Time synchronisation for millisecond-precision on bio-loggers.

IF 3.4 1区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Timm A Wild, Georg Wilbs, Dina K N Dechmann, Jenna E Kohles, Nils Linek, Sierra Mattingly, Nina Richter, Spyros Sfenthourakis, Haris Nicolaou, Elena Erotokritou, Martin Wikelski
{"title":"Time synchronisation for millisecond-precision on bio-loggers.","authors":"Timm A Wild, Georg Wilbs, Dina K N Dechmann, Jenna E Kohles, Nils Linek, Sierra Mattingly, Nina Richter, Spyros Sfenthourakis, Haris Nicolaou, Elena Erotokritou, Martin Wikelski","doi":"10.1186/s40462-024-00512-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Time-synchronised data streams from bio-loggers are becoming increasingly important for analysing and interpreting intricate animal behaviour including split-second decision making, group dynamics, and collective responses to environmental conditions. With the increased use of AI-based approaches for behaviour classification, time synchronisation between recording systems is becoming an essential challenge. Current solutions in bio-logging rely on manually removing time errors during post processing, which is complex and typically does not achieve sub-second timing accuracies.We first introduce an error model to quantify time errors, then optimise three wireless methods for automated onboard time (re)synchronisation on bio-loggers (GPS, WiFi, proximity messages). The methods can be combined as required and, when coupled with a state-of-the-art real time clock, facilitate accurate time annotations for all types of bio-logging data without need for post processing. We analyse time accuracy of our optimised methods in stationary tests and in a case study on 99 Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus). Based on the results, we offer recommendations for projects that require high time synchrony.During stationary tests, our low power synchronisation methods achieved median time accuracies of 2.72 / 0.43 ms (GPS / WiFi), compared to UTC time, and relative median time accuracies of 5 ms between tags (wireless proximity messages). In our case study with bats, we achieved a median relative time accuracy of 40 ms between tags throughout the entire 10-day duration of tag deployment. Using only one automated resynchronisation per day, permanent UTC time accuracies of ≤ 185 ms can be guaranteed in 95% of cases over a wide temperature range between 0 and 50 °C. Accurate timekeeping required a minimal battery capacity, operating in the nano- to microwatt range.Time measurements on bio-loggers, similar to other forms of sensor-derived data, are prone to errors and so far received little scientific attention. Our combinable methods offer a means to quantify time errors and autonomously correct them at the source (i.e., on bio-loggers). This approach facilitates sub-second comparisons of simultaneously recorded time series data across multiple individuals and off-animal devices such as cameras or weather stations. Through automated resynchronisations on bio-loggers, long-term sub-second accurate timestamps become feasible, even for life-time studies on animals. We contend that our methods have potential to greatly enhance the quality of ecological data, thereby improving scientific conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54288,"journal":{"name":"Movement Ecology","volume":"12 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-024-00512-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Time-synchronised data streams from bio-loggers are becoming increasingly important for analysing and interpreting intricate animal behaviour including split-second decision making, group dynamics, and collective responses to environmental conditions. With the increased use of AI-based approaches for behaviour classification, time synchronisation between recording systems is becoming an essential challenge. Current solutions in bio-logging rely on manually removing time errors during post processing, which is complex and typically does not achieve sub-second timing accuracies.We first introduce an error model to quantify time errors, then optimise three wireless methods for automated onboard time (re)synchronisation on bio-loggers (GPS, WiFi, proximity messages). The methods can be combined as required and, when coupled with a state-of-the-art real time clock, facilitate accurate time annotations for all types of bio-logging data without need for post processing. We analyse time accuracy of our optimised methods in stationary tests and in a case study on 99 Egyptian fruit bats (Rousettus aegyptiacus). Based on the results, we offer recommendations for projects that require high time synchrony.During stationary tests, our low power synchronisation methods achieved median time accuracies of 2.72 / 0.43 ms (GPS / WiFi), compared to UTC time, and relative median time accuracies of 5 ms between tags (wireless proximity messages). In our case study with bats, we achieved a median relative time accuracy of 40 ms between tags throughout the entire 10-day duration of tag deployment. Using only one automated resynchronisation per day, permanent UTC time accuracies of ≤ 185 ms can be guaranteed in 95% of cases over a wide temperature range between 0 and 50 °C. Accurate timekeeping required a minimal battery capacity, operating in the nano- to microwatt range.Time measurements on bio-loggers, similar to other forms of sensor-derived data, are prone to errors and so far received little scientific attention. Our combinable methods offer a means to quantify time errors and autonomously correct them at the source (i.e., on bio-loggers). This approach facilitates sub-second comparisons of simultaneously recorded time series data across multiple individuals and off-animal devices such as cameras or weather stations. Through automated resynchronisations on bio-loggers, long-term sub-second accurate timestamps become feasible, even for life-time studies on animals. We contend that our methods have potential to greatly enhance the quality of ecological data, thereby improving scientific conclusions.

在生物记录仪上实现毫秒级精度的时间同步。
来自生物记录仪的时间同步数据流对于分析和解释复杂的动物行为(包括瞬间决策、群体动态和对环境条件的集体反应)越来越重要。随着越来越多地使用基于人工智能的方法进行行为分类,记录系统之间的时间同步正成为一项重要挑战。目前的生物记录解决方案依赖于在后期处理过程中手动消除时间误差,这种方法非常复杂,而且通常无法达到亚秒级的计时精度。我们首先介绍了一种量化时间误差的误差模型,然后优化了三种无线方法,用于自动实现生物记录仪的机载时间(再)同步(GPS、WiFi、近距离信息)。这些方法可根据需要进行组合,与最先进的实时时钟配合使用时,可为所有类型的生物记录数据提供精确的时间注释,而无需进行后期处理。我们在静态测试和对 99 只埃及果蝠(Rousettus aegyptiacus)的案例研究中分析了优化方法的时间准确性。在静态测试中,我们的低功耗同步方法与 UTC 时间相比,实现了 2.72 / 0.43 毫秒(GPS / WiFi)的中位数时间精确度,标签(无线近距离信息)之间的相对中位数时间精确度为 5 毫秒。在对蝙蝠的案例研究中,我们在整个为期 10 天的标签部署过程中,标签之间的相对时间精确度中位数达到了 40 毫秒。在 0 至 50 °C 的宽温度范围内,每天只需进行一次自动重新同步,就能保证 95% 的情况下UTC 时间精确度不超过 185 毫秒。生物记录仪的时间测量与其他形式的传感器数据类似,容易出现误差,迄今为止很少受到科学界的关注。我们的组合方法提供了一种量化时间误差并在源头(即生物记录仪)自动纠正误差的方法。这种方法有助于对多个个体和非动物设备(如相机或气象站)同时记录的时间序列数据进行亚秒级比较。通过在生物记录仪上自动重新同步,即使是对动物进行终生研究,也能获得亚秒级的长期精确时间戳。我们认为,我们的方法有可能大大提高生态数据的质量,从而改进科学结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Movement Ecology
Movement Ecology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
47
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Movement Ecology is an open-access interdisciplinary journal publishing novel insights from empirical and theoretical approaches into the ecology of movement of the whole organism - either animals, plants or microorganisms - as the central theme. We welcome manuscripts on any taxa and any movement phenomena (e.g. foraging, dispersal and seasonal migration) addressing important research questions on the patterns, mechanisms, causes and consequences of organismal movement. Manuscripts will be rigorously peer-reviewed to ensure novelty and high quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信