Do affluent neighbourhoods pay more for transit access? Exploring the capitalization of employment accessibility within different housing submarkets in Vancouver

IF 5.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Robert Nutifafa Arku , Christopher D. Higgins , Jaimy Fischer , Steven Farber
{"title":"Do affluent neighbourhoods pay more for transit access? Exploring the capitalization of employment accessibility within different housing submarkets in Vancouver","authors":"Robert Nutifafa Arku ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Higgins ,&nbsp;Jaimy Fischer ,&nbsp;Steven Farber","doi":"10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.104038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Decades of research indicate that accessibility plays a fundamental role in the urban systems of cities by influencing land markets and household location choices. Accessibility is also often positioned as a policy tool in enhancing the well-being of disadvantaged population groups. Considered together, recent research into transportation equity underscores the need to critically investigate the distribution of accessibility with their affordability impacts. To better understand this dynamic, this research assesses variability in the relationship between employment access and house prices within different neighbourhood types in Metro Vancouver. We first calculate network accessibility to employment opportunities. Next, to integrate equity, we use sociodemographic indicators from census data to establish a typology of four neighbourhoods: <em>Affluent, Stable Middle-class, At-Risk Middle-class</em> and <em>Economically-disadvantaged</em>. Finally, using real estate data, we employ spatial econometric models to estimate differences in the capitalization of accessibility in residential property prices across these neighbourhood types. Results suggest that the value of transit access does differ by neighbourhood type in Metro Vancouver. While more affluent neighbourhoods exhibit the highest marginal willingness to pay for accessibility, predicted prices are highest in disadvantaged neighbourhoods due to their higher absolute levels of access. The research offers new insight into how property price effects vary according to different accessibility and sociodemographic contexts, and highlights important implications for both policy and future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48413,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport Geography","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 104038"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport Geography","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692324002473","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decades of research indicate that accessibility plays a fundamental role in the urban systems of cities by influencing land markets and household location choices. Accessibility is also often positioned as a policy tool in enhancing the well-being of disadvantaged population groups. Considered together, recent research into transportation equity underscores the need to critically investigate the distribution of accessibility with their affordability impacts. To better understand this dynamic, this research assesses variability in the relationship between employment access and house prices within different neighbourhood types in Metro Vancouver. We first calculate network accessibility to employment opportunities. Next, to integrate equity, we use sociodemographic indicators from census data to establish a typology of four neighbourhoods: Affluent, Stable Middle-class, At-Risk Middle-class and Economically-disadvantaged. Finally, using real estate data, we employ spatial econometric models to estimate differences in the capitalization of accessibility in residential property prices across these neighbourhood types. Results suggest that the value of transit access does differ by neighbourhood type in Metro Vancouver. While more affluent neighbourhoods exhibit the highest marginal willingness to pay for accessibility, predicted prices are highest in disadvantaged neighbourhoods due to their higher absolute levels of access. The research offers new insight into how property price effects vary according to different accessibility and sociodemographic contexts, and highlights important implications for both policy and future research.
富裕社区是否为交通便利性支付更多费用?探讨温哥华不同住宅子市场内就业便利性的资本化问题
数十年的研究表明,无障碍环境通过影响土地市场和家庭地点选择,在城市系统中发挥着根本性作用。无障碍环境也经常被定位为提高弱势群体福利的政策工具。综合考虑,近期对交通公平性的研究强调,有必要批判性地调查可达性的分布及其对经济承受能力的影响。为了更好地理解这一动态变化,本研究评估了大温哥华地区不同社区类型中就业交通与房价之间关系的变化。我们首先计算就业机会的网络可达性。接下来,为了整合公平性,我们利用人口普查数据中的社会人口指标建立了四种社区类型:富裕社区、稳定中产社区、濒危中产社区和经济弱势社区。最后,我们利用房地产数据,采用空间计量经济学模型来估算这些社区类型的住宅物业价格中交通便利性资本化的差异。结果表明,在大温哥华地区,交通便利性的价值确实因社区类型而异。虽然较为富裕的社区对交通便利性的边际支付意愿最高,但由于交通便利性的绝对水平较高,弱势社区的预测价格也最高。这项研究为我们提供了新的视角,让我们了解不同的交通可达性和社会人口背景对房产价格的影响有何不同,并强调了对政策和未来研究的重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A major resurgence has occurred in transport geography in the wake of political and policy changes, huge transport infrastructure projects and responses to urban traffic congestion. The Journal of Transport Geography provides a central focus for developments in this rapidly expanding sub-discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信