On the axiomatization of an unawareness structure from knowing-whether operators

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Satoshi Fukuda
{"title":"On the axiomatization of an unawareness structure from knowing-whether operators","authors":"Satoshi Fukuda","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.103063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper shows that, on a generalized state space model of unawareness, an agent’s underlying knowledge is axiomatized from her knowing-whether operator if and only if her knowledge satisfies the Truth Axiom: whenever the agent knows an event, the event holds. The agent knows whether an event obtains if she knows it or knows its negation. Different knowledge operators lead to different knowing-whether operators if knowledge is truthful. Conversely, for any knowing-whether operator, there is a unique truthful knowledge operator that induces the given knowing-whether operator: the agent knows an event if and only if she knows whether the event holds and the event indeed holds. Qualitative or probabilistic beliefs may not be recovered from believing-whether. This paper then axiomatizes properties of knowledge and common knowledge, in terms of knowing-whether. The main contributions of the paper are as follows. First, conceptually, this paper provides a generalized-state-space model of knowledge and unawareness in which the only assumption on knowledge is the Truth Axiom. Second, practically, this paper may provide a simple way to construct a generalized-state-space model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50145,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 103063"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030440682400123X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper shows that, on a generalized state space model of unawareness, an agent’s underlying knowledge is axiomatized from her knowing-whether operator if and only if her knowledge satisfies the Truth Axiom: whenever the agent knows an event, the event holds. The agent knows whether an event obtains if she knows it or knows its negation. Different knowledge operators lead to different knowing-whether operators if knowledge is truthful. Conversely, for any knowing-whether operator, there is a unique truthful knowledge operator that induces the given knowing-whether operator: the agent knows an event if and only if she knows whether the event holds and the event indeed holds. Qualitative or probabilistic beliefs may not be recovered from believing-whether. This paper then axiomatizes properties of knowledge and common knowledge, in terms of knowing-whether. The main contributions of the paper are as follows. First, conceptually, this paper provides a generalized-state-space model of knowledge and unawareness in which the only assumption on knowledge is the Truth Axiom. Second, practically, this paper may provide a simple way to construct a generalized-state-space model.
论从 "是否知道 "算子出发的 "不知道 "结构的公理化
本文表明,在一个广义的无意识状态空间模型中,当且仅当代理人的知识满足真理公理(Truth Axiom)时,代理人的基础知识就可以从她的 "是否知道 "算子中公理化出来:只要代理人知道某个事件,该事件就成立。如果代理人知道某个事件或知道其否定,那么她就知道该事件是否成立。如果知识是真实的,那么不同的知识运算符会导致不同的 "是否知道 "运算符。反之,对于任何一个 "是否知道 "算子,都有一个唯一的真知识算子来诱导给定的 "是否知道 "算子:当且仅当代理人知道事件是否成立且事件确实成立时,她才知道该事件。定性或概率信念可能无法从 "是否相信 "中恢复。本文用 "是否知道 "将知识和常识的属性公理化。本文的主要贡献如下。首先,在概念上,本文提供了一个关于知识和不知道的广义状态空间模型,其中关于知识的唯一假设就是真理公理。其次,在实践上,本文提供了一种构建广义状态空间模型的简单方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Economics
Journal of Mathematical Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary objective of the Journal is to provide a forum for work in economic theory which expresses economic ideas using formal mathematical reasoning. For work to add to this primary objective, it is not sufficient that the mathematical reasoning be new and correct. The work must have real economic content. The economic ideas must be interesting and important. These ideas may pertain to any field of economics or any school of economic thought.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信