{"title":"Deciphering the cardioprotective effects of statins in anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cancer induced chronic inflammation and cancer drugs effects on the vascular system can lead to rapidly progressing atherosclerotic burden. Statins drugs are known to reduce atherosclerotic plaque burden and inflammation. We studied outcomes of statins for anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction (ARCD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted an online systematic search on PubMed and Embase to identify studies assessing statins' role in alleviating ARCD. We selected 9 studies that had patients with ARCD and use of statins. We primarily focused on outcomes including incidence of heart failure (HF), mean changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random effect model in <em>R-statistics.</em></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 9 studies with a total of 2784 patients we noticed a significant reduction in the incidence of HF among patients administered statins, with an OR of 0.52 (95 % CI 0.37-0.74, p < 0.0003), indicating a substantial protective effect. However, the mean changes in EF, LVEDV, and LVESV from baseline, represented by <em>Hedges's g</em> of 1.09 (95 % CI -0.40 to 2.57, p = 0.15), 0.91 (95 % CI -1.69 to 3.51, p = 0.47), and 1.32 (95 % CI -2.30 to 4.94, p = 0.49) respectively, were not statistically significant. (Figure 1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our meta-analysis confirms statins' effectiveness in reducing risk of ARCD. However, their influence on EF, LVEDV, and LVESV remains uncertain, warranting further study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667724002423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Cancer induced chronic inflammation and cancer drugs effects on the vascular system can lead to rapidly progressing atherosclerotic burden. Statins drugs are known to reduce atherosclerotic plaque burden and inflammation. We studied outcomes of statins for anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction (ARCD).
Methods
We conducted an online systematic search on PubMed and Embase to identify studies assessing statins' role in alleviating ARCD. We selected 9 studies that had patients with ARCD and use of statins. We primarily focused on outcomes including incidence of heart failure (HF), mean changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and end-systolic volume (LVESV) from baseline. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using a random effect model in R-statistics.
Results
Among 9 studies with a total of 2784 patients we noticed a significant reduction in the incidence of HF among patients administered statins, with an OR of 0.52 (95 % CI 0.37-0.74, p < 0.0003), indicating a substantial protective effect. However, the mean changes in EF, LVEDV, and LVESV from baseline, represented by Hedges's g of 1.09 (95 % CI -0.40 to 2.57, p = 0.15), 0.91 (95 % CI -1.69 to 3.51, p = 0.47), and 1.32 (95 % CI -2.30 to 4.94, p = 0.49) respectively, were not statistically significant. (Figure 1).
Conclusion
Our meta-analysis confirms statins' effectiveness in reducing risk of ARCD. However, their influence on EF, LVEDV, and LVESV remains uncertain, warranting further study.