Integration of plant and microbial oil processing at oilcane biorefineries for more sustainable biofuel production

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Yoel R. Cortés-Peña, William Woodruff, Shivali Banerjee, Yalin Li, Vijay Singh, Christopher V. Rao, Jeremy S. Guest
{"title":"Integration of plant and microbial oil processing at oilcane biorefineries for more sustainable biofuel production","authors":"Yoel R. Cortés-Peña,&nbsp;William Woodruff,&nbsp;Shivali Banerjee,&nbsp;Yalin Li,&nbsp;Vijay Singh,&nbsp;Christopher V. Rao,&nbsp;Jeremy S. Guest","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Oilcane—an oil-accumulating crop engineered from sugarcane—and microbial oil have the potential to improve renewable oil production and help meet the expected demand for bioderived oleochemicals and fuels. To assess the potential synergies of processing both plant and microbial oils, the economic and environmental implications of integrating microbial oil production at oilcane and sugarcane biorefineries were characterized. Due to decreased crop yields that lead to higher simulated feedstock prices and lower biorefinery capacities, current oilcane prototypes result in higher costs and carbon intensities than microbial oil from sugarcane. To inform oilcane feedstock development, we calculated the required biomass yields (as a function of oil content) for oilcane to achieve financial parity with sugarcane. At 10 dw% oil, oilcane can sustain up to 30% less yield than sugarcane and still be more profitable in all simulated scenarios. Assuming continued improvements in microbial oil production from cane juice, achieving this target results in a minimum biodiesel selling price of 1.34 [0.90, 1.85] USD∙L<sup>−1</sup> (presented as median [5th, 95th] percentiles), a carbon intensity of 0.51 [0.47, 0.55] kg CO<sub>2</sub>e L<sup>−1</sup>, and a total biodiesel yield of 2140 [1870, 2410] L ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>. Compared to biofuel production from soybean, this outcome is equivalent to 3.0–3.9 as much biofuel per hectare of land and a 57%–63% reduction in carbon intensity. While only 20% of simulated scenarios fell within the market price range of biodiesel (0.45–1.11 USD∙L<sup>−1</sup>), if the oilcane biomass yield would improve to 25.6 DMT∙ha<sup>−1</sup>∙y<sup>−1</sup> (an equivalent yield to sugarcane) 87% of evaluated scenarios would have a minimum biodiesel selling price within or below the market price range.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13183","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13183","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oilcane—an oil-accumulating crop engineered from sugarcane—and microbial oil have the potential to improve renewable oil production and help meet the expected demand for bioderived oleochemicals and fuels. To assess the potential synergies of processing both plant and microbial oils, the economic and environmental implications of integrating microbial oil production at oilcane and sugarcane biorefineries were characterized. Due to decreased crop yields that lead to higher simulated feedstock prices and lower biorefinery capacities, current oilcane prototypes result in higher costs and carbon intensities than microbial oil from sugarcane. To inform oilcane feedstock development, we calculated the required biomass yields (as a function of oil content) for oilcane to achieve financial parity with sugarcane. At 10 dw% oil, oilcane can sustain up to 30% less yield than sugarcane and still be more profitable in all simulated scenarios. Assuming continued improvements in microbial oil production from cane juice, achieving this target results in a minimum biodiesel selling price of 1.34 [0.90, 1.85] USD∙L−1 (presented as median [5th, 95th] percentiles), a carbon intensity of 0.51 [0.47, 0.55] kg CO2e L−1, and a total biodiesel yield of 2140 [1870, 2410] L ha−1 year−1. Compared to biofuel production from soybean, this outcome is equivalent to 3.0–3.9 as much biofuel per hectare of land and a 57%–63% reduction in carbon intensity. While only 20% of simulated scenarios fell within the market price range of biodiesel (0.45–1.11 USD∙L−1), if the oilcane biomass yield would improve to 25.6 DMT∙ha−1∙y−1 (an equivalent yield to sugarcane) 87% of evaluated scenarios would have a minimum biodiesel selling price within or below the market price range.

Abstract Image

在油甘蔗生物炼油厂整合植物油和微生物油加工工艺,实现更可持续的生物燃料生产
油甘蔗是一种从甘蔗中培育出来的油料作物,微生物油具有提高可再生油生产的潜力,有助于满足对生物衍生油化学品和燃料的预期需求。为了评估植物油和微生物油加工的潜在协同效应,我们对油菜和甘蔗生物炼油厂整合微生物油生产的经济和环境影响进行了分析。由于作物产量下降导致模拟原料价格上涨和生物炼油厂产能降低,目前的油甘蔗原型比甘蔗微生物油的成本和碳强度更高。为了给油甘蔗原料开发提供信息,我们计算了油甘蔗实现与甘蔗财务平价所需的生物质产量(作为含油量的函数)。在含油量为 10 dw% 的情况下,油甘蔗的产量最多可比甘蔗低 30%,而且在所有模拟方案中仍然更有利可图。假设甘蔗汁微生物产油量持续提高,实现这一目标的最低生物柴油售价为 1.34 [0.90, 1.85] 美元/升-1(以中位数 [第 5, 95%] 百分位数表示),碳强度为 0.51 [0.47, 0.55] 千克二氧化碳当量/升-1,生物柴油总产量为 2140 [1870, 2410] 升/公顷-年-1。与用大豆生产生物燃料相比,这一结果相当于每公顷土地生产 3.0-3.9 公吨生物燃料,碳强度降低 57%-63%。虽然只有 20% 的模拟方案在生物柴油的市场价格范围内(0.45-1.11 美元/升-1),但如果油甘蔗生物质产量提高到 25.6 DMT∙ha-1∙y-1 (与甘蔗产量相当),87% 的评估方案的生物柴油最低销售价格将在市场价格范围内或低于市场价格范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信