Longitudinal OCTA vessel density loss in macula and optic nerve head in healthy, glaucoma suspect and established glaucoma eyes.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jo-Hsuan Wu, Sasan Moghimi, Takashi Nishida, Mohsen Adelpour, Alireza Kamalipour, Gopikasree Gunasegaran, Linda M Zangwill, Robert N Weinreb
{"title":"Longitudinal OCTA vessel density loss in macula and optic nerve head in healthy, glaucoma suspect and established glaucoma eyes.","authors":"Jo-Hsuan Wu, Sasan Moghimi, Takashi Nishida, Mohsen Adelpour, Alireza Kamalipour, Gopikasree Gunasegaran, Linda M Zangwill, Robert N Weinreb","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-325746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To examine longitudinal optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) changes in macula and optic nerve head (ONH) in healthy, glaucoma suspect (GS) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy, GS and POAG eyes from Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study with ≥2 years follow-up and four visits of macular/ONH OCTA imaging were included. Rates of macular wiVD (whole-image vessel density) and ONH wiCD (whole-image capillary density) changes were calculated for each diagnosis group using join mixed-effect modelling. Differences in wiVD/wiCD change rates across diagnoses were examined through pairwise comparison. Relationships of baseline 24-2 visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) with wiVD/wiCD change rates were evaluated for POAG eyes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 36, 57 and 79 eyes (25, 38 and 50 subjects) in healthy, GS and POAG groups, respectively. Rates of wiVD (range:-0.72 to -0.92 %/year) and wiCD (range:-0.28 to -0.66 %/year) loss were different from zero in all groups (p<0.05). The rates of wiCD loss differed across all diagnosis groups (p<0.001), while wiVD change rates did not increase when comparing healthy to GS eyes (p=0.167). Baseline VF MD showed a significant but modest correlation with the rates of both wiVD and wiCD loss (p<0.05), and the correlation with wiCD change rate was slightly stronger (R<sup>2</sup>=0.27 vs 0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In glaucoma, there is earlier microvasculature loss in the ONH than in the macula. Moreover, ONH VD loss shows a slightly stronger association with baseline VF than macular VD. Observing ONH VD loss with OCTA may help to monitor early glaucoma, which should be confirmed by future larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-325746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: To examine longitudinal optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) changes in macula and optic nerve head (ONH) in healthy, glaucoma suspect (GS) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) eyes.

Methods: Healthy, GS and POAG eyes from Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study with ≥2 years follow-up and four visits of macular/ONH OCTA imaging were included. Rates of macular wiVD (whole-image vessel density) and ONH wiCD (whole-image capillary density) changes were calculated for each diagnosis group using join mixed-effect modelling. Differences in wiVD/wiCD change rates across diagnoses were examined through pairwise comparison. Relationships of baseline 24-2 visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) with wiVD/wiCD change rates were evaluated for POAG eyes.

Results: There were 36, 57 and 79 eyes (25, 38 and 50 subjects) in healthy, GS and POAG groups, respectively. Rates of wiVD (range:-0.72 to -0.92 %/year) and wiCD (range:-0.28 to -0.66 %/year) loss were different from zero in all groups (p<0.05). The rates of wiCD loss differed across all diagnosis groups (p<0.001), while wiVD change rates did not increase when comparing healthy to GS eyes (p=0.167). Baseline VF MD showed a significant but modest correlation with the rates of both wiVD and wiCD loss (p<0.05), and the correlation with wiCD change rate was slightly stronger (R2=0.27 vs 0.16).

Conclusions: In glaucoma, there is earlier microvasculature loss in the ONH than in the macula. Moreover, ONH VD loss shows a slightly stronger association with baseline VF than macular VD. Observing ONH VD loss with OCTA may help to monitor early glaucoma, which should be confirmed by future larger studies.

健康眼、疑似青光眼眼和已确诊青光眼眼黄斑和视神经头的纵向 OCTA 血管密度损失。
背景/目的方法:纳入随访时间≥2年、接受过4次黄斑/视神经头OCTA成像检查的健康、疑似青光眼(GS)和原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)眼的黄斑和视神经头的纵向光学相干断层血管成像(OCTA)变化。使用联合混合效应模型计算了每个诊断组的黄斑 wiVD(全像血管密度)和 ONH wiCD(全像毛细血管密度)变化率。通过配对比较检查了不同诊断的 wiVD/wiCD 变化率差异。对 POAG 眼睛的基线 24-2 视野(VF)平均偏差(MD)与 wiVD/wiCD 变化率的关系进行了评估:结果:健康组、GS 组和 POAG 组分别有 36、57 和 79 只眼睛(25、38 和 50 名受试者)。所有组的 wiVD(范围:-0.72 至 -0.92%/年)和 wiCD(范围:-0.28 至 -0.66%/年)损失率均与零不同(P2=0.27 vs 0.16):结论:在青光眼患者中,视网膜上皮的微血管损失早于黄斑。结论:在青光眼患者中,视网膜上部微血管的丧失早于黄斑部。此外,视网膜上部微血管丧失与基线视力的关系比黄斑部微血管丧失稍强。用 OCTA 观察 ONH VD 损失可能有助于监测早期青光眼,这一点应在未来更大规模的研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信