Experiencia de uso de una herramienta para evaluar el realismo en simulaciones clínicas

Q2 Social Sciences

Educacion Medica Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100981

Judit Sánchez Gómez , Gleyvis Coro-Montanet , Helena Wagner Porto Rocha , Esther García García , Óscar Oliva Fernández

{"title":"Experiencia de uso de una herramienta para evaluar el realismo en simulaciones clínicas","authors":"Judit Sánchez Gómez , Gleyvis Coro-Montanet , Helena Wagner Porto Rocha , Esther García García , Óscar Oliva Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.edumed.2024.100981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Measuring realism in clinical simulation poses a complex challenge due to its subjective and multidimensional nature. ProRealSim, a realism measurement tool developed by researchers from Universidad Europea de Madrid, is based on a theoretical framework that categorizes realism into three dimensions: simulated participant, scenography, and simulator.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The study aimed to comprehend the perception of clinical experts regarding the ProRealSim tool. A focus group, comprising four clinical experts (three nurses and one doctor) with extensive experience in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) simulations, was conducted through a semi-structured interview.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study revealed that the experts held a positive view of the ProRealSim website, emphasizing its user-friendliness and the clarity of the indicators. However, they also identified potential improvements, such as optimizing the version for mobile devices. Regarding the tool's content, experts found the indicators suitable and easily understandable. Nevertheless, they highlighted certain aspects for improvement, including the relevance of certain indicators that may not apply to all simulations and the inherent subjectivity of the evaluation, recommending the involvement of more than one evaluator in the assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, the study results provide valuable insights for conducting assessments with the ProRealSim tool. The inherent complexity in assessing realism in simulations was highlighted, and strategies such as pre-training, identifying relevant variables for each simulation, and objectivity in such assessments were suggested.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35317,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1575181324000962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Measuring realism in clinical simulation poses a complex challenge due to its subjective and multidimensional nature. ProRealSim, a realism measurement tool developed by researchers from Universidad Europea de Madrid, is based on a theoretical framework that categorizes realism into three dimensions: simulated participant, scenography, and simulator.

Materials and methods

The study aimed to comprehend the perception of clinical experts regarding the ProRealSim tool. A focus group, comprising four clinical experts (three nurses and one doctor) with extensive experience in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) simulations, was conducted through a semi-structured interview.

Results

The study revealed that the experts held a positive view of the ProRealSim website, emphasizing its user-friendliness and the clarity of the indicators. However, they also identified potential improvements, such as optimizing the version for mobile devices. Regarding the tool's content, experts found the indicators suitable and easily understandable. Nevertheless, they highlighted certain aspects for improvement, including the relevance of certain indicators that may not apply to all simulations and the inherent subjectivity of the evaluation, recommending the involvement of more than one evaluator in the assessment.

Conclusions

Overall, the study results provide valuable insights for conducting assessments with the ProRealSim tool. The inherent complexity in assessing realism in simulations was highlighted, and strategies such as pre-training, identifying relevant variables for each simulation, and objectivity in such assessments were suggested.

查看原文本刊更多论文

使用工具评估临床模拟逼真度的经验

导言：由于临床模拟的主观性和多维性，测量临床模拟的逼真度是一项复杂的挑战。ProRealSim 是由马德里欧洲大学的研究人员开发的逼真度测量工具，其理论框架将逼真度分为三个维度：模拟参与者、场景设计和模拟器。研究结果表明，专家们对 ProRealSim 网站持肯定态度，强调其用户友好性和指标清晰度。不过，他们也指出了可能的改进之处，如优化移动设备版本。关于工具的内容，专家们认为指标合适且易于理解。不过，他们强调了某些需要改进的方面，包括某些指标的相关性可能并不适用于所有模拟，以及评估固有的主观性，建议让一名以上的评估员参与评估。强调了评估模拟逼真度固有的复杂性，并提出了一些策略，如预先培训、确定每个模拟的相关变量以及此类评估的客观性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Educacion Medica Social Sciences-Education

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

63 days

期刊介绍： Educación Médica, revista trimestral que se viene publicando desde 1998 es editada desde enero de 2003 por la Fundación Educación Médica. Pretende contribuir a la difusión de los estudios y trabajos que en este campo se están llevando a cabo en todo el mundo, pero de una manera especial en nuestro entorno. Los artículos de Educación Médica tratarán tanto sobre aspectos prácticos de la docencia en su día a día como sobre cuestiones más teóricas de la educación médica. Así mismo, la revista intentará proporcionar análisis y opiniones de expertos de reconocido prestigio internacional.