Human factors affecting truck – vulnerable road user safety: a scoping review

IF 9.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Alia Galal , Farah Ghizzawi , Birsen Donmez , Matthew J. Roorda
{"title":"Human factors affecting truck – vulnerable road user safety: a scoping review","authors":"Alia Galal ,&nbsp;Farah Ghizzawi ,&nbsp;Birsen Donmez ,&nbsp;Matthew J. Roorda","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2024.2379905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Truck collisions with vulnerable road users (VRUs) are infrequent, but often severe or fatal. While research has investigated factors contributing to safety and collisions, a synthesis of human-related contributors remains missing. This scoping review follows PRISMA guidelines to synthesise studies on the effects of human factors on truck-VRU safety. With a focus on human factors related to pedestrians, cyclists, and truck drivers, five scientific databases were searched and 3,414 records were screened. Twenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria. Most were published after 2015, indicating a limited but growing focus on human factors affecting truck-VRU safety. Half of the studies analysed police collision reports, while others used qualitative data collection methods, like questionnaires and focus groups, or human subject experiments. Compared to passenger-vehicle literature, notably fewer behavioural studies were identified, highlighting a need for further behavioural human factors studies of truck-VRU interactions. Sociodemographic and vision-related factors were most frequently investigated and found to significantly affect collision occurrence and severity. Driving and cycling experience and training, and road user distractions were examined less, albeit being important. This review bridges a literature gap by focusing on human characteristics, states, decisions, and errors affecting truck-VRU safety, offering insights for road-user-centred mitigation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"44 6","pages":"Pages 1209-1234"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164724000230","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Truck collisions with vulnerable road users (VRUs) are infrequent, but often severe or fatal. While research has investigated factors contributing to safety and collisions, a synthesis of human-related contributors remains missing. This scoping review follows PRISMA guidelines to synthesise studies on the effects of human factors on truck-VRU safety. With a focus on human factors related to pedestrians, cyclists, and truck drivers, five scientific databases were searched and 3,414 records were screened. Twenty-four articles met the inclusion criteria. Most were published after 2015, indicating a limited but growing focus on human factors affecting truck-VRU safety. Half of the studies analysed police collision reports, while others used qualitative data collection methods, like questionnaires and focus groups, or human subject experiments. Compared to passenger-vehicle literature, notably fewer behavioural studies were identified, highlighting a need for further behavioural human factors studies of truck-VRU interactions. Sociodemographic and vision-related factors were most frequently investigated and found to significantly affect collision occurrence and severity. Driving and cycling experience and training, and road user distractions were examined less, albeit being important. This review bridges a literature gap by focusing on human characteristics, states, decisions, and errors affecting truck-VRU safety, offering insights for road-user-centred mitigation strategies.
影响卡车-弱势道路使用者安全的人为因素:范围界定审查
卡车与易受伤害的道路使用者(VRUs)发生碰撞的情况并不常见,但往往会造成严重或致命的后果。虽然已有研究对导致安全和碰撞的因素进行了调查,但与人为因素相关的综述仍然缺失。本范围界定综述遵循 PRISMA 指南,综合了有关人为因素对卡车-VRU 安全影响的研究。重点关注与行人、骑自行车者和卡车司机相关的人为因素,共检索了五个科学数据库,筛选出 3414 条记录。有 24 篇文章符合纳入标准。大部分文章发表于 2015 年之后,这表明影响卡车-VRU 安全的人为因素虽然有限,但越来越受到关注。半数研究分析了警方的碰撞报告,其他研究则使用了定性数据收集方法,如问卷调查、焦点小组或人体实验。与乘用车方面的研究相比,行为方面的研究明显较少,这表明有必要对卡车与 VRU 的相互作用进行进一步的行为人为因素研究。社会人口和视力相关因素是最常被调查的因素,这些因素对碰撞的发生和严重程度有重大影响。对驾驶和骑车经验与培训以及道路使用者分心的研究较少,尽管这些因素非常重要。本综述通过重点研究影响卡车-VRU 安全的人类特征、状态、决策和错误,弥补了文献空白,为以道路使用者为中心的缓解策略提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信