Sustainability assessment of additive manufacturing end-of-life material management

John D. Chea , Gerardo J. Ruiz-Mercado , Raymond L. Smith , Michael A. Gonzalez , David E. Meyer
{"title":"Sustainability assessment of additive manufacturing end-of-life material management","authors":"John D. Chea ,&nbsp;Gerardo J. Ruiz-Mercado ,&nbsp;Raymond L. Smith ,&nbsp;Michael A. Gonzalez ,&nbsp;David E. Meyer","doi":"10.1016/j.nxsust.2024.100085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Additive manufacturing (AM) methods enable complex, customized, and on-demand production of many products from different material types across various industries. The growing demand for flexible and more sustainable manufacturing solutions places AM in the mix of processes considered for non-commodities. However, AM processes also present unintentional environmental releases in end-of-life (EoL) material management, compromising overall sustainability. Data availability to assess the sustainability of individual EoL material management from individual AM processes is limited. Even so, EoL materials generated across AM practices frequently overlap, supporting high-level assessment as an alternative approach. Therefore, a holistic AM EoL material management sustainability analysis was completed using a customized list of efficiency, environmental, energy, and economic indicators from the <u>G</u>auging <u>R</u>eaction <u>E</u>ffectiveness for the <u>E</u>nvironmental <u>S</u>ustainability of <u>C</u>hemistries with a multi-<u>O</u>bjective <u>P</u>rocess <u>E</u>valuator (GREENSCOPE) methodology. Subsequently, this assessment identified low material recycling rates and high energy costs in some EoL material management processes, such as incineration and recovery. Subsequently, a trade-off analysis was performed to determine process modification opportunities, including implementing recycling to reduce the amount of hazardous waste at the expense of additional energy and cost investment. The AM EoL-specific sustainability analysis serves as a resource to offer insights and empower policymakers and stakeholders to enhance pollution prevention strategies and optimize the existing EoL material management processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100960,"journal":{"name":"Next Sustainability","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294982362400062X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) methods enable complex, customized, and on-demand production of many products from different material types across various industries. The growing demand for flexible and more sustainable manufacturing solutions places AM in the mix of processes considered for non-commodities. However, AM processes also present unintentional environmental releases in end-of-life (EoL) material management, compromising overall sustainability. Data availability to assess the sustainability of individual EoL material management from individual AM processes is limited. Even so, EoL materials generated across AM practices frequently overlap, supporting high-level assessment as an alternative approach. Therefore, a holistic AM EoL material management sustainability analysis was completed using a customized list of efficiency, environmental, energy, and economic indicators from the Gauging Reaction Effectiveness for the Environmental Sustainability of Chemistries with a multi-Objective Process Evaluator (GREENSCOPE) methodology. Subsequently, this assessment identified low material recycling rates and high energy costs in some EoL material management processes, such as incineration and recovery. Subsequently, a trade-off analysis was performed to determine process modification opportunities, including implementing recycling to reduce the amount of hazardous waste at the expense of additional energy and cost investment. The AM EoL-specific sustainability analysis serves as a resource to offer insights and empower policymakers and stakeholders to enhance pollution prevention strategies and optimize the existing EoL material management processes.
增材制造报废材料管理的可持续性评估
快速成型制造(AM)方法可利用各行各业的不同材料类型,按需生产复杂的定制产品。对灵活且更具可持续性的制造解决方案的需求日益增长,这使得 AM 成为非商品制造工艺中的一种。然而,AM 工艺在报废(EoL)材料管理中也会无意中造成环境排放,影响整体可持续性。用于评估单个 AM 工艺的 EoL 材料管理可持续性的可用数据非常有限。即便如此,AM 工艺中产生的 EoL 材料经常会出现重叠,这支持将高层次评估作为一种替代方法。因此,利用多目标工艺评估器(GREENSCOPE)方法中的 "衡量反应效果以实现化学工艺的环境可持续性 "中的效率、环境、能源和经济指标定制列表,完成了一项整体的 AM EoL 材料管理可持续性分析。随后,该评估确定了一些 EoL 材料管理流程(如焚烧和回收)中的低材料回收率和高能源成本。随后,进行了权衡分析,以确定工艺修改的机会,包括实施回收以减少危险废物的数量,但要以额外的能源和成本投资为代价。针对对环境无害化产品的可持续性分析可作为一种资源,为决策者和利益相关者提供见解并增强其能力,以加强污染预防战略并优化现有的环境无害化产品材料管理流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信