Equity and accessibility assessment of fixed route transit systems integrated with on-demand feeder services

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Avani Aravind, Suvin P. Venthuruthiyil, Sabyasachee Mishra
{"title":"Equity and accessibility assessment of fixed route transit systems integrated with on-demand feeder services","authors":"Avani Aravind,&nbsp;Suvin P. Venthuruthiyil,&nbsp;Sabyasachee Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In contemporary societies, public transportation holds paramount significance for fostering sustainable and equitable urban development. Concurrently, innovative mobility solutions, such as the integration of on-demand mobility services like Demand Response Transit (DRT) and Transportation Network Companies (TNC) with Fixed Route Transit (FRT) systems, are gaining prominence. On-demand mobility, with its adaptive dynamic routing, can improve public transit access by best utilizing the existing infrastructure. However, to ensure the adequacy of the service of an integrated system, it is essential to evaluate equity and accessibility of the system. While research has explored the adaptability of integrated multi-modal transport systems, a critical gap remains in understanding the impact on transportation accessibility, particularly for transit-reliant communities. This study utilizes spatial indicators to depict accessibility changes at FRT bus stops post-integration with on-demand services. To assess the enhancement in accessibility resulting from integration, the study employed an agent-based model, testing two scenarios: <em>i) Walking with FRT</em> and <em>ii) On-demand Feeder with FRT</em> (DRT and TNC integrated as feeders). The evaluation employs key metrics, including Transit Coverage Gap, the Lorenz curve, and the Gini index, to analyze the accessibility and equity of the integrated services. Additionally, a novel measure, termed the “Accessibility-Radius,” is proposed to quantify spatial accessibility to FRT services. Accessibility-Radius (AR) is defined as the radial service range of a public transit stop, which captures the dependence of the users of the FRT stop to access the public transit facilities. In this study, we quantified the AR as the 90th and 95th percentile distances between various origins and the nearest FRT stops of completed trips. The results of a case study of the city of Morristown, Tennessee, US, indicate that after integration, the Gini index improved from 0.88 to 0.71, and 29.6 % more people had access to public transportation. The study also utilizes the AR performance metric to evaluate a recently developed transit integration project in Memphis, Tennessee, US. The results demonstrate a remarkable 224 % improvement in transit coverage Gap at an FRT stop. Therefore the contribution of this study is a framework to evaluate the accessibility and equity enhancement for a public transit system after integrating with on-demand feeder services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 104028"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324002370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contemporary societies, public transportation holds paramount significance for fostering sustainable and equitable urban development. Concurrently, innovative mobility solutions, such as the integration of on-demand mobility services like Demand Response Transit (DRT) and Transportation Network Companies (TNC) with Fixed Route Transit (FRT) systems, are gaining prominence. On-demand mobility, with its adaptive dynamic routing, can improve public transit access by best utilizing the existing infrastructure. However, to ensure the adequacy of the service of an integrated system, it is essential to evaluate equity and accessibility of the system. While research has explored the adaptability of integrated multi-modal transport systems, a critical gap remains in understanding the impact on transportation accessibility, particularly for transit-reliant communities. This study utilizes spatial indicators to depict accessibility changes at FRT bus stops post-integration with on-demand services. To assess the enhancement in accessibility resulting from integration, the study employed an agent-based model, testing two scenarios: i) Walking with FRT and ii) On-demand Feeder with FRT (DRT and TNC integrated as feeders). The evaluation employs key metrics, including Transit Coverage Gap, the Lorenz curve, and the Gini index, to analyze the accessibility and equity of the integrated services. Additionally, a novel measure, termed the “Accessibility-Radius,” is proposed to quantify spatial accessibility to FRT services. Accessibility-Radius (AR) is defined as the radial service range of a public transit stop, which captures the dependence of the users of the FRT stop to access the public transit facilities. In this study, we quantified the AR as the 90th and 95th percentile distances between various origins and the nearest FRT stops of completed trips. The results of a case study of the city of Morristown, Tennessee, US, indicate that after integration, the Gini index improved from 0.88 to 0.71, and 29.6 % more people had access to public transportation. The study also utilizes the AR performance metric to evaluate a recently developed transit integration project in Memphis, Tennessee, US. The results demonstrate a remarkable 224 % improvement in transit coverage Gap at an FRT stop. Therefore the contribution of this study is a framework to evaluate the accessibility and equity enhancement for a public transit system after integrating with on-demand feeder services.
对与按需接驳服务相结合的固定路线公交系统进行公平性和无障碍评估
在当代社会,公共交通对于促进可持续和公平的城市发展具有至关重要的意义。与此同时,创新的交通解决方案,如按需交通服务(如需求响应公交(DRT)和运输网络公司(TNC))与固定路线公交(FRT)系统的整合,正日益受到重视。按需移动服务具有自适应动态路由选择功能,可充分利用现有基础设施,改善公共交通服务。然而,为了确保综合系统服务的充分性,必须对系统的公平性和可及性进行评估。虽然已有研究探讨了综合多式联运系统的适应性,但在了解其对交通可达性的影响,尤其是对依赖公交的社区的影响方面,仍存在重大差距。本研究利用空间指标来描述与按需服务整合后 FRT 公交站点的可达性变化。为评估整合后交通可达性的提升,研究采用了基于代理的模型,测试了两种情况:i) 与 FRT 一起步行;ii) 与 FRT 一起按需接驳(DRT 和 TNC 整合为接驳)。评估采用了包括公交覆盖率差距、洛伦兹曲线和基尼指数在内的关键指标来分析综合服务的可达性和公平性。此外,还提出了一种名为 "可达性-半径 "的新指标,用于量化快速公交服务的空间可达性。可达性半径(AR)被定义为公共交通站点的径向服务范围,它反映了 FRT 站点用户对公共交通设施的依赖程度。在本研究中,我们将可及半径量化为不同始发站与最近的快速公交站点之间距离的第90和第95百分位数。对美国田纳西州莫里斯镇市的案例研究结果表明,整合后,基尼系数从 0.88 降至 0.71,使用公共交通的人数增加了 29.6%。研究还利用 AR 性能指标对美国田纳西州孟菲斯市最近开发的公交一体化项目进行了评估。结果表明,FRT 站点的公交覆盖率差距显著提高了 224%。因此,本研究的贡献在于提供了一个框架,用于评估公共交通系统与按需接驳服务整合后的可达性和公平性提升情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信