Fa Li, Qing Zhu, Kunxiaojia Yuan, Fujiang Ji, Arindam Paul, Peng Lee, Volker C. Radeloff, Min Chen
{"title":"Projecting Large Fires in the Western US With an Interpretable and Accurate Hybrid Machine Learning Method","authors":"Fa Li, Qing Zhu, Kunxiaojia Yuan, Fujiang Ji, Arindam Paul, Peng Lee, Volker C. Radeloff, Min Chen","doi":"10.1029/2024EF004588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>More frequent and widespread large fires are occurring in the western United States (US), yet reliable methods for predicting these fires, particularly with extended lead times and a high spatial resolution, remain challenging. In this study, we proposed an interpretable and accurate hybrid machine learning (ML) model, that explicitly represented the controls of fuel flammability, fuel availability, and human suppression effects on fires. The model demonstrated notable accuracy with a <i>F</i><sub>1</sub>-score of 0.846 ± 0.012, surpassing process-driven fire danger indices and four commonly used ML models by up to 40% and 9%, respectively. More importantly, the ML model showed remarkably higher interpretability relative to other ML models. Specifically, by demystifying the “black box” of each ML model using the explainable AI techniques, we identified substantial structural differences across ML fire models, even among those with similar accuracy. The relationships between fires and their drivers, identified by our model, were aligned closer with established fire physical principles. The ML structural discrepancy led to diverse fire predictions and our model predictions exhibited greater consistency with actual fire occurrence. With the highly interpretable and accurate model, we revealed the strong compound effects from multiple climate variables related to evaporative demand, energy release component, temperature, and wind speed, on the dynamics of large fires and megafires in the western US. Our findings highlight the importance of assessing the structural integrity of models in addition to their accuracy. They also underscore the critical need to address the rise in compound climate extremes linked to large wildfires.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024EF004588","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024EF004588","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
More frequent and widespread large fires are occurring in the western United States (US), yet reliable methods for predicting these fires, particularly with extended lead times and a high spatial resolution, remain challenging. In this study, we proposed an interpretable and accurate hybrid machine learning (ML) model, that explicitly represented the controls of fuel flammability, fuel availability, and human suppression effects on fires. The model demonstrated notable accuracy with a F1-score of 0.846 ± 0.012, surpassing process-driven fire danger indices and four commonly used ML models by up to 40% and 9%, respectively. More importantly, the ML model showed remarkably higher interpretability relative to other ML models. Specifically, by demystifying the “black box” of each ML model using the explainable AI techniques, we identified substantial structural differences across ML fire models, even among those with similar accuracy. The relationships between fires and their drivers, identified by our model, were aligned closer with established fire physical principles. The ML structural discrepancy led to diverse fire predictions and our model predictions exhibited greater consistency with actual fire occurrence. With the highly interpretable and accurate model, we revealed the strong compound effects from multiple climate variables related to evaporative demand, energy release component, temperature, and wind speed, on the dynamics of large fires and megafires in the western US. Our findings highlight the importance of assessing the structural integrity of models in addition to their accuracy. They also underscore the critical need to address the rise in compound climate extremes linked to large wildfires.
美国西部发生的大火越来越频繁,范围也越来越广,但预测这些大火的可靠方法,尤其是在较长的准备时间和较高的空间分辨率下预测这些大火的方法,仍然具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种可解释且准确的混合机器学习(ML)模型,该模型明确表示了燃料可燃性、燃料可用性和人类对火灾的抑制作用等控制因素。该模型的准确性显著提高,F1 分数为 0.846 ± 0.012,分别比过程驱动的火灾危险指数和四种常用的 ML 模型高出 40% 和 9%。更重要的是,与其他 ML 模型相比,该 ML 模型显示出更高的可解释性。具体来说,通过使用可解释人工智能技术来揭开每个 ML 模型的 "黑盒子",我们发现了不同 ML 火灾模型之间的实质性结构差异,即使在准确性相似的模型之间也是如此。我们的模型所确定的火灾及其驱动因素之间的关系更符合既定的火灾物理原理。ML 结构上的差异导致了不同的火灾预测结果,而我们的模型预测结果与实际火灾发生情况的一致性更高。通过可解释性高且精确的模型,我们揭示了与蒸发需求、能量释放成分、温度和风速有关的多个气候变量对美国西部大型火灾和特大火灾动态的强烈复合效应。我们的研究结果突出表明,除了评估模型的准确性外,还必须评估模型的结构完整性。这些发现还强调了解决与大型野火有关的复合极端气候上升问题的迫切需要。
期刊介绍:
Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.