Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa, Flavia Zeneli, Martina Mazzucco, Benedetta Barbieri, Mario Rietjens, Germana Lissidini, Valeriano Vinci, Michele Bartoletti, Alessandra Belati, Davide Bavaro
{"title":"Microbiology of periprosthetic infections following implant-based breast reconstruction surgery: a multicentric retrospective study.","authors":"Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa, Flavia Zeneli, Martina Mazzucco, Benedetta Barbieri, Mario Rietjens, Germana Lissidini, Valeriano Vinci, Michele Bartoletti, Alessandra Belati, Davide Bavaro","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the predominant breast reconstruction technique post-mastectomy, with bacterial infections being a significant complication affecting patient recovery and quality of life. The following study aimed to determine the microbiological features of the causative agents responsible for breast implant infections, with more attention paid to the comparative analysis of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and their presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 214 patients who presented with periprosthetic infection and underwent implant removal following implant-based breast reconstruction at Humanitas Research Hospital and Istituto Europeo di Oncologia between January 2018 and March 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed that Gram-positive bacteria were more prevalent, with <i>Staphylococcus</i> species, particularly <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, being the most isolated pathogen in both institutions (∼39.96%). In contrast, Gram-negative bacteria were less frequent, with a higher proportion of these pathogens being multi-resistant strains. A significant difference was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.007), indicating that individuals with normal BMI have a higher prevalence of Gram-positive infections (88.46%), whereas obese and overweight patients had higher proportions of Gram-negative infections (23.53% and 28.89%, respectively). In addition, smoking status was also significantly associated with pathogen distribution (<i>p</i> = 0.032), with active and past smokers being related to higher percentages of polymicrobial infections. Furthermore, positive prophylactic MSSA/MRSA swabs were significantly more associated with <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> infections compared to those with negative results (<i>p</i> = <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gram-positive bacteria, especially <i>Staphylococcus</i> species, dominate the microbiological landscape of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) infections. Our findings provide insights into this critical issue, facilitating a more precise choice of empiric antibiotic treatment and prevention strategies. This analysis underscores the necessity for prophylactic protocols and therapeutic approaches tailored to the predominant bacterial groups. Further research is needed to explore long-term trends and resistance mechanisms to improve patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12564,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Surgery","volume":"11 ","pages":"1477023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1477023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the predominant breast reconstruction technique post-mastectomy, with bacterial infections being a significant complication affecting patient recovery and quality of life. The following study aimed to determine the microbiological features of the causative agents responsible for breast implant infections, with more attention paid to the comparative analysis of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and their presentation.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 214 patients who presented with periprosthetic infection and underwent implant removal following implant-based breast reconstruction at Humanitas Research Hospital and Istituto Europeo di Oncologia between January 2018 and March 2024.
Results: The study revealed that Gram-positive bacteria were more prevalent, with Staphylococcus species, particularly Staphylococcus aureus, being the most isolated pathogen in both institutions (∼39.96%). In contrast, Gram-negative bacteria were less frequent, with a higher proportion of these pathogens being multi-resistant strains. A significant difference was observed (p = 0.007), indicating that individuals with normal BMI have a higher prevalence of Gram-positive infections (88.46%), whereas obese and overweight patients had higher proportions of Gram-negative infections (23.53% and 28.89%, respectively). In addition, smoking status was also significantly associated with pathogen distribution (p = 0.032), with active and past smokers being related to higher percentages of polymicrobial infections. Furthermore, positive prophylactic MSSA/MRSA swabs were significantly more associated with Staphylococcus aureus infections compared to those with negative results (p = <0.001).
Conclusions: Gram-positive bacteria, especially Staphylococcus species, dominate the microbiological landscape of implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) infections. Our findings provide insights into this critical issue, facilitating a more precise choice of empiric antibiotic treatment and prevention strategies. This analysis underscores the necessity for prophylactic protocols and therapeutic approaches tailored to the predominant bacterial groups. Further research is needed to explore long-term trends and resistance mechanisms to improve patient management.
期刊介绍：
Evidence of surgical interventions go back to prehistoric times. Since then, the field of surgery has developed into a complex array of specialties and procedures, particularly with the advent of microsurgery, lasers and minimally invasive techniques. The advanced skills now required from surgeons has led to ever increasing specialization, though these still share important fundamental principles.
Frontiers in Surgery is the umbrella journal representing the publication interests of all surgical specialties. It is divided into several “Specialty Sections” listed below. All these sections have their own Specialty Chief Editor, Editorial Board and homepage, but all articles carry the citation Frontiers in Surgery.
Frontiers in Surgery calls upon medical professionals and scientists from all surgical specialties to publish their experimental and clinical studies in this journal. By assembling all surgical specialties, which nonetheless retain their independence, under the common umbrella of Frontiers in Surgery, a powerful publication venue is created. Since there is often overlap and common ground between the different surgical specialties, assembly of all surgical disciplines into a single journal will foster a collaborative dialogue amongst the surgical community. This means that publications, which are also of interest to other surgical specialties, will reach a wider audience and have greater impact.
The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to create a discussion and knowledge platform of advances and research findings in surgical practice today to continuously improve clinical management of patients and foster innovation in this field.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
