Exploring the delivery of adult vaccination outside of primary care settings: A mixed methods scoping review

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Eleftheria Lentakis , Holly Seale , Rajeka Lazarus , Sandra Mounier-Jack
{"title":"Exploring the delivery of adult vaccination outside of primary care settings: A mixed methods scoping review","authors":"Eleftheria Lentakis ,&nbsp;Holly Seale ,&nbsp;Rajeka Lazarus ,&nbsp;Sandra Mounier-Jack","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There are several identified barriers to immunisation delivery and uptake in adults, including governance issues, provider limitations, and patient access. While primary care settings have traditionally been responsible for vaccine delivery, there is a growing need to look to other settings to expand the equitable uptake of vaccinations in adults.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This scoping review aims to identify and explore the role of non-primary care settings in delivering adult vaccinations, operational barriers and facilitators to immunisation delivery in these settings, and interventions delivered to improve uptake.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Peer-reviewed studies published from 01/01/2010 to 31/12/2022 that focused on the delivery of influenza, COVID-19, pneumococcal and herpes zoster vaccines in adult populations outside of primary care settings were included. Studies were also included if they explored barriers and facilitators to delivery, and interventions to improve uptake.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>75 studies were identified for inclusion. Most were quasi-experimental studies, and 58/75 were from the US. Studies were most frequently conducted in in-patient settings, outpatient clinics, nursing homes, and workplaces. Operational planning and logistics, and provider-level issues, such as poor documentation and workflow interruption were commonly identified barriers to delivery. Government funding, continuity of care, and patient convenience were frequently reported facilitators. Interventions shown to improve uptake were operational planning and clinical improvement systems (Plan-Do-Study-Act [PDSA] cycles), provider education and reminders, on-site vaccination, patient education, and financial incentives.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Mapping of the evidence indicates that adult immunisation delivery may be achievable across tertiary and secondary care settings, as well as non-clinical settings, such as workplaces. There are several identified barriers to delivery, predominantly at the provider-level in tertiary-care settings. Intervention such as operational planning, clinical reminders, and on-site vaccination, may facilitate uptake.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2401140X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There are several identified barriers to immunisation delivery and uptake in adults, including governance issues, provider limitations, and patient access. While primary care settings have traditionally been responsible for vaccine delivery, there is a growing need to look to other settings to expand the equitable uptake of vaccinations in adults.

Objectives

This scoping review aims to identify and explore the role of non-primary care settings in delivering adult vaccinations, operational barriers and facilitators to immunisation delivery in these settings, and interventions delivered to improve uptake.

Methods

This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Peer-reviewed studies published from 01/01/2010 to 31/12/2022 that focused on the delivery of influenza, COVID-19, pneumococcal and herpes zoster vaccines in adult populations outside of primary care settings were included. Studies were also included if they explored barriers and facilitators to delivery, and interventions to improve uptake.

Results

75 studies were identified for inclusion. Most were quasi-experimental studies, and 58/75 were from the US. Studies were most frequently conducted in in-patient settings, outpatient clinics, nursing homes, and workplaces. Operational planning and logistics, and provider-level issues, such as poor documentation and workflow interruption were commonly identified barriers to delivery. Government funding, continuity of care, and patient convenience were frequently reported facilitators. Interventions shown to improve uptake were operational planning and clinical improvement systems (Plan-Do-Study-Act [PDSA] cycles), provider education and reminders, on-site vaccination, patient education, and financial incentives.

Conclusions

Mapping of the evidence indicates that adult immunisation delivery may be achievable across tertiary and secondary care settings, as well as non-clinical settings, such as workplaces. There are several identified barriers to delivery, predominantly at the provider-level in tertiary-care settings. Intervention such as operational planning, clinical reminders, and on-site vaccination, may facilitate uptake.
探索在初级医疗机构之外提供成人疫苗接种:混合方法范围综述。
背景:在成人免疫接种和接种率方面存在一些障碍,包括管理问题、提供者的局限性和患者的可及性。虽然传统上由初级保健机构负责疫苗接种,但现在越来越需要从其他机构入手,扩大成人疫苗接种的公平性:本范围界定综述旨在确定和探讨非初级保健机构在提供成人疫苗接种中的作用、在这些机构提供免疫接种的操作障碍和促进因素,以及为提高接种率而采取的干预措施:本范围界定综述是根据乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)范围界定综述指南和范围界定综述扩展的系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行的。纳入的同行评议研究发表于 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日,重点关注在初级医疗机构以外的成年人群中接种流感、COVID-19、肺炎球菌和带状疱疹疫苗的情况。如果研究探讨了接种疫苗的障碍和促进因素,以及提高接种率的干预措施,也将纳入研究:共确定了 75 项研究供纳入。大部分为准实验研究,其中 58/75 来自美国。研究多在住院环境、门诊诊所、疗养院和工作场所进行。运营规划和后勤以及提供者层面的问题,如文件记录不全和工作流程中断,是常见的实施障碍。政府资助、护理的连续性和病人的便利性则是经常报告的促进因素。已证明可提高接种率的干预措施包括运营规划和临床改进系统(计划-实施-研究-行动 [PDSA] 循环)、提供者教育和提醒、现场接种、患者教育和经济激励:证据分析表明,成人免疫接种可在三级和二级医疗机构以及工作场所等非临床环境中进行。目前已发现在实施过程中存在一些障碍,主要是在三级医疗机构的提供者层面。业务规划、临床提醒和现场接种等干预措施可促进疫苗接种率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信