{"title":"A Case-Control Split-Mouth Study of Comparison of Maximum Occlusal Forces in Endodontically Treated Teeth and Vital Counterparts.","authors":"Mohd Khairul Firdaus Mazlan, Melati Mahmud, Rohana Ahmad, Tong Wah LIm","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the maximum occlusal force in endodontically treated teeth and their vital contralateral counterparts and to evaluate the intraoral factors affecting them.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty adult participants presented with an endodontically treated tooth and its vital contralateral counterpart were recruited, with 15 males and females in each group. Maximum occlusal forces were measured using a wireless sensor network occlusal force recorder, and the mean maximum occlusal force of endodontically treated teeth was compared with that of their vital contralateral counterparts. Multiple-factor ANOVA was used to examine the association between various clinical factors and maximum occlusal force.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean maximum occlusal force for endodontically treated teeth was significantly higher than their vital counterparts (215.44 ± 74.11N and 202.40 ± 70.67N, respectively) (P < 0.001). Among the clinical factors, the maximum occlusal forces were significantly influenced by the location of teeth (P < 0.01) and the crown root ratio (P = 0.01). Upon further analysis of endodontically treated teeth and control groups, the location of teeth was identified as a sole factor associated with maximum occlusal force, with P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The maximum occlusal forces for endodontically treated teeth were statistically significantly higher than those of their corresponding vital contralateral teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the maximum occlusal force in endodontically treated teeth and their vital contralateral counterparts and to evaluate the intraoral factors affecting them.
Materials and methods: Thirty adult participants presented with an endodontically treated tooth and its vital contralateral counterpart were recruited, with 15 males and females in each group. Maximum occlusal forces were measured using a wireless sensor network occlusal force recorder, and the mean maximum occlusal force of endodontically treated teeth was compared with that of their vital contralateral counterparts. Multiple-factor ANOVA was used to examine the association between various clinical factors and maximum occlusal force.
Results: The mean maximum occlusal force for endodontically treated teeth was significantly higher than their vital counterparts (215.44 ± 74.11N and 202.40 ± 70.67N, respectively) (P < 0.001). Among the clinical factors, the maximum occlusal forces were significantly influenced by the location of teeth (P < 0.01) and the crown root ratio (P = 0.01). Upon further analysis of endodontically treated teeth and control groups, the location of teeth was identified as a sole factor associated with maximum occlusal force, with P < 0.05.
Conclusion: The maximum occlusal forces for endodontically treated teeth were statistically significantly higher than those of their corresponding vital contralateral teeth.