The impact of door to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation time on mortality and neurological outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest acute myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Taro Takeuchi , Yasunori Ueda , Shumpei Kosugi , Kuniyasu Ikeoka , Haruya Yamane , Takuya Ohashi , Takashi Iehara , Kazuho Ukai , Kazuki Oozato , Satoshi Oosaki , Masayuki Nakamura , Tatsuhisa Ozaki , Tsuyoshi Mishima , Haruhiko Abe , Koichi Inoue , Yasushi Matsumura
{"title":"The impact of door to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation time on mortality and neurological outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest acute myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention","authors":"Taro Takeuchi ,&nbsp;Yasunori Ueda ,&nbsp;Shumpei Kosugi ,&nbsp;Kuniyasu Ikeoka ,&nbsp;Haruya Yamane ,&nbsp;Takuya Ohashi ,&nbsp;Takashi Iehara ,&nbsp;Kazuho Ukai ,&nbsp;Kazuki Oozato ,&nbsp;Satoshi Oosaki ,&nbsp;Masayuki Nakamura ,&nbsp;Tatsuhisa Ozaki ,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Mishima ,&nbsp;Haruhiko Abe ,&nbsp;Koichi Inoue ,&nbsp;Yasushi Matsumura","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Few previous studies evaluated the impact of time from the hospital arrival to the implementation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (door to ECPR time) on outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>50 patients with OHCA who received both ECPR and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Cardiovascular Division, NHO Osaka National Hospital were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the median of door to ECPR time. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Survival analyses were conducted to compare all-cause mortality at 90 days between 2 groups. Neurological outcome at 30 days was also compared between 2 groups using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model showed that all-cause mortality at 90 days was significantly higher among patients with door to ECPR time ≥ 25 min compared with those with door to ECPR time &lt; 25 min (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.21–8.18). The proportion of patients with CPC at 30 days ≤ 2 was significantly higher among patients with shorter door to ECPR time (<em>P</em> = 0.048).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Among patients with OHCA due to acute MI who received ECPR and PCI, the shorter door to ECPR time was associated with the lower mortality and favorable neurological outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100473"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602224001162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Few previous studies evaluated the impact of time from the hospital arrival to the implementation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (door to ECPR time) on outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients.

Methods

50 patients with OHCA who received both ECPR and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at Cardiovascular Division, NHO Osaka National Hospital were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the median of door to ECPR time. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Survival analyses were conducted to compare all-cause mortality at 90 days between 2 groups. Neurological outcome at 30 days was also compared between 2 groups using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC).

Results

The multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model showed that all-cause mortality at 90 days was significantly higher among patients with door to ECPR time ≥ 25 min compared with those with door to ECPR time < 25 min (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 3.14; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.21–8.18). The proportion of patients with CPC at 30 days ≤ 2 was significantly higher among patients with shorter door to ECPR time (P = 0.048).

Conclusion

Among patients with OHCA due to acute MI who received ECPR and PCI, the shorter door to ECPR time was associated with the lower mortality and favorable neurological outcomes.
院外心脏骤停急性心肌梗死患者接受初诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,体外心肺复苏门时间对死亡率和神经系统预后的影响
背景以前很少有研究评估从到达医院到实施体外心肺复苏(ECPR)的时间(从入院到实施 ECPR 的时间)对院外心脏骤停(OHCA)急性心肌梗死(MI)患者预后的影响。方法分析了 50 名在 NHO 大阪国立医院心血管科接受 ECPR 和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 OHCA 患者。根据从入院到 ECPR 时间的中位数将患者分为两组。主要结果为全因死亡。对两组患者 90 天的全因死亡率进行了生存分析比较。结果多变量 Cox 比例危险模型显示,与门到 ECPR 时间 < 25 分钟的患者相比,门到 ECPR 时间≥ 25 分钟的患者在 90 天内的全因死亡率明显更高(调整后危险比 [HR]:3.14;95 % 置信区间 [CI]:1.21-8.18)。结论在急性心肌梗死导致的 OHCA 患者中,接受 ECPR 和 PCI 的患者中,门到 ECPR 时间越短,死亡率越低,神经系统预后越好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信