Design and selection of recycling strategy considering consumer preference

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yan-Ting Chen , Ching-Ter Chang
{"title":"Design and selection of recycling strategy considering consumer preference","authors":"Yan-Ting Chen ,&nbsp;Ching-Ter Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the escalating issue of plastic pollution, exploring suitable post-consumer plastic waste (PCPW) recycling holds significant importance for global environmental protection. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel PCPW recycling platform (PRP) that offers two recycling strategies to improve the recycling level of PCPW. Then, we construct a Stackelberg game model to analyze and compare three recycling strategies, <em>i.e.</em>, traditional recycling strategies, only trade-in for cash, and trade-in for cash and for new. Meantime, we consider the impact of consumer preference and government subsidies on recycling strategies. Research finding: (1) The operation of PRP increases the value of PCPW, particularly PRP’s only trade-in for cash has the highest recycling price. (2) PRP’s trade-in for cash and for new can attract more consumers to participate in PCPW recycling under certain conditions. (3) PRP’s only trade-in for cash enables recyclers and remanufacturers to reap greater benefits. To ensure the robustness of our research results, we conduct further analysis to explore the impact of corporate social responsibility (CRS) and the hassle cost. The study also provides management implications for promoting PCPW recycling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 103824"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524004150","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the escalating issue of plastic pollution, exploring suitable post-consumer plastic waste (PCPW) recycling holds significant importance for global environmental protection. To address this issue, this paper proposes a novel PCPW recycling platform (PRP) that offers two recycling strategies to improve the recycling level of PCPW. Then, we construct a Stackelberg game model to analyze and compare three recycling strategies, i.e., traditional recycling strategies, only trade-in for cash, and trade-in for cash and for new. Meantime, we consider the impact of consumer preference and government subsidies on recycling strategies. Research finding: (1) The operation of PRP increases the value of PCPW, particularly PRP’s only trade-in for cash has the highest recycling price. (2) PRP’s trade-in for cash and for new can attract more consumers to participate in PCPW recycling under certain conditions. (3) PRP’s only trade-in for cash enables recyclers and remanufacturers to reap greater benefits. To ensure the robustness of our research results, we conduct further analysis to explore the impact of corporate social responsibility (CRS) and the hassle cost. The study also provides management implications for promoting PCPW recycling.
考虑消费者偏好,设计和选择回收战略
随着塑料污染问题的日益严重,探索合适的消费后塑料废弃物(PCPW)回收利用对全球环境保护具有重要意义。针对这一问题,本文提出了一种新型的消费后塑料废弃物回收平台(PRP),该平台提供两种回收策略,以提高消费后塑料废弃物的回收水平。然后,我们构建了一个 Stackelberg 博弈模型,对三种回收策略(即传统回收策略、以旧换新策略、以旧换新策略)进行了分析和比较。同时,我们还考虑了消费者偏好和政府补贴对回收策略的影响。研究结果:(1)"生产者责任计划 "的运行增加了五氯苯的价值,尤其是 "生产者责任计划 "中的 "以旧换新 "回收价格最高。(2) 在一定条件下,以旧换新可吸引更多消费者参与回收。(3) 「以舊換新」計劃讓回收商和再製造商獲得更大利益。为确保研究结果的稳健性,我们进一步分析探讨了企业社会责任(CRS)和麻烦成本的影响。本研究还为促进五氯苯酚回收提供了管理启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信