Co-use of psychedelics with other substances: Findings from the global psychedelic survey.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stephanie Lake, Philippe Lucas
{"title":"Co-use of psychedelics with other substances: Findings from the global psychedelic survey.","authors":"Stephanie Lake, Philippe Lucas","doi":"10.1177/02698811241292956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>While most psychedelic substances are considered to carry a relatively low risk of acute or long-term harm, co-use with other psychoactive substances may increase health and social harm. Using a large international survey of adults who use psychedelics, we sought to comprehensively characterize psychedelic co-use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the 2023 Global Psychedelic Survey, a web-based survey of adults ⩾21 with lifetime use of psychedelics. We explored patterns of co-use (prevalence, secondary substances used, timing, and motives of co-use) and examined sociodemographic and psychedelic use-related characteristics associated with co-use overall and by specific psychedelics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 5370 respondents were included in this analysis, of whom 3228 (56.3%) reported typically co-using at least one of the 11 psychedelic substances of interest, with co-use lowest for ayahuasca (14.8%) and highest for nitrous oxide (54.5%). Cannabis and alcohol were the most common secondary substances. Depressants were the only secondary substance class that increased in use following psychedelic experiences. Greater experience with psychedelics was significantly associated with co-use, as was using for recreational purposes or to reduce/substitute the use of other substances. Personal exploration and therapeutic purposes for psychedelic use were negatively associated with co-use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this detailed analysis of psychedelic co-use, we observed high rates of co-use with certain psychedelics, specifically when used recreationally. Our findings highlight psychedelic-specific consumers for whom harm reduction messaging around co-use practices may be best tailored. Further research is justified to assess whether specific patterns of co-use might reduce or increase potential harms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"2698811241292956"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811241292956","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: While most psychedelic substances are considered to carry a relatively low risk of acute or long-term harm, co-use with other psychoactive substances may increase health and social harm. Using a large international survey of adults who use psychedelics, we sought to comprehensively characterize psychedelic co-use.

Methods: We used data from the 2023 Global Psychedelic Survey, a web-based survey of adults ⩾21 with lifetime use of psychedelics. We explored patterns of co-use (prevalence, secondary substances used, timing, and motives of co-use) and examined sociodemographic and psychedelic use-related characteristics associated with co-use overall and by specific psychedelics.

Results: In total, 5370 respondents were included in this analysis, of whom 3228 (56.3%) reported typically co-using at least one of the 11 psychedelic substances of interest, with co-use lowest for ayahuasca (14.8%) and highest for nitrous oxide (54.5%). Cannabis and alcohol were the most common secondary substances. Depressants were the only secondary substance class that increased in use following psychedelic experiences. Greater experience with psychedelics was significantly associated with co-use, as was using for recreational purposes or to reduce/substitute the use of other substances. Personal exploration and therapeutic purposes for psychedelic use were negatively associated with co-use.

Conclusions: In this detailed analysis of psychedelic co-use, we observed high rates of co-use with certain psychedelics, specifically when used recreationally. Our findings highlight psychedelic-specific consumers for whom harm reduction messaging around co-use practices may be best tailored. Further research is justified to assess whether specific patterns of co-use might reduce or increase potential harms.

迷幻药与其他药物的共同使用:全球迷幻药调查的结果。
背景/目的:虽然大多数迷幻药被认为具有相对较低的急性或长期危害风险,但与其他精神活性物质共同使用可能会增加健康和社会危害。通过对使用迷幻药的成年人进行大规模国际调查,我们试图全面描述迷幻药共同使用的特点:我们使用了 2023 年全球迷幻药调查的数据,这是一项针对 21 岁以下终生使用迷幻药的成年人的网络调查。我们探讨了共同使用的模式(流行率、使用的辅助物质、时间和共同使用的动机),并研究了与共同使用总体情况和特定迷幻剂相关的社会人口学特征和迷幻剂使用相关特征:共有 5370 名受访者参与了此次分析,其中 3228 人(56.3%)报告通常会共同使用 11 种相关迷幻药中的至少一种,共同使用率最低的是死藤水(14.8%),最高的是氧化亚氮(54.5%)。大麻和酒精是最常见的辅助药物。抑制剂是唯一一类在迷幻体验后使用量增加的辅助药物。更多的迷幻药使用经历与共同使用迷幻药有很大关系,出于娱乐目的使用迷幻药或减少/替代使用其他药物也与共同使用迷幻药有很大关系。个人探索和治疗目的的迷幻药使用与共同使用呈负相关:在这项关于迷幻药共同使用的详细分析中,我们观察到某些迷幻药的共同使用率很高,特别是在娱乐性使用时。我们的研究结果强调了特定的迷幻药消费者,对他们来说,围绕共同使用行为的减低伤害信息可能是最合适的。有必要开展进一步研究,以评估特定的共同使用模式是否会减少或增加潜在危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信