Explainable natural language processing for corporate sustainability analysis

IF 14.7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Keane Ong , Rui Mao , Ranjan Satapathy , Ricardo Shirota Filho , Erik Cambria , Johan Sulaeman , Gianmarco Mengaldo
{"title":"Explainable natural language processing for corporate sustainability analysis","authors":"Keane Ong ,&nbsp;Rui Mao ,&nbsp;Ranjan Satapathy ,&nbsp;Ricardo Shirota Filho ,&nbsp;Erik Cambria ,&nbsp;Johan Sulaeman ,&nbsp;Gianmarco Mengaldo","doi":"10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sustainability commonly refers to entities, such as individuals, companies, and institutions, having a non-detrimental (or even positive) impact on the environment, society, and the economy. With sustainability becoming a synonym of acceptable and legitimate behaviour, it is being increasingly demanded and regulated. Several frameworks and standards have been proposed to measure the sustainability impact of corporations, including United Nations’ sustainable development goals and the recently introduced global sustainability reporting framework, amongst others. However, the concept of corporate sustainability is complex due to the diverse and intricate nature of firm operations (<em>i.e.</em> geography, size, business activities, interlinks with other stakeholders). As a result, corporate sustainability assessments are plagued by subjectivity both within data that reflect corporate sustainability efforts (<em>i.e.</em> corporate sustainability disclosures) and the analysts evaluating them. This subjectivity can be distilled into distinct challenges, such as incompleteness, ambiguity, unreliability and sophistication on the data dimension, as well as limited resources and potential bias on the analyst dimension. Put together, subjectivity hinders effective cost attribution to entities non-compliant with prevailing sustainability expectations, potentially rendering sustainability efforts and its associated regulations futile. To this end, we argue that Explainable Natural Language Processing (XNLP) can significantly enhance corporate sustainability analysis. Specifically, linguistic understanding algorithms (lexical, semantic, syntactic), integrated with XAI capabilities (interpretability, explainability, faithfulness), can bridge gaps in analyst resources and mitigate subjectivity problems within data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50367,"journal":{"name":"Information Fusion","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102726"},"PeriodicalIF":14.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253524005049","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainability commonly refers to entities, such as individuals, companies, and institutions, having a non-detrimental (or even positive) impact on the environment, society, and the economy. With sustainability becoming a synonym of acceptable and legitimate behaviour, it is being increasingly demanded and regulated. Several frameworks and standards have been proposed to measure the sustainability impact of corporations, including United Nations’ sustainable development goals and the recently introduced global sustainability reporting framework, amongst others. However, the concept of corporate sustainability is complex due to the diverse and intricate nature of firm operations (i.e. geography, size, business activities, interlinks with other stakeholders). As a result, corporate sustainability assessments are plagued by subjectivity both within data that reflect corporate sustainability efforts (i.e. corporate sustainability disclosures) and the analysts evaluating them. This subjectivity can be distilled into distinct challenges, such as incompleteness, ambiguity, unreliability and sophistication on the data dimension, as well as limited resources and potential bias on the analyst dimension. Put together, subjectivity hinders effective cost attribution to entities non-compliant with prevailing sustainability expectations, potentially rendering sustainability efforts and its associated regulations futile. To this end, we argue that Explainable Natural Language Processing (XNLP) can significantly enhance corporate sustainability analysis. Specifically, linguistic understanding algorithms (lexical, semantic, syntactic), integrated with XAI capabilities (interpretability, explainability, faithfulness), can bridge gaps in analyst resources and mitigate subjectivity problems within data.
用于企业可持续发展分析的可解释自然语言处理技术
可持续发展通常指个人、公司和机构等实体对环境、社会和经济产生无害(甚至积极)的影响。随着可持续发展成为可接受的合法行为的代名词,人们对可持续发展的要求和监管也越来越多。已经提出了一些框架和标准来衡量企业的可持续发展影响,其中包括联合国的可持续发展目标和最近推出的全球可持续发展报告框架等。然而,由于企业运营的多样性和复杂性(即地理位置、规模、业务活动、与其他利益相关者的相互联系),企业可持续发展的概念非常复杂。因此,无论是反映企业可持续发展努力的数据(即企业可持续发展信息披露),还是评估这些数据的分析师,都受到主观性的困扰。这种主观性可以提炼为不同的挑战,如数据方面的不完整性、模糊性、不可靠性和复杂性,以及分析师方面的资源有限和潜在偏见。总之,主观性阻碍了对不符合当前可持续发展预期的实体进行有效的成本归因,可能导致可持续发展工作及其相关法规徒劳无功。为此,我们认为可解释自然语言处理(XNLP)可以显著提高企业可持续发展分析能力。具体来说,语言理解算法(词法、语义、句法)与 XAI 功能(可解释性、可解释性、忠实性)相结合,可以弥补分析师资源的不足,缓解数据中的主观性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Fusion
Information Fusion 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
33.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
161
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Information Fusion serves as a central platform for showcasing advancements in multi-sensor, multi-source, multi-process information fusion, fostering collaboration among diverse disciplines driving its progress. It is the leading outlet for sharing research and development in this field, focusing on architectures, algorithms, and applications. Papers dealing with fundamental theoretical analyses as well as those demonstrating their application to real-world problems will be welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信