Success of Nonsurgical Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth with Complex Restorative/Prosthodontic Treatments: A Retrospective Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Mohammadreza Vatankhah, Hengameh Ashraf, Forough Jamalian, Sepehr Talebi, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Kamyar Khosravi, Nazanin Zargar
{"title":"Success of Nonsurgical Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth with Complex Restorative/Prosthodontic Treatments: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Mohammadreza Vatankhah, Hengameh Ashraf, Forough Jamalian, Sepehr Talebi, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Kamyar Khosravi, Nazanin Zargar","doi":"10.22037/iej.v19i4.43587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endodontic therapy has been regarded as a safe treatment option with highly promising results in preserving natural teeth. Numerous factors may influence the longevity of endodontically treated teeth (ETT), thus altering their success/survival rate. This study aimed to determine the survival and success rates of endodontically treated premolars and molars with different complex restorative/prosthodontic treatments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 190 patients with an ETT were included, who had received final coronal restoration up to 14 days after the temporary one and at least one year prior to the enrollment. The investigator evaluated the quality of endodontic filling, coronal restoration, mobility, and proximal contacts. Data were analyzed with multiple binary logistic regression and the Chi-Square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average duration of follow-up was 28.6±11.9 months. Overall, 89.4% (170/190) of the teeth survived. The overall success rate for the investigated teeth was 70.5% (134/190). Success rates of 100% for crown, 95.7% for post and core crown (PCC), and 94.7% for amalgam build-up with post were achieved. However, the success rates were 75%, 52.5%, and 50% for amalgam build-up, composite build-up, and PCC with crown lengthening, respectively. The Chi-square test revealed that there was a significant difference between the different restorations in terms of success (<i>P</i><0.001). Multiple binary logistic regression models revealed that coronal leakage (<i>P</i>=0.048), obturation void (<i>P</i>=0.037), obturation length (<i>P</i>=0.020), mobility (<i>P</i>=0.002), type of the restoration (<i>P</i><0.001), and proximal contact (<i>P</i><0.001) were significant predictors for success. However, apical lucency, root length, marginal caries, tooth type, and post did not appear to be significant indicators of success (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ETT with minimal mobility, exhibiting underfilled obturations without visible voids, and having received crown/PCC/amalgam build-up with a post, along with the presence of both proximal contacts, tend to exhibit a significantly high success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":14534,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","volume":"19 4","pages":"263-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v19i4.43587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endodontic therapy has been regarded as a safe treatment option with highly promising results in preserving natural teeth. Numerous factors may influence the longevity of endodontically treated teeth (ETT), thus altering their success/survival rate. This study aimed to determine the survival and success rates of endodontically treated premolars and molars with different complex restorative/prosthodontic treatments.

Materials and methods: A total of 190 patients with an ETT were included, who had received final coronal restoration up to 14 days after the temporary one and at least one year prior to the enrollment. The investigator evaluated the quality of endodontic filling, coronal restoration, mobility, and proximal contacts. Data were analyzed with multiple binary logistic regression and the Chi-Square test.

Results: The average duration of follow-up was 28.6±11.9 months. Overall, 89.4% (170/190) of the teeth survived. The overall success rate for the investigated teeth was 70.5% (134/190). Success rates of 100% for crown, 95.7% for post and core crown (PCC), and 94.7% for amalgam build-up with post were achieved. However, the success rates were 75%, 52.5%, and 50% for amalgam build-up, composite build-up, and PCC with crown lengthening, respectively. The Chi-square test revealed that there was a significant difference between the different restorations in terms of success (P<0.001). Multiple binary logistic regression models revealed that coronal leakage (P=0.048), obturation void (P=0.037), obturation length (P=0.020), mobility (P=0.002), type of the restoration (P<0.001), and proximal contact (P<0.001) were significant predictors for success. However, apical lucency, root length, marginal caries, tooth type, and post did not appear to be significant indicators of success (P>0.05).

Conclusions: ETT with minimal mobility, exhibiting underfilled obturations without visible voids, and having received crown/PCC/amalgam build-up with a post, along with the presence of both proximal contacts, tend to exhibit a significantly high success rate.

非手术根管治疗后牙复杂修复/口腔正畸治疗的成功案例:回顾性研究
导言:牙髓治疗一直被认为是一种安全的治疗方法,在保护天然牙齿方面具有很好的效果。许多因素可能会影响牙髓治疗牙齿(ETT)的寿命,从而改变其成功率/存活率。本研究旨在确定采用不同复杂修复/正畸治疗方法进行牙髓治疗的前磨牙和磨牙的存活率和成功率:共纳入了 190 名接受过 ETT 的患者,这些患者在临时修复后 14 天内接受了最终冠修复,并在入组前至少一年接受过修复。研究人员评估了牙髓充填、冠修复、活动度和近端接触的质量。数据分析采用多元二元逻辑回归和 Chi-Square 检验:平均随访时间为 28.6±11.9 个月。总体而言,89.4%(170/190)的牙齿存活。调查牙齿的总体成功率为 70.5%(134/190)。牙冠的成功率为 100%,桩核牙冠 (PCC) 的成功率为 95.7%,带桩汞合金修复的成功率为 94.7%。然而,汞合金嵌体、复合材料嵌体和带牙冠延长的 PCC 的成功率分别为 75%、52.5% 和 50%。Chi-square检验显示,不同修复体在成功率(PP=0.048)、封闭空隙(P=0.037)、封闭长度(P=0.020)、移动性(P=0.002)、修复体类型(PPP>0.05)方面存在显著差异:活动度小、充填不足、无明显空隙、接受过牙冠/PCC/汞合金桩修复以及存在两个近端接触点的 ETT 成功率明显较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Iranian Endodontic Journal
Iranian Endodontic Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Endodontic Journal (IEJ) is an international peer-reviewed biomedical publication, the aim of which is to provide a scientific medium of communication for researchers throughout the globe. IEJ aims to publish the highest quality articles, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of Endodontics. The journal is an official Journal of the Iranian Center for Endodontic Research (ICER) and the Iranian Association of Endodontists (IAE). The Journal welcomes articles related to the scientific or applied aspects of endodontics e.g. original researches, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, review articles, clinical trials, case series/reports, hypotheses, letters to the editor, etc. From the beginning (i.e. since 2006), the IEJ was the first open access endodontic journal in the world, which gave readers free and instant access to published articles and enabling them faster discovery of the latest endodontic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信