A bibliometric and visualization analysis of global trends and frontiers on macrophages in abdominal aortic aneurysms research.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Liang Zhang, Dongyu Li, Shiyang Bao
{"title":"A bibliometric and visualization analysis of global trends and frontiers on macrophages in abdominal aortic aneurysms research.","authors":"Liang Zhang, Dongyu Li, Shiyang Bao","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000040274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Macrophages are key regulators of the inflammatory and innate immune responses. Researchers have shown that aberrant expression of macrophages contributes to the development of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). However, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis exploring the research status and knowledge mapping of this area is lacking. This study aimed to explore the research status, knowledge mapping and hotspots of macrophages in AAA research from a bibliometric perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we retrieved articles published between 2000 and 2022 on macrophages associated with AAA research from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. The retrieved literature data were further analyzed using Citespace and VOSviewer software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 918 qualified publications related to AAA-associated macrophages were retrieved. The number of publications in this field has been increasing annually. China and the United States were the 2 main drivers in this field, contributing to more than 64% of the publications. In addition, the US had the most publications, top institutions, and expert researchers, dominating in research on macrophages in AAA. The Harvard University was the most productive institution, with 60 publications. The journal with the most publications was Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (86). Daugherty Alan was the most prolific author (28 publications) and he was also the most cited co- author. Furthermore, the exploration of established animal models, macrophage-related inflammatory-microenvironment, macrophage-related immune mechanism, clinical translation and molecular imaging research remained future research directions in this field.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings offered new insights for scholars in this field. They will help researchers explore new directions for their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11521088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000040274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Macrophages are key regulators of the inflammatory and innate immune responses. Researchers have shown that aberrant expression of macrophages contributes to the development of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). However, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis exploring the research status and knowledge mapping of this area is lacking. This study aimed to explore the research status, knowledge mapping and hotspots of macrophages in AAA research from a bibliometric perspective.

Methods: In this study, we retrieved articles published between 2000 and 2022 on macrophages associated with AAA research from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. The retrieved literature data were further analyzed using Citespace and VOSviewer software.

Results: A total of 918 qualified publications related to AAA-associated macrophages were retrieved. The number of publications in this field has been increasing annually. China and the United States were the 2 main drivers in this field, contributing to more than 64% of the publications. In addition, the US had the most publications, top institutions, and expert researchers, dominating in research on macrophages in AAA. The Harvard University was the most productive institution, with 60 publications. The journal with the most publications was Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (86). Daugherty Alan was the most prolific author (28 publications) and he was also the most cited co- author. Furthermore, the exploration of established animal models, macrophage-related inflammatory-microenvironment, macrophage-related immune mechanism, clinical translation and molecular imaging research remained future research directions in this field.

Conclusions: Our findings offered new insights for scholars in this field. They will help researchers explore new directions for their work.

对腹主动脉瘤研究中巨噬细胞的全球趋势和前沿进行文献计量和可视化分析。
背景:巨噬细胞是炎症和先天性免疫反应的关键调节因子。研究人员发现,巨噬细胞的异常表达会导致腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的发生。然而,目前还缺乏对这一领域的研究现状和知识图谱进行全面的文献计量分析。本研究旨在从文献计量学的角度探讨AAA研究中巨噬细胞的研究现状、知识图谱和研究热点:本研究从 Web of Science Core Collection(WoSCC)数据库中检索了 2000 年至 2022 年间发表的与 AAA 研究相关的巨噬细胞方面的文章。我们使用 Citespace 和 VOSviewer 软件对检索到的文献数据进行了进一步分析:结果:共检索到 918 篇与 AAA 相关巨噬细胞有关的合格文献。该领域的文献数量呈逐年上升趋势。中国和美国是这一领域的两大主要推动者,发表了超过 64% 的论文。此外,美国的论文数量、顶尖机构和专家研究人员最多,在 AAA 中巨噬细胞的研究中占据主导地位。哈佛大学是发表论文最多的机构,共发表了60篇论文。发表论文最多的期刊是《动脉硬化、血栓和血管生物学》(86 篇)。Daugherty Alan是发表论文最多的作者(28篇),他也是被引用次数最多的共同作者。此外,对已建立的动物模型、巨噬细胞相关炎症微环境、巨噬细胞相关免疫机制、临床转化和分子成像研究的探索仍是该领域未来的研究方向:我们的研究结果为该领域的学者提供了新的见解。结论:我们的研究结果为该领域的学者提供了新的见解,有助于研究人员探索新的工作方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信