo-Martin ,&nbsp;Muhammad Kashif Aslam","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.103966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our paper develops and tests a moderated mediation model of despotic leadership (DL) and knowledge sabotage behavior (KSB). The model assesses: (a) the link between DL and KSB; (b) emotional dissonance as a mediator between DL and KSB; (c) willpower and waypower as the two moderators of the effect of DL on the aforesaid undesirable outcome; and (d) willpower and waypower as the two moderators of the effect of DL on KSB via emotional dissonance. To gauge these relationships, we used time-lagged data obtained from hotel frontline employees. Most of the hypothesized associations are supported, and the model we proposed is viable. Managers’ DL heightens employees’ KSBs, and emotional dissonance mediates this link. FLEs’ waypower reduces the detrimental effect of DL on KSB. Waypower also mitigates the deleterious effect of DL on the said outcome via emotional dissonance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48444,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hospitality Management","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 103966"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hospitality Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278431924002780","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our paper develops and tests a moderated mediation model of despotic leadership (DL) and knowledge sabotage behavior (KSB). The model assesses: (a) the link between DL and KSB; (b) emotional dissonance as a mediator between DL and KSB; (c) willpower and waypower as the two moderators of the effect of DL on the aforesaid undesirable outcome; and (d) willpower and waypower as the two moderators of the effect of DL on KSB via emotional dissonance. To gauge these relationships, we used time-lagged data obtained from hotel frontline employees. Most of the hypothesized associations are supported, and the model we proposed is viable. Managers’ DL heightens employees’ KSBs, and emotional dissonance mediates this link. FLEs’ waypower reduces the detrimental effect of DL on KSB. Waypower also mitigates the deleterious effect of DL on the said outcome via emotional dissonance.
专制领导与知识破坏行为的调节中介模型
本文建立并测试了专制领导(DL)与知识破坏行为(KSB)的调节中介模型。该模型评估了:(a) DL 与知识破坏行为之间的联系;(b) 作为 DL 与知识破坏行为之间中介的情绪失调;(c) 作为 DL 对上述不良结果影响的两个调节因素的意志力和方法力;以及 (d) 作为 DL 通过情绪失调对知识破坏行为影响的两个调节因素的意志力和方法力。为了衡量这些关系,我们使用了从酒店前线员工那里获得的时滞数据。大多数假设的关联都得到了支持,我们提出的模型是可行的。管理者的 DL 会增强员工的 KSB,而情绪失调则是这种联系的中介。FLEs 的 Waypower 降低了 DL 对 KSB 的不利影响。通过情绪失调,领导力也减轻了DL对上述结果的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Hospitality Management
International Journal of Hospitality Management HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
85 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Hospitality Management serves as a platform for discussing significant trends and advancements in various disciplines related to the hospitality industry. The publication covers a wide range of topics, including human resources management, consumer behavior and marketing, business forecasting and applied economics, operational management, strategic management, financial management, planning and design, information technology and e-commerce, training and development, technological developments, and national and international legislation. In addition to covering these topics, the journal features research papers, state-of-the-art reviews, and analyses of business practices within the hospitality industry. It aims to provide readers with valuable insights and knowledge in order to advance research and improve practices in the field. The journal is also indexed and abstracted in various databases, including the Journal of Travel Research, PIRA, Academic Journal Guide, Documentation Touristique, Leisure, Recreation and Tourism Abstracts, Lodging and Restaurant Index, Scopus, CIRET, and the Social Sciences Citation Index. This ensures that the journal's content is widely accessible and discoverable by researchers and practitioners in the hospitality field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信