Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah , Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar , Rosiah Rohani , Muhammad Faiz Fadzizi , Wan Abd Al-Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar , Khalid Sayed , Teh Sabariah Binti Abdul Manan , Antonius Indarto
{"title":"Removal of pharmaceutical compounds from sewage effluent by the nanofiltration membrane","authors":"Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah , Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar , Rosiah Rohani , Muhammad Faiz Fadzizi , Wan Abd Al-Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar , Khalid Sayed , Teh Sabariah Binti Abdul Manan , Antonius Indarto","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Membrane is a promising technology for water treatment, and its commercial production has emerged globally. However, commercial membranes' effectiveness is still uncertain due to the new types of contaminants, such as pharmaceutical compounds (PC). Thus, in the current work, the performance of two commercial membranes (NFX and GC) has been evaluated using feed water from the effluent of sewage treatment plants (STP) and hospital wastewater (HWW). The spiked feed water contains PC classes of analgesics/anti-inflammatory, anti-hypertensives, beta-blockers, and psychiatric/antidepressants. The percentage difference between feed and permeate was measured. While the fouling properties of the membranes are also evaluated using STP and HWW as feed, along with the pure water flux in a variable-pressure setting, the results showed that NFX exhibits excellent, consistent rejection for the targeted PCs (>80 %). GC showed a broader range of rejection (10 % to 90 %) and presented a better flux flow than NFX. The main rejection factor is due to the membrane's pore size variation and the layer construction, which refer to the absorption, size exclusion, and diffusion of the PCs instead of the type of feed water and the flux. Current work provides scientific data on the diverse fabrication and market-available types of membranes, which would pose various efficiencies towards the type of targeted pollution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 106320"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714424015526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Membrane is a promising technology for water treatment, and its commercial production has emerged globally. However, commercial membranes' effectiveness is still uncertain due to the new types of contaminants, such as pharmaceutical compounds (PC). Thus, in the current work, the performance of two commercial membranes (NFX and GC) has been evaluated using feed water from the effluent of sewage treatment plants (STP) and hospital wastewater (HWW). The spiked feed water contains PC classes of analgesics/anti-inflammatory, anti-hypertensives, beta-blockers, and psychiatric/antidepressants. The percentage difference between feed and permeate was measured. While the fouling properties of the membranes are also evaluated using STP and HWW as feed, along with the pure water flux in a variable-pressure setting, the results showed that NFX exhibits excellent, consistent rejection for the targeted PCs (>80 %). GC showed a broader range of rejection (10 % to 90 %) and presented a better flux flow than NFX. The main rejection factor is due to the membrane's pore size variation and the layer construction, which refer to the absorption, size exclusion, and diffusion of the PCs instead of the type of feed water and the flux. Current work provides scientific data on the diverse fabrication and market-available types of membranes, which would pose various efficiencies towards the type of targeted pollution.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies