Formulating efficient P-rich biobased starter fertilizers: Effects of acidification and pelletizing on fertilizer properties

Pietro Sica , Dorette Müller-Stöver , Jakob Magid
{"title":"Formulating efficient P-rich biobased starter fertilizers: Effects of acidification and pelletizing on fertilizer properties","authors":"Pietro Sica ,&nbsp;Dorette Müller-Stöver ,&nbsp;Jakob Magid","doi":"10.1016/j.cec.2024.100111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Animal-derived biowastes can be alternatives to mineral phosphorus fertilizers. However, they typically have lower efficiency and higher transport costs because of their low bulk density. Pelleting can reduce their volume and facilitate their use as placement fertilizers but may also decrease phosphorus availability. This study examined how acidification and pelletizing affect phosphorus availability in biowastes. Digestate solid fraction and meat and bone meal were treated in four ways: (1) untreated (U), (2) acidified (A), (3) untreated pelletized (UP), and (4) acidified pelletized (AP). These treatments were tested in soil incubation and pea growth experiments, with fertilizers placed 5 cm beneath the seeds to evaluate their effectiveness as placement fertilizers. Acidification significantly enhanced the phosphorus solubility of DSF and MBM by approximately 5 and 7 times respectively, while pelletizing acidified materials reduced it. In the incubation experiment, acidified materials in the powdery form showed the highest soil water-extractable phosphorus, with no significant differences among U, UP, and AP ways. In the rhizobox experiment, pelletizing untreated digestate significantly reduced plant dry matter compared to the untreated fibrous form (from 2.0 g to 1.35 g). Acidified and acidified pelletized digestate treatments resulted in the highest shoot dry matter (2.8 g and 2.95 g, respectively), surpassing even triple the amount of superphosphate (2.53 g). For meat and bone meal, the acidified powder led to the highest plant growth (2.0 g), while untreated powder resulted in the lowest amount of plant growth (0.4 g), which was lower than that of the negative control (0.6 g). No significant differences were noted between untreated and acidified pellets. These findings indicate that acidification enhances phosphorus availability in biowastes, while pelletizing reduces it. The acidified pelletized digestate solid fraction has lower volume and higher P use efficiency than its untreated material, showing higher plant growth when compared to mineral P fertilizer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100245,"journal":{"name":"Circular Economy","volume":"3 4","pages":"Article 100111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circular Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773167724000396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal-derived biowastes can be alternatives to mineral phosphorus fertilizers. However, they typically have lower efficiency and higher transport costs because of their low bulk density. Pelleting can reduce their volume and facilitate their use as placement fertilizers but may also decrease phosphorus availability. This study examined how acidification and pelletizing affect phosphorus availability in biowastes. Digestate solid fraction and meat and bone meal were treated in four ways: (1) untreated (U), (2) acidified (A), (3) untreated pelletized (UP), and (4) acidified pelletized (AP). These treatments were tested in soil incubation and pea growth experiments, with fertilizers placed 5 cm beneath the seeds to evaluate their effectiveness as placement fertilizers. Acidification significantly enhanced the phosphorus solubility of DSF and MBM by approximately 5 and 7 times respectively, while pelletizing acidified materials reduced it. In the incubation experiment, acidified materials in the powdery form showed the highest soil water-extractable phosphorus, with no significant differences among U, UP, and AP ways. In the rhizobox experiment, pelletizing untreated digestate significantly reduced plant dry matter compared to the untreated fibrous form (from 2.0 g to 1.35 g). Acidified and acidified pelletized digestate treatments resulted in the highest shoot dry matter (2.8 g and 2.95 g, respectively), surpassing even triple the amount of superphosphate (2.53 g). For meat and bone meal, the acidified powder led to the highest plant growth (2.0 g), while untreated powder resulted in the lowest amount of plant growth (0.4 g), which was lower than that of the negative control (0.6 g). No significant differences were noted between untreated and acidified pellets. These findings indicate that acidification enhances phosphorus availability in biowastes, while pelletizing reduces it. The acidified pelletized digestate solid fraction has lower volume and higher P use efficiency than its untreated material, showing higher plant growth when compared to mineral P fertilizer.
配制高效的富含 P 的生物基起始肥料:酸化和造粒对肥料特性的影响
动物产生的生物废料可以作为矿物磷肥的替代品。不过,由于体积密度较低,它们通常效率较低,运输成本较高。造粒可以减少它们的体积,便于将其用作投放肥料,但也可能降低磷的可用性。本研究探讨了酸化和造粒如何影响生物废料中磷的可用性。沼渣固体部分和肉骨粉有四种处理方法:(1) 未经处理 (U),(2) 酸化 (A),(3) 未经处理造粒 (UP) 和 (4) 酸化造粒 (AP)。这些处理方法在土壤培养和豌豆生长实验中进行了测试,肥料放置在种子下方 5 厘米处,以评估其作为放置肥料的效果。酸化可大大提高 DSF 和 MBM 的磷溶解度,分别提高了约 5 倍和 7 倍,而酸化材料造粒则降低了磷溶解度。在培养实验中,粉状酸化材料显示出最高的土壤水提取磷,而 U、UP 和 AP 三种方式之间没有显著差异。在根瘤菌箱实验中,与未经处理的纤维状沼渣相比,未经处理的沼渣造粒会显著减少植物干物质(从 2.0 克减少到 1.35 克)。酸化和酸化造粒沼渣处理的芽干物质最高(分别为 2.8 克和 2.95 克),甚至超过过磷酸钙(2.53 克)的三倍。就肉骨粉而言,酸化粉末导致的植物生长量最高(2.0 克),而未经处理的粉末导致的植物生长量最低(0.4 克),低于阴性对照(0.6 克)。未经处理的颗粒和酸化颗粒之间没有明显差异。这些研究结果表明,酸化可提高生物废料中磷的可用性,而造粒则会降低磷的可用性。与未经处理的材料相比,酸化造粒后的沼渣固体部分体积更小,磷的利用效率更高,与矿物磷肥相比,植物生长速度更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信