Comparative thermal model analysis and experimental validation for predicting performance of a pyramidal solar still with integrated pulsating heat pipe

IF 6.3 2区 材料科学 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Nagendra Pandey, Y. Naresh
{"title":"Comparative thermal model analysis and experimental validation for predicting performance of a pyramidal solar still with integrated pulsating heat pipe","authors":"Nagendra Pandey,&nbsp;Y. Naresh","doi":"10.1016/j.solmat.2024.113220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Developing nations face a dire situation as water scarcity and pollution significantly impact various aspects of life. It's crucial to take action now to address these pressing issues and ensure a sustainable future for all. Solar desalination processes emerge as a promising solution to these pressing problems in water purification technologies.</div><div>This paper reports the thermal modeling and experimental results of two solar still designs, namely (i) Pyramidal solar still with pulsating heat pipe (PHP), Modified pyramidal solar still (MPSS), and (ii) conventional pyramidal solar still (CPSS). This study uses energy balance equations to focus on MPSS and CPSS thermal modeling. In the MPSS, a PHP, in conjunction with a solar collector, provides external heat to basin water. Several models, including Dunkel, Kumar and Tiwari, Chen, and Zheng Hongfei, are utilized to estimate the performance of both MPSS and CPSS. Extensive experiments have been conducted for validation purposes. Key parameters considered for prediction and comparison include evaporative heat transfer coefficient, convective heat transfer coefficient, total heat transfer coefficient, and hourly yield. It is noted that the Kumar and Tiwari model demonstrates a superior ability to predict cumulative yield, with a percentage error of 5.81 % and 5.9 % for MPSS and CPSS, respectively, compared to the experimental cumulative yield. The theoretical average basin water temperature observed in MPSS is 64.56 °C, and CPSS is 58.8 °C. The enhancement in temperature is attributed to the supplementary heat provided by the PHP.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":429,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells","volume":"279 ","pages":"Article 113220"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927024824005324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing nations face a dire situation as water scarcity and pollution significantly impact various aspects of life. It's crucial to take action now to address these pressing issues and ensure a sustainable future for all. Solar desalination processes emerge as a promising solution to these pressing problems in water purification technologies.
This paper reports the thermal modeling and experimental results of two solar still designs, namely (i) Pyramidal solar still with pulsating heat pipe (PHP), Modified pyramidal solar still (MPSS), and (ii) conventional pyramidal solar still (CPSS). This study uses energy balance equations to focus on MPSS and CPSS thermal modeling. In the MPSS, a PHP, in conjunction with a solar collector, provides external heat to basin water. Several models, including Dunkel, Kumar and Tiwari, Chen, and Zheng Hongfei, are utilized to estimate the performance of both MPSS and CPSS. Extensive experiments have been conducted for validation purposes. Key parameters considered for prediction and comparison include evaporative heat transfer coefficient, convective heat transfer coefficient, total heat transfer coefficient, and hourly yield. It is noted that the Kumar and Tiwari model demonstrates a superior ability to predict cumulative yield, with a percentage error of 5.81 % and 5.9 % for MPSS and CPSS, respectively, compared to the experimental cumulative yield. The theoretical average basin water temperature observed in MPSS is 64.56 °C, and CPSS is 58.8 °C. The enhancement in temperature is attributed to the supplementary heat provided by the PHP.

Abstract Image

预测集成脉动热管的金字塔形太阳能蒸发器性能的热模型比较分析和实验验证
发展中国家面临着严峻的形势,缺水和污染严重影响着生活的各个方面。现在就采取行动解决这些紧迫问题并确保所有人拥有一个可持续发展的未来至关重要。本文报告了两种太阳能蒸馏器设计的热建模和实验结果,即(i)带脉动热管(PHP)的金字塔形太阳能蒸馏器(MPSS)和(ii)传统金字塔形太阳能蒸馏器(CPSS)。本研究采用能量平衡方程,重点对 MPSS 和 CPSS 进行热建模。在 MPSS 中,PHP 与太阳能集热器一起为池水提供外部热量。包括 Dunkel、Kumar 和 Tiwari、Chen 和 Zheng Hongfei 在内的多个模型被用来估算 MPSS 和 CPSS 的性能。为了验证,还进行了大量实验。用于预测和比较的关键参数包括蒸发传热系数、对流传热系数、总传热系数和每小时产量。结果表明,Kumar 和 Tiwari 模型在预测累积产量方面表现出色,与实验累积产量相比,MPSS 和 CPSS 的百分比误差分别为 5.81 % 和 5.9 %。在 MPSS 中观测到的理论平均流域水温为 64.56 °C,CPSS 为 58.8 °C。温度的提高归因于 PHP 提供的补充热量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
11.60%
发文量
513
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells is intended as a vehicle for the dissemination of research results on materials science and technology related to photovoltaic, photothermal and photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. Materials science is taken in the broadest possible sense and encompasses physics, chemistry, optics, materials fabrication and analysis for all types of materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信