{"title":"Demand for green and fossil fuel automobiles","authors":"Filip Mandys , Shivani Taneja","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Net-zero policy targets will require a transition from conventional vehicles (CVs) to greener alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs). This paper examines what influences the demand for AFVs and CVs in the UK’s large automobile market, looking at vehicle attributes, prices, and other factors, such as brands, country of origin, car segments, and vehicle equipment. Using an extensive, unique dataset covering the period 2008–2019, we compute own-price, cross-price, and demand elasticities for CVs and AFVs. Applying a random-coefficient discrete-choice model of demand, and controlling for consumer heterogeneity, unobserved product characteristics, and price endogeneity, we find that the key drivers of demand are prices, fuel consumption, and vehicle size, with similar demand sensitivity between CVs and AFVs. Demand falls by 3%–5% for a ₤1,000 increase in price for both CVs and AFVs, conditional on the quality and availability of substitutes. This indicates that UK consumers are not willing to pay a price premium for AFVs, suggesting little value placed on the “greenness” of AFVs. We estimate that a ₤1,000 subsidy to AFV purchases would lead to 4% of consumers switching to the greener vehicles. While CVs and AFVs exhibit similar price elasticities, vehicle size affects AFV demand by about 40% more, as their purchasers value smaller sized vehicles. Our results indicate that without financial incentives, the uptake of AFVs may remain low, as the higher cost and lower convenience outweighs the environmental considerations for the majority of consumers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 104284"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096585642400332X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Net-zero policy targets will require a transition from conventional vehicles (CVs) to greener alternative fuel vehicles (AFVs). This paper examines what influences the demand for AFVs and CVs in the UK’s large automobile market, looking at vehicle attributes, prices, and other factors, such as brands, country of origin, car segments, and vehicle equipment. Using an extensive, unique dataset covering the period 2008–2019, we compute own-price, cross-price, and demand elasticities for CVs and AFVs. Applying a random-coefficient discrete-choice model of demand, and controlling for consumer heterogeneity, unobserved product characteristics, and price endogeneity, we find that the key drivers of demand are prices, fuel consumption, and vehicle size, with similar demand sensitivity between CVs and AFVs. Demand falls by 3%–5% for a ₤1,000 increase in price for both CVs and AFVs, conditional on the quality and availability of substitutes. This indicates that UK consumers are not willing to pay a price premium for AFVs, suggesting little value placed on the “greenness” of AFVs. We estimate that a ₤1,000 subsidy to AFV purchases would lead to 4% of consumers switching to the greener vehicles. While CVs and AFVs exhibit similar price elasticities, vehicle size affects AFV demand by about 40% more, as their purchasers value smaller sized vehicles. Our results indicate that without financial incentives, the uptake of AFVs may remain low, as the higher cost and lower convenience outweighs the environmental considerations for the majority of consumers.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.