Early identification of potential occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a systematic review.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Nyasha Makaruse, Mike R D Maslin, Ziva Shai Campbell
{"title":"Early identification of potential occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a systematic review.","authors":"Nyasha Makaruse, Mike R D Maslin, Ziva Shai Campbell","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2418354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review addressed two questions: <i>1) For which audiometric test frequencies or pure tone averages are hearing threshold levels (HTLs) most susceptible to early occupational noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) before significant damage? 2) Which early flag metric best detects early hearing shifts due to noise for occupational NIHL surveillance?</i></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Embase from July 2021 to May 2024. Eligibility was screened by two independent reviewers using Covidence. HTL results were analysed for susceptibility to noise-induced changes, and sensitivity and specificity of early flag metrics were assessed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Of 175 studies retrieved, 18 met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies emphasised the importance of testing at frequencies above 8 kHz, with HTLs at 12, 14, and 16 kHz frequently identified as the most noise susceptible. Conventional frequencies of 3-6 kHz were also noted as susceptible. NIOSH and OSHA metrics had low sensitivity and specificity, but modifications improved their performance to 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review highlights the need to refine current metrics and explore extended high frequencies for NIHL monitoring. Research is required to determine frequencies for warning metrics and sensitive metrics for early occupational NIHL detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2418354","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review addressed two questions: 1) For which audiometric test frequencies or pure tone averages are hearing threshold levels (HTLs) most susceptible to early occupational noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) before significant damage? 2) Which early flag metric best detects early hearing shifts due to noise for occupational NIHL surveillance?

Design: Systematic searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Embase from July 2021 to May 2024. Eligibility was screened by two independent reviewers using Covidence. HTL results were analysed for susceptibility to noise-induced changes, and sensitivity and specificity of early flag metrics were assessed.

Study sample: Of 175 studies retrieved, 18 met the inclusion criteria.

Results: Ten studies emphasised the importance of testing at frequencies above 8 kHz, with HTLs at 12, 14, and 16 kHz frequently identified as the most noise susceptible. Conventional frequencies of 3-6 kHz were also noted as susceptible. NIOSH and OSHA metrics had low sensitivity and specificity, but modifications improved their performance to 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity.

Conclusion: The review highlights the need to refine current metrics and explore extended high frequencies for NIHL monitoring. Research is required to determine frequencies for warning metrics and sensitive metrics for early occupational NIHL detection.

早期识别潜在的职业噪声引起的听力损失:系统综述。
目的本系统综述探讨了两个问题:1)对于哪些听力测试频率或纯音平均值,听力阈值水平(HTLs)最容易受到早期职业性噪声诱发听力损失(NIHL)的影响,而不会造成重大损害?2)在职业性 NIHL 监测中,哪种早期标志指标最能检测出噪声导致的早期听力损失?从 2021 年 7 月至 2024 年 5 月,在 Ovid MEDLINE(R) 和 Embase 中进行了系统检索。由两名独立审稿人使用 Covidence 进行资格筛选。对高密度脂蛋白检测结果进行了分析,以确定其是否易受噪声引起的变化影响,并评估了早期标志指标的敏感性和特异性:研究样本:在检索到的 175 项研究中,有 18 项符合纳入标准:结果:10 项研究强调了在 8 kHz 以上频率进行测试的重要性,其中 12、14 和 16 kHz 的 HTL 经常被认为是最易受噪声影响的频率。3-6 千赫的传统频率也被认为是易受影响的频率。NIOSH 和 OSHA 指标的灵敏度和特异性较低,但经过修改后,其灵敏度和特异性分别提高到 100%和 98%:综述强调有必要完善当前的衡量标准,并探索用于监测 NIHL 的扩展高频率。需要开展研究,以确定预警指标的频率和早期职业性 NIHL 检测的敏感指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信