Comparative study of the outcomes of one-stage versus two-stage reconstruction of chronic multiligament knee injury.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
S A Arojuraye, Ibrahim Abolaji Alabi, Ndubuisi Okoh, Folajuwon Bayode Ayeni, Musliu Kolawole Odunola, M N Salihu
{"title":"Comparative study of the outcomes of one-stage versus two-stage reconstruction of chronic multiligament knee injury.","authors":"S A Arojuraye, Ibrahim Abolaji Alabi, Ndubuisi Okoh, Folajuwon Bayode Ayeni, Musliu Kolawole Odunola, M N Salihu","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) is a complex orthopaedic knee problem, usually following traumatic knee dislocation. Surgical management is preferred and has resulted in better clinical outcomes. However, the optimal surgical treatment protocol is continuously evolving. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of one-stage versus two-stage reconstruction of MLKI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective comparative study was conducted between July 2020 and December 2023 at a government orthopaedic hospital in Nigeria. The inclusion criteria include males and females between 18 and 45 years of age who had one- or two staged knee reconstructions for MLKI and were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. The exclusion criteria were patients below 18 and above 45 years of age, those with previous knee surgery, those associated with femoral or tibia fractures, those with radiological evidence of osteoarthritis, and those with follow-ups less than 12 months. Clinical outcomes using the Lysholm scoring system and complication rate were recorded. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients (26 in the OS group and 25 in the TS group) were studied. There was a significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative Lysholm scores in the two groups (p = 0.86 and 0.57 for OS and TS, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between the postoperative Lysholm scores in the two groups (p = 0.918).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-stage and two-stage reconstruction of chronic MLKI give similar excellent clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2024.10.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI) is a complex orthopaedic knee problem, usually following traumatic knee dislocation. Surgical management is preferred and has resulted in better clinical outcomes. However, the optimal surgical treatment protocol is continuously evolving. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of one-stage versus two-stage reconstruction of MLKI.

Materials and methods: This retrospective comparative study was conducted between July 2020 and December 2023 at a government orthopaedic hospital in Nigeria. The inclusion criteria include males and females between 18 and 45 years of age who had one- or two staged knee reconstructions for MLKI and were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. The exclusion criteria were patients below 18 and above 45 years of age, those with previous knee surgery, those associated with femoral or tibia fractures, those with radiological evidence of osteoarthritis, and those with follow-ups less than 12 months. Clinical outcomes using the Lysholm scoring system and complication rate were recorded. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.

Results: Fifty-one patients (26 in the OS group and 25 in the TS group) were studied. There was a significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative Lysholm scores in the two groups (p = 0.86 and 0.57 for OS and TS, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between the postoperative Lysholm scores in the two groups (p = 0.918).

Conclusion: One-stage and two-stage reconstruction of chronic MLKI give similar excellent clinical outcomes.

慢性膝关节多韧带损伤一期重建与二期重建疗效比较研究。
背景:多韧带膝关节损伤(MLKI)是一种复杂的膝关节矫形问题,通常发生在外伤性膝关节脱位之后。手术治疗是首选,并能带来更好的临床疗效。然而,最佳手术治疗方案仍在不断演变。本研究旨在比较一期与二期重建 MLKI 的疗效:这项回顾性比较研究于 2020 年 7 月至 2023 年 12 月在尼日利亚一家政府骨科医院进行。纳入标准包括年龄在 18 至 45 岁之间、接受过一期或二期膝关节重建术的 MLKI 男性和女性患者,并进行了至少 12 个月的随访。排除标准包括年龄在 18 岁以下和 45 岁以上的患者、曾接受过膝关节手术的患者、股骨或胫骨骨折患者、有骨关节炎放射学证据的患者以及随访时间少于 12 个月的患者。采用 Lysholm 评分系统记录临床结果和并发症发生率。统计分析采用 SPSS 23 版本:研究了 51 例患者(OS 组 26 例,TS 组 25 例)。两组患者术前和术后的 Lysholm 评分有明显差异(OS 组和 TS 组的 P = 0.86 和 0.57)。然而,两组患者术后的 Lysholm 评分无明显差异(P = 0.918):结论:慢性 MLKI 的一期重建和二期重建具有相似的良好临床效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信