Validation of clinical tumor depth of invasion measure in patients with oral cavity cancer

Kelsey B. Wood , Lauren S. Buck , Charlotte S. Taylor , Johnny Yang , Edward Florez , Todd A. Nichols , Jeffrey D. Hooker , Candace M. Howard-Claudio , Anne C. Kane , Oishika Paul , Lana L. Jackson , Christopher Spankovich , Gina D. Jefferson
{"title":"Validation of clinical tumor depth of invasion measure in patients with oral cavity cancer","authors":"Kelsey B. Wood ,&nbsp;Lauren S. Buck ,&nbsp;Charlotte S. Taylor ,&nbsp;Johnny Yang ,&nbsp;Edward Florez ,&nbsp;Todd A. Nichols ,&nbsp;Jeffrey D. Hooker ,&nbsp;Candace M. Howard-Claudio ,&nbsp;Anne C. Kane ,&nbsp;Oishika Paul ,&nbsp;Lana L. Jackson ,&nbsp;Christopher Spankovich ,&nbsp;Gina D. Jefferson","doi":"10.1016/j.oor.2024.100667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) for head and neck malignancies incorporated depth of invasion (DOI) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Currently, there is no standardized method to determine clinical DOI (cDOI). We aim to validate radiologic DOI (rDOI) utilizing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Radiographic DOI was defined as the coronal measurement of the deepest margin parallel to the expected normal mucosal plane. To establish a valid, accurate and repeatable rDOI, a retrospective cohort at a single institution tertiary hospital underwent preoperative CECT. Radiographic DOI was independently assessed by 2 neuroradiologists. Correlation was determined between rDOI and pDOI. A prospective pilot study of 49 patients with newly diagnosed OCSCC underwent rDOI assessment compared to final pDOI to assess our rDOI method clinical applicability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Neuroradiologists demonstrated a high degree of predictability between rDOI and pDOI with as great as 90.91 % accuracy for readable CECTs. Inter-observer correlations were strong in the retrospective (Session 1: ICC = 0.956; Session 2: ICC = 0.932) and prospective cohorts (Session 1: ICC = 0.859; Session 2: ICC = 0.913) illustrating reliability. Intraobserver correlations were also strong (Retrospective Reader 1 ICC = 0.968, Reader 2 ICC = 0.941; prospective Reader 1 ICC = 0.965, Reader 2 ICC = 0.800, p &lt; 0.001). T1 lesions were immeasurable 25–62.5 % of the time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using CECT, the coronal measurement of the deepest margin parallel to the expected normal mucosal plane can enhance determination of a reliable cDOI in OCSCC corresponding to pDOI without change in staging for T2 and greater lesions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94378,"journal":{"name":"Oral Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772906024005132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) for head and neck malignancies incorporated depth of invasion (DOI) for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Currently, there is no standardized method to determine clinical DOI (cDOI). We aim to validate radiologic DOI (rDOI) utilizing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) imaging.

Materials and methods

Radiographic DOI was defined as the coronal measurement of the deepest margin parallel to the expected normal mucosal plane. To establish a valid, accurate and repeatable rDOI, a retrospective cohort at a single institution tertiary hospital underwent preoperative CECT. Radiographic DOI was independently assessed by 2 neuroradiologists. Correlation was determined between rDOI and pDOI. A prospective pilot study of 49 patients with newly diagnosed OCSCC underwent rDOI assessment compared to final pDOI to assess our rDOI method clinical applicability.

Results

Neuroradiologists demonstrated a high degree of predictability between rDOI and pDOI with as great as 90.91 % accuracy for readable CECTs. Inter-observer correlations were strong in the retrospective (Session 1: ICC = 0.956; Session 2: ICC = 0.932) and prospective cohorts (Session 1: ICC = 0.859; Session 2: ICC = 0.913) illustrating reliability. Intraobserver correlations were also strong (Retrospective Reader 1 ICC = 0.968, Reader 2 ICC = 0.941; prospective Reader 1 ICC = 0.965, Reader 2 ICC = 0.800, p < 0.001). T1 lesions were immeasurable 25–62.5 % of the time.

Conclusions

Using CECT, the coronal measurement of the deepest margin parallel to the expected normal mucosal plane can enhance determination of a reliable cDOI in OCSCC corresponding to pDOI without change in staging for T2 and greater lesions.
口腔癌患者临床肿瘤侵犯深度测量的验证
目的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第 8 版头颈部恶性肿瘤标准纳入了口腔鳞状细胞癌(OCSCC)的侵袭深度(DOI)。目前,还没有确定临床 DOI(cDOI)的标准化方法。材料与方法放射学 DOI 被定义为平行于预期正常粘膜平面的最深边缘的冠状测量值。为了建立有效、准确和可重复的 rDOI,一家三甲医院的回顾性队列接受了术前 CECT 检查。放射 DOI 由两名神经放射学专家独立评估。确定了 rDOI 和 pDOI 之间的相关性。一项前瞻性试验研究对 49 名新诊断为 OCSCC 的患者进行了 rDOI 评估,并与最终的 pDOI 进行了比较,以评估我们的 rDOI 方法的临床适用性。在回顾性检查(第一场:ICC = 0.956;第二场:ICC = 0.932)和前瞻性检查(第一场:ICC = 0.859;第二场:ICC = 0.913)中,观察者之间的相关性很强,这说明了该方法的可靠性。观察者内部相关性也很强(回顾性阅读者 1 ICC = 0.968,阅读者 2 ICC = 0.941;前瞻性阅读者 1 ICC = 0.965,阅读者 2 ICC = 0.800,p < 0.001)。结论使用 CECT,平行于预期正常粘膜平面的最深边缘的冠状测量可增强 OCSCC 中与 pDOI 相对应的可靠 cDOI 的确定,而不会改变 T2 和更大病灶的分期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信