Relationship of Regular Laxative Use, Genetic Susceptibility of Depression, and Risk of Incident Depression in the General Population

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Yuanyuan Zhang, Xiaoqin Gan, Chun Zhou, Ziliang Ye, Panpan He, Mengyi Liu, Yanjun Zhang, Sisi Yang, Xianhui Qin
{"title":"Relationship of Regular Laxative Use, Genetic Susceptibility of Depression, and Risk of Incident Depression in the General Population","authors":"Yuanyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaoqin Gan,&nbsp;Chun Zhou,&nbsp;Ziliang Ye,&nbsp;Panpan He,&nbsp;Mengyi Liu,&nbsp;Yanjun Zhang,&nbsp;Sisi Yang,&nbsp;Xianhui Qin","doi":"10.1155/2024/6863037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> The relationship between laxative use and the risk of depression remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the prospective association of regular laxative use with the risk of incident depression and to examine whether genetic risk of depression modifies this association.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Four hundred fifty thousand forty-five participants without depression at baseline and have complete information on laxative use from the UK Biobank were included. The study outcome was incident depression, derived from linkage to primary care records, hospital inpatient data, death register records, or self-reported medical conditions at follow-up visits.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> During a median follow-up of 12.4 years, 18,651(4.1%) participants have developed depression. Regular laxative use was significantly associated with a higher risk of incident depression (vs. nonregular laxative use; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68–1.89). Genetic risk of depression did not significantly modify this association. The risk of incident depression increased with increasing types of laxatives used, with a HR of 1.89 (95%CI, 1.73–2.08) for use of single laxative type and 2.32 (95%CI, 1.82–2.96) for combined use of two or more laxative types (<i>P</i> for trend &lt;0.001). The positive association between regular laxative use and incident depression was more pronounced in men (adjusted HR = 2.21, 95%CI, 1.96–2.48) versus women (adjusted HR = 1.67, 95%CI, 1.56–1.79; <i>P</i> interaction &lt;0.001). Compared to those who did not use laxatives regularly and did not have constipation, participants who used laxatives regularly and had constipation had the highest risk of incident depression (adjusted HR = 2.33, 95%CI, 1.94–2.80).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Regular laxative use was significantly associated with a higher risk of incident depression, especially in men.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/6863037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6863037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relationship between laxative use and the risk of depression remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the prospective association of regular laxative use with the risk of incident depression and to examine whether genetic risk of depression modifies this association.

Methods: Four hundred fifty thousand forty-five participants without depression at baseline and have complete information on laxative use from the UK Biobank were included. The study outcome was incident depression, derived from linkage to primary care records, hospital inpatient data, death register records, or self-reported medical conditions at follow-up visits.

Results: During a median follow-up of 12.4 years, 18,651(4.1%) participants have developed depression. Regular laxative use was significantly associated with a higher risk of incident depression (vs. nonregular laxative use; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68–1.89). Genetic risk of depression did not significantly modify this association. The risk of incident depression increased with increasing types of laxatives used, with a HR of 1.89 (95%CI, 1.73–2.08) for use of single laxative type and 2.32 (95%CI, 1.82–2.96) for combined use of two or more laxative types (P for trend <0.001). The positive association between regular laxative use and incident depression was more pronounced in men (adjusted HR = 2.21, 95%CI, 1.96–2.48) versus women (adjusted HR = 1.67, 95%CI, 1.56–1.79; P interaction <0.001). Compared to those who did not use laxatives regularly and did not have constipation, participants who used laxatives regularly and had constipation had the highest risk of incident depression (adjusted HR = 2.33, 95%CI, 1.94–2.80).

Conclusions: Regular laxative use was significantly associated with a higher risk of incident depression, especially in men.

Abstract Image

经常使用泻药、抑郁症遗传易感性与普通人群抑郁症发病风险的关系
背景:使用泻药与抑郁症风险之间的关系仍不确定。我们旨在评估定期使用泻药与抑郁症发病风险之间的前瞻性关联,并研究抑郁症遗传风险是否会改变这种关联。 研究方法我们纳入了四十五万四千五百名基线时没有抑郁症且拥有英国生物库中关于使用泻药的完整信息的参与者。研究结果为抑郁症事件,通过与初级保健记录、医院住院病人数据、死亡登记记录或随访时自我报告的医疗状况进行关联得出。 研究结果在中位数为 12.4 年的随访期间,18,651 人(4.1%)患上了抑郁症。经常使用泻药与较高的抑郁症发病风险显著相关(与不经常使用泻药相比;调整后的危险比 [HR] = 1.78,95% 置信区间 [CI],1.68-1.89)。抑郁症的遗传风险并没有明显改变这种关联。随着泻药种类的增加,抑郁症发病风险也随之增加,使用单一泻药种类的HR为1.89(95%CI,1.73-2.08),合并使用两种或两种以上泻药种类的HR为2.32(95%CI,1.82-2.96)(趋势P为0.001)。男性(调整后 HR = 2.21,95%CI,1.96-2.48)与女性(调整后 HR = 1.67,95%CI,1.56-1.79;P 为交互作用 <0.001)相比,定期使用泻药与抑郁事件之间的正相关更为明显。与不经常使用泻药且没有便秘的参与者相比,经常使用泻药且有便秘的参与者发生抑郁症的风险最高(调整后HR = 2.33,95%CI,1.94-2.80)。 结论经常使用泻药与较高的抑郁症发病风险密切相关,尤其是男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信