The Effect of Gastric Acid and Material Type on the Surface Roughness of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Resins.

Sultan Aktuğ Karademir, Samet Atasoy, Beyza Yilmaz
{"title":"The Effect of Gastric Acid and Material Type on the Surface Roughness of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Resins.","authors":"Sultan Aktuğ Karademir, Samet Atasoy, Beyza Yilmaz","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to examine the effect of gastric acid on the surface roughness of additive and subtractive manufacturing resin.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, two subtractive manufacturing CAD-CAM resin nanoceramic (CerasmartTM270 (CS), LavaTM Ultimate (LU)) and two additive manufacturing 3D printing permanent resin (VarseoSmile Crownplus (VSP), Crowntec (CT)) was used. CS and LU samples were turned into 10 mm diameter cylinders with a scraper and cut into 2 mm slices on the cutting device. CT and VSP samples were produced on a 3D printer (2mm thickness-10mm diameter) (n:15). All samples were exposed to a cycle of 60 seconds of gastric acid, 5 seconds of distilled water, and 30 minutes of artificial saliva, 6 times a day for 10 days. Surface roughness mean (Ra) and depth (Rz) was measured with a contact profilometer at baseline and after gastric acid cycling. Data were analyzed using SPSS (22.0), One way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey's and Independent-t test (p <.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ra-Rz values of CT and VSP were significantly higher than CS and LU at baseline and after the gastric acid cycle (p <.05). After the gastric acid cycle, the Ra-Rz values of all materials increased significantly compared to the baseline (p <.05) but the Ra values of all materials were at a clinically acceptable level (<0.2µm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although additive manufacturing 3D printing permanent resins offered higher roughness values, they weren't at a clinically unacceptable level. Therefore, they can be an alternative to subtractive manufacturing CAD-CAM resin nanoceramics.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of gastric acid on the surface roughness of additive and subtractive manufacturing resin.

Materials and methods: In this study, two subtractive manufacturing CAD-CAM resin nanoceramic (CerasmartTM270 (CS), LavaTM Ultimate (LU)) and two additive manufacturing 3D printing permanent resin (VarseoSmile Crownplus (VSP), Crowntec (CT)) was used. CS and LU samples were turned into 10 mm diameter cylinders with a scraper and cut into 2 mm slices on the cutting device. CT and VSP samples were produced on a 3D printer (2mm thickness-10mm diameter) (n:15). All samples were exposed to a cycle of 60 seconds of gastric acid, 5 seconds of distilled water, and 30 minutes of artificial saliva, 6 times a day for 10 days. Surface roughness mean (Ra) and depth (Rz) was measured with a contact profilometer at baseline and after gastric acid cycling. Data were analyzed using SPSS (22.0), One way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey's and Independent-t test (p <.05).

Results: Ra-Rz values of CT and VSP were significantly higher than CS and LU at baseline and after the gastric acid cycle (p <.05). After the gastric acid cycle, the Ra-Rz values of all materials increased significantly compared to the baseline (p <.05) but the Ra values of all materials were at a clinically acceptable level (<0.2µm).

Conclusion: Although additive manufacturing 3D printing permanent resins offered higher roughness values, they weren't at a clinically unacceptable level. Therefore, they can be an alternative to subtractive manufacturing CAD-CAM resin nanoceramics.

胃酸和材料类型对添加型和减量型制造树脂表面粗糙度的影响
目的:本研究旨在探讨胃酸对加法和减法制造树脂表面粗糙度的影响:本研究使用了两种减法制造 CAD-CAM 树脂纳米陶瓷(CerasmartTM270 (CS)、LavaTM Ultimate (LU))和两种加法制造 3D 打印永久性树脂(VarseoSmile Crownplus (VSP)、Crowntec (CT))。用刮刀将 CS 和 LU 样品刮成直径为 10 毫米的圆柱体,然后在切割装置上切成 2 毫米的薄片。CT 和 VSP 样品是用 3D 打印机制作的(厚度为 2 毫米,直径为 10 毫米)(n:15)。所有样品均暴露于胃酸 60 秒、蒸馏水 5 秒和人工唾液 30 分钟的循环中,每天 6 次,持续 10 天。用接触式轮廓仪测量基线和胃酸循环后的表面粗糙度平均值(Ra)和深度(Rz)。数据分析采用 SPSS(22.0)、单因素方差分析、Tukey's 后检验和独立 t 检验(p 结果:在基线和胃酸循环后,CT 和 VSP 的 Ra-Rz 值均明显高于 CS 和 LU(p 结论:CT 和 VSP 的 Ra-Rz 值明显高于 CS 和 LU:虽然增材制造三维打印永久性树脂的粗糙度值较高,但并没有达到临床不可接受的水平。因此,它们可以作为减法制造 CAD-CAM 树脂纳米陶瓷的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信