Timothy C Olsen, Jonnby S LaGuardia, David R Chen, Ryan S Lebens, Kelly X Huang, David Milek, Mark Noble, Jonathan I Leckenby
{"title":"Influencing factors and repair advancements in rodent models of peripheral nerve regeneration.","authors":"Timothy C Olsen, Jonnby S LaGuardia, David R Chen, Ryan S Lebens, Kelly X Huang, David Milek, Mark Noble, Jonathan I Leckenby","doi":"10.1080/17460751.2024.2405318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peripheral nerve injuries lead to severe functional impairments, with rodent models essential for studying regeneration. This review examines key factors affecting outcomes. Age-related declines, like reduced nerve fiber density and impaired axonal transport of vesicles, hinder recovery. Hormonal differences influence regeneration, with BDNF/trkB critical for testosterone and nerve growth factor for estrogen signaling pathways. Species and strain selection impact outcomes, with C57BL/6 mice and Sprague-Dawley rats exhibiting varying regenerative capacities. Injury models - crush for early regeneration, chronic constriction for neuropathic pain, stretch for traumatic elongation and transection for severe lacerations - provide insights into clinically relevant scenarios. Repair techniques, such as nerve grafts and conduits, show that autografts are the gold standard for gaps over 3 cm, with success influenced by graft type and diameter. Time course analysis highlights crucial early degeneration and regeneration phases within the first month, with functional recovery stabilizing by three to six months. Early intervention optimizes regeneration by reducing scar tissue formation, while later interventions focus on remyelination. Understanding these factors is vital for designing robust preclinical studies and translating research into effective clinical treatments for peripheral nerve injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":21043,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"561-577"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460751.2024.2405318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injuries lead to severe functional impairments, with rodent models essential for studying regeneration. This review examines key factors affecting outcomes. Age-related declines, like reduced nerve fiber density and impaired axonal transport of vesicles, hinder recovery. Hormonal differences influence regeneration, with BDNF/trkB critical for testosterone and nerve growth factor for estrogen signaling pathways. Species and strain selection impact outcomes, with C57BL/6 mice and Sprague-Dawley rats exhibiting varying regenerative capacities. Injury models - crush for early regeneration, chronic constriction for neuropathic pain, stretch for traumatic elongation and transection for severe lacerations - provide insights into clinically relevant scenarios. Repair techniques, such as nerve grafts and conduits, show that autografts are the gold standard for gaps over 3 cm, with success influenced by graft type and diameter. Time course analysis highlights crucial early degeneration and regeneration phases within the first month, with functional recovery stabilizing by three to six months. Early intervention optimizes regeneration by reducing scar tissue formation, while later interventions focus on remyelination. Understanding these factors is vital for designing robust preclinical studies and translating research into effective clinical treatments for peripheral nerve injuries.
期刊介绍:
Regenerative medicine replaces or regenerates human cells, tissue or organs, to restore or establish normal function*. Since 2006, Regenerative Medicine has been at the forefront of publishing the very best papers and reviews covering the entire regenerative medicine sector. The journal focusses on the entire spectrum of approaches to regenerative medicine, including small molecule drugs, biologics, biomaterials and tissue engineering, and cell and gene therapies – it’s all about regeneration and not a specific platform technology. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of the sector ranging from discovery research, through to clinical development, through to commercialization. Regenerative Medicine uniquely supports this important area of biomedical science and healthcare by providing a peer-reviewed journal totally committed to publishing the very best regenerative medicine research, clinical translation and commercialization.
Regenerative Medicine provides a specialist forum to address the important challenges and advances in regenerative medicine, delivering this essential information in concise, clear and attractive article formats – vital to a rapidly growing, multidisciplinary and increasingly time-constrained community.
Despite substantial developments in our knowledge and understanding of regeneration, the field is still in its infancy. However, progress is accelerating. The next few decades will see the discovery and development of transformative therapies for patients, and in some cases, even cures. Regenerative Medicine will continue to provide a critical overview of these advances as they progress, undergo clinical trials, and eventually become mainstream medicine.