IMPROVING POST-OPERATIVE MEDICATION COMPLIANCE IN A HIGH-TURNOVER CARDIOTHORACIC UNIT

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Nishant Kanitkar , Thomas Springthorpe , Luke Costello , Lauren Tully , Martin Yates
{"title":"IMPROVING POST-OPERATIVE MEDICATION COMPLIANCE IN A HIGH-TURNOVER CARDIOTHORACIC UNIT","authors":"Nishant Kanitkar ,&nbsp;Thomas Springthorpe ,&nbsp;Luke Costello ,&nbsp;Lauren Tully ,&nbsp;Martin Yates","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.09.089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Prevention of common post-operative complications of cardiac surgery necessitates the prescription and early administration of a set ‘bundle’ of medications. Unfortunately, frequent turnover of prescribing staff poses challenges for maintaining consistent practices, leading to delayed administration and an increased risk of complications. Our audit aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of current post-operative prescribing, identify areas for improvement, and implement targeted interventions to enhance compliance with prescribing standards.</div></div><div><h3>Design and method</h3><div>Three successive audits were undertaken, each encompassing one week of typical cardiothoracic cases in December 2022, July 2023, and December 2023 respectively. Each cycle involved classifying prescribed medications into categories of prescribed/not prescribed and administered/not administered, assessed both pre- and post-ward round. The first cycle assessed baseline prescribing practices, the second implemented computerised prescription bundles and educational interventions for training staff, and the third encompassed visual instructions attached to both the admission pro forma and physical workstations. Prescription compliance was measured as the number of prescribed medications administered by the end of day one post-op as a percentage of the total number of indications. Errors were categorised into erroneously not prescribed and erroneously not administered in the second and third cycles only. Medications that were documented as intentionally held were categorised as compliant.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>Results</div><div>There were 60, 25, and 45 patients included within the first, second and third cycles respectively. Mean (SD) prescription compliance was 79.0 (21.5), 89.1 (9.6) and 89.0 (12.4) per cent respectively. Prescription compliance pre-ward round was 51.8 and 44.9 per cent in the second and third cycles respectively. The second cycle contained 312 indicated prescriptions (versus 507 in the third), of which 6.1 (3.5) per cent were erroneously not prescribed and 5.4 (7.1) per cent were prescribed but erroneously not administered. By the third cycle, all medications were above 80% compliance with the exception of clopidogrel and the day-zero stat dose of pantoprazole.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Targeted interventions including prescriber education and computerised bundles can improve prescribing practices in a high-turnover cardiothoracic unit. Poor compliance with clopidogrel prescribing may be related to unclear post-operative instructions, and pantoprazole to an incorrect default prescription in the medication bundle. Ongoing efforts will focus on maintaining overall prescribing standards, encouraging pre-ward round prescription and administration and addressing specific challenges related to certain medications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":"38 12","pages":"Page 54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105307702400716X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Prevention of common post-operative complications of cardiac surgery necessitates the prescription and early administration of a set ‘bundle’ of medications. Unfortunately, frequent turnover of prescribing staff poses challenges for maintaining consistent practices, leading to delayed administration and an increased risk of complications. Our audit aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of current post-operative prescribing, identify areas for improvement, and implement targeted interventions to enhance compliance with prescribing standards.

Design and method

Three successive audits were undertaken, each encompassing one week of typical cardiothoracic cases in December 2022, July 2023, and December 2023 respectively. Each cycle involved classifying prescribed medications into categories of prescribed/not prescribed and administered/not administered, assessed both pre- and post-ward round. The first cycle assessed baseline prescribing practices, the second implemented computerised prescription bundles and educational interventions for training staff, and the third encompassed visual instructions attached to both the admission pro forma and physical workstations. Prescription compliance was measured as the number of prescribed medications administered by the end of day one post-op as a percentage of the total number of indications. Errors were categorised into erroneously not prescribed and erroneously not administered in the second and third cycles only. Medications that were documented as intentionally held were categorised as compliant.

Results and conclusions

Results
There were 60, 25, and 45 patients included within the first, second and third cycles respectively. Mean (SD) prescription compliance was 79.0 (21.5), 89.1 (9.6) and 89.0 (12.4) per cent respectively. Prescription compliance pre-ward round was 51.8 and 44.9 per cent in the second and third cycles respectively. The second cycle contained 312 indicated prescriptions (versus 507 in the third), of which 6.1 (3.5) per cent were erroneously not prescribed and 5.4 (7.1) per cent were prescribed but erroneously not administered. By the third cycle, all medications were above 80% compliance with the exception of clopidogrel and the day-zero stat dose of pantoprazole.

Conclusion

Targeted interventions including prescriber education and computerised bundles can improve prescribing practices in a high-turnover cardiothoracic unit. Poor compliance with clopidogrel prescribing may be related to unclear post-operative instructions, and pantoprazole to an incorrect default prescription in the medication bundle. Ongoing efforts will focus on maintaining overall prescribing standards, encouraging pre-ward round prescription and administration and addressing specific challenges related to certain medications.
提高高周转心胸科病房的术后用药依从性
预防心脏手术术后常见并发症需要开具处方并尽早使用一套 "捆绑 "药物。遗憾的是,处方人员的频繁流动给保持一致的做法带来了挑战,导致用药延迟和并发症风险增加。我们的审核旨在评估当前术后处方的有效性,确定需要改进的地方,并实施有针对性的干预措施,以提高处方标准的合规性。设计与方法我们连续进行了三次审核,每次分别在 2022 年 12 月、2023 年 7 月和 2023 年 12 月对典型的心胸病例进行为期一周的审核。每个周期都将处方药物分为处方/未处方和用药/未用药两类,并在查房前和查房后进行评估。第一个周期评估基线处方实践,第二个周期实施计算机化处方捆绑和对培训人员的教育干预,第三个周期包括附在入院申请表和实体工作站上的可视化说明。处方依从性的衡量标准是术后第一天结束时处方用药的数量占适应症总数的百分比。仅在第二和第三个周期中,错误分为错误未处方和错误未用药。记录为有意保留的药物被归类为合规药物。结果第一、第二和第三周期分别有 60、25 和 45 名患者。处方依从性的平均值(标度)分别为 79.0%(21.5%)、89.1%(9.6%)和 89.0%(12.4%)。第二轮和第三轮发放前的处方依从率分别为 51.8%和 44.9%。第二轮有 312 个注明的处方(第三轮为 507 个),其中 6.1%(3.5%)错误地没有开处方,5.4%(7.1%)开了处方但错误地没有用药。到了第三个周期,除了氯吡格雷和泮托拉唑的零日静点剂量外,所有药物的依从性都超过了 80%。氯吡格雷处方依从性差可能与术后指导不明确有关,泮托拉唑则与药物捆绑中的默认处方不正确有关。目前的工作重点是维持整体处方标准、鼓励病房查房前处方和用药,以及应对与某些药物相关的具体挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信