COVID-19's Effect on Practice Quality Improvement and Transformation Activities: Practice Survey Results.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Suzanne Felt-Lisk, Jesse Chandler, Angela Merrill, Shawan Johnson, Damian Everhart, Robert Flemming
{"title":"COVID-19's Effect on Practice Quality Improvement and Transformation Activities: Practice Survey Results.","authors":"Suzanne Felt-Lisk, Jesse Chandler, Angela Merrill, Shawan Johnson, Damian Everhart, Robert Flemming","doi":"10.1097/QMH.0000000000000472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The Transforming Clinical Practices Initiative (TCPI) was a 4-year, large-scale, collaborative, peer-based learning initiative for physician practices of all specialties with broad goals to improve the quality of patient care, spend health care dollars more wisely, and assist practices in being ready to succeed under value-based payment (VBP). We investigated whether the COVID-19 pandemic had erased or diminished practice transformation progress made during the TCPI program period, through a follow-up survey of participating practices fielded in October 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2021 to April 2022, we surveyed a probability sample of 2207 primary care and specialty practices that participated in the TCPI, receiving 610 responses. We asked about practice characteristics, financial and ownership stability, clinical performance, and quality improvement efforts, both now and prior to COVID-19. The COVID-19 content was part of a larger survey. Responses were weighted to account for sample selection, unknown eligibility status, and nonresponse. We generated weighted univariate descriptive statistics representative of practices with clinicians enrolled in TCPI. These estimated percentages have a 95% confidence interval of about ±5%. Multivariate analysis of unweighted data examined associations between practice characteristics and other variables of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For all but one of 13 practice transformation activities engaged in prior to the COVID-19 public health emergency, a majority of practices (at least 52%) reported that the progress on these activities were either not hurt or were helped by their COVID-19 experience. Compared to January 2020, only about 7% of practices reported that their quality of care or clinical performance was worse due to COVID-19, and 32% reported that their quality of care was better. More rural than urban practices reported that half or more of their transformation activities were hurt by COVID-19 (29% and 14%, respectively). Physician-owned practices were more likely to report quality is better today than prior to COVID-19 relative to practices with other ownership types such as hospitals or health systems (43% vs 24%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most practices have been able to recover from the deep stress of the COVID-19 pandemic and continue their efforts to improve patient care and performance to succeed under VBP. These results suggest a high perceived return on investment in value-readiness support along with emergency financial support in times of crisis, as well as room to continue preparation for any future pandemic and the national movement toward increased VBP, especially in rural settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20986,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The Transforming Clinical Practices Initiative (TCPI) was a 4-year, large-scale, collaborative, peer-based learning initiative for physician practices of all specialties with broad goals to improve the quality of patient care, spend health care dollars more wisely, and assist practices in being ready to succeed under value-based payment (VBP). We investigated whether the COVID-19 pandemic had erased or diminished practice transformation progress made during the TCPI program period, through a follow-up survey of participating practices fielded in October 2021.

Methods: In October 2021 to April 2022, we surveyed a probability sample of 2207 primary care and specialty practices that participated in the TCPI, receiving 610 responses. We asked about practice characteristics, financial and ownership stability, clinical performance, and quality improvement efforts, both now and prior to COVID-19. The COVID-19 content was part of a larger survey. Responses were weighted to account for sample selection, unknown eligibility status, and nonresponse. We generated weighted univariate descriptive statistics representative of practices with clinicians enrolled in TCPI. These estimated percentages have a 95% confidence interval of about ±5%. Multivariate analysis of unweighted data examined associations between practice characteristics and other variables of interest.

Results: For all but one of 13 practice transformation activities engaged in prior to the COVID-19 public health emergency, a majority of practices (at least 52%) reported that the progress on these activities were either not hurt or were helped by their COVID-19 experience. Compared to January 2020, only about 7% of practices reported that their quality of care or clinical performance was worse due to COVID-19, and 32% reported that their quality of care was better. More rural than urban practices reported that half or more of their transformation activities were hurt by COVID-19 (29% and 14%, respectively). Physician-owned practices were more likely to report quality is better today than prior to COVID-19 relative to practices with other ownership types such as hospitals or health systems (43% vs 24%).

Conclusion: Most practices have been able to recover from the deep stress of the COVID-19 pandemic and continue their efforts to improve patient care and performance to succeed under VBP. These results suggest a high perceived return on investment in value-readiness support along with emergency financial support in times of crisis, as well as room to continue preparation for any future pandemic and the national movement toward increased VBP, especially in rural settings.

COVID-19 对实践质量改进和转型活动的影响:实践调查结果。
背景和目标:临床实践转型计划(TCPI)是一项为期 4 年、大规模、协作式、基于同行的学习计划,面向所有专科的医生实践,其广泛目标是提高患者护理质量、更明智地使用医疗费用,并协助实践为在基于价值的支付(VBP)中取得成功做好准备。我们于 2021 年 10 月对参与项目的医疗机构进行了跟踪调查,以了解 COVID-19 大流行是否抹杀或削弱了 TCPI 项目期间取得的实践转型进展:2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 4 月,我们对参与 TCPI 的 2207 家初级保健和专科诊所进行了概率抽样调查,共收到 610 份回复。我们询问了目前和 COVID-19 之前的医疗机构特征、财务和所有权稳定性、临床绩效和质量改进工作。COVID-19 的内容是更大规模调查的一部分。我们对回答进行了加权处理,以考虑到样本选择、未知资格状态和无回复等因素。我们生成了加权单变量描述性统计数据,这些数据代表了临床医生加入 TCPI 的实践情况。这些估计百分比的 95% 置信区间约为±5%。对未加权数据的多变量分析检验了实践特征与其他相关变量之间的关联:在 COVID-19 公共卫生突发事件之前开展的 13 项实践转型活动中,除一项活动外,大多数实践活动(至少 52%)都报告说,COVID-19 的经验要么没有影响这些活动的进展,要么对这些活动有所帮助。与 2020 年 1 月相比,只有约 7% 的医疗机构表示 COVID-19 导致其医疗质量或临床表现下降,32% 的医疗机构表示其医疗质量有所提高。与城市医疗机构相比,更多的农村医疗机构表示其一半或更多的转型活动受到了 COVID-19 的影响(分别为 29% 和 14%)。与医院或医疗系统等其他所有制类型的医疗机构相比(43% 对 24%),医生所有的医疗机构更有可能报告目前的医疗质量优于 COVID-19 之前:大多数医疗机构都能从 COVID-19 的巨大压力中恢复过来,并继续努力改善患者护理和绩效,从而在 VBP 下取得成功。这些结果表明,对价值准备支持的投资回报率很高,同时在危机时期还能获得紧急财政支持,并有余力继续为未来的大流行和全国性的 VBP 提升运动做好准备,尤其是在农村地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality Management in Health Care
Quality Management in Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Quality Management in Health Care (QMHC) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for our readers to explore the theoretical, technical, and strategic elements of health care quality management. The journal''s primary focus is on organizational structure and processes as these affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. In particular, it: -Builds knowledge about the application of statistical tools, control charts, benchmarking, and other devices used in the ongoing monitoring and evaluation of care and of patient outcomes; -Encourages research in and evaluation of the results of various organizational strategies designed to bring about quantifiable improvements in patient outcomes; -Fosters the application of quality management science to patient care processes and clinical decision-making; -Fosters cooperation and communication among health care providers, payers and regulators in their efforts to improve the quality of patient outcomes; -Explores links among the various clinical, technical, administrative, and managerial disciplines involved in patient care, as well as the role and responsibilities of organizational governance in ongoing quality management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信