Treatment Preferences in Acute Psychosis: A Comparison of Patient and Staff Perspectives on Symptom Prioritization and Biopsychosocial Interventions.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Rabea Fischer, Steffen Moritz, Jakob Scheunemann, Matthias Nagel, Charlotte Osthues, Daniel Schöttle, Daniel Luedecke
{"title":"Treatment Preferences in Acute Psychosis: A Comparison of Patient and Staff Perspectives on Symptom Prioritization and Biopsychosocial Interventions.","authors":"Rabea Fischer, Steffen Moritz, Jakob Scheunemann, Matthias Nagel, Charlotte Osthues, Daniel Schöttle, Daniel Luedecke","doi":"10.1007/s11126-024-10099-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with acute psychosis are often confronted with the prejudice that they refuse all treatment due to lack of insight. This study examined and compared the aims and preferences for treatment of patients with acute psychosis and of psychiatric inpatient staff. A total of 142 inpatients being treated for a psychotic disorder on either a locked or an open ward indicated which of a range of symptoms they want to be treated and which of various biopsychosocial treatment options they would like to receive. Staff members from the same wards reported which psychiatric symptoms they deemed relevant in the treatment of psychosis and which treatment options should be offered. Patients assigned the highest treatment need to neurocognitive symptoms, followed by affective and positive symptoms. In contrast, staff assigned the highest treatment need to positive symptoms, followed by neurocognitive and affective symptoms. Patients and staff on open wards expressed more treatment needs overall than did patients and staff on locked wards. Patients' desire for treatment differed across treatment types. In comparing patients on locked versus open wards, patients on open wards expressed higher approval of medication than patients on locked wards. Even patients with highly acute psychosis being treated on locked psychiatric wards endorsed treatment. Treatment preferences of this group deviated markedly in some instances from staffs' preferences. Considering their specific needs may contribute to increasing patient self-efficacy, and improving adherence to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20658,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-024-10099-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with acute psychosis are often confronted with the prejudice that they refuse all treatment due to lack of insight. This study examined and compared the aims and preferences for treatment of patients with acute psychosis and of psychiatric inpatient staff. A total of 142 inpatients being treated for a psychotic disorder on either a locked or an open ward indicated which of a range of symptoms they want to be treated and which of various biopsychosocial treatment options they would like to receive. Staff members from the same wards reported which psychiatric symptoms they deemed relevant in the treatment of psychosis and which treatment options should be offered. Patients assigned the highest treatment need to neurocognitive symptoms, followed by affective and positive symptoms. In contrast, staff assigned the highest treatment need to positive symptoms, followed by neurocognitive and affective symptoms. Patients and staff on open wards expressed more treatment needs overall than did patients and staff on locked wards. Patients' desire for treatment differed across treatment types. In comparing patients on locked versus open wards, patients on open wards expressed higher approval of medication than patients on locked wards. Even patients with highly acute psychosis being treated on locked psychiatric wards endorsed treatment. Treatment preferences of this group deviated markedly in some instances from staffs' preferences. Considering their specific needs may contribute to increasing patient self-efficacy, and improving adherence to treatment.

急性精神病的治疗偏好:患者和医护人员对症状优先级和生物心理社会干预的观点比较。
急性精神病患者经常会面临一种偏见,认为他们因缺乏洞察力而拒绝一切治疗。这项研究考察并比较了急性精神病患者和精神科住院病人的治疗目的和偏好。共有 142 名在封闭病房或开放病房接受治疗的精神病住院患者表示,他们希望治疗一系列症状中的哪些症状,以及希望接受各种生物-心理-社会治疗方案中的哪些方案。同一病房的工作人员也报告了他们认为哪些精神病症状与治疗精神病相关,以及应该提供哪些治疗方案。患者认为神经认知症状最需要治疗,其次是情感症状和阳性症状。相比之下,工作人员认为阳性症状的治疗需求最大,其次是神经认知症状和情感症状。开放式病房的患者和工作人员比封闭式病房的患者和工作人员表达了更多的治疗需求。不同治疗类型的病人对治疗的渴望也不同。在比较上锁病房和开放式病房的病人时,开放式病房的病人比上锁病房的病人更认可药物治疗。即使是在上锁的精神病院接受治疗的高度急性精神病患者也认可治疗。在某些情况下,这部分患者的治疗偏好与工作人员的偏好存在明显偏差。考虑他们的特殊需求可能有助于提高患者的自我效能感,并改善治疗的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatric Quarterly
Psychiatric Quarterly PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Psychiatric Quarterly publishes original research, theoretical papers, and review articles on the assessment, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons with psychiatric disabilities, with emphasis on care provided in public, community, and private institutional settings such as hospitals, schools, and correctional facilities. Qualitative and quantitative studies concerning the social, clinical, administrative, legal, political, and ethical aspects of mental health care fall within the scope of the journal. Content areas include, but are not limited to, evidence-based practice in prevention, diagnosis, and management of psychiatric disorders; interface of psychiatry with primary and specialty medicine; disparities of access and outcomes in health care service delivery; and socio-cultural and cross-cultural aspects of mental health and wellness, including mental health literacy. 5 Year Impact Factor: 1.023 (2007) Section ''Psychiatry'': Rank 70 out of 82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信