Effect of single parenteral administration of marbofloxacin on bacterial load and selection of resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the fecal microbiota of healthy pigs.
Micaela Miyauchi, Farid El Garch, William Thériault, Bruno G Leclerc, Edith Lépine, Henry Giboin, Mohamed Rhouma
{"title":"Effect of single parenteral administration of marbofloxacin on bacterial load and selection of resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the fecal microbiota of healthy pigs.","authors":"Micaela Miyauchi, Farid El Garch, William Thériault, Bruno G Leclerc, Edith Lépine, Henry Giboin, Mohamed Rhouma","doi":"10.1186/s12917-024-04329-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global concern impacting both humans, animals and their environment. The use of oral antimicrobials in livestock, particularly in pigs, has been identified as a driver in the selection of AMR bacteria. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a single intramuscular (IM) dose of marbofloxacin (8 mg/kg) on Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli populations, as well as on fluoroquinolone resistance within the fecal microbiota of pigs. Twenty healthy pigs, 60-days old, were divided into two groups: a treated group (n = 13) and a control group (n = 7) and were monitored over a 28-day experimental period. Fecal samples were collected from all animals for the isolation of E. coli and Salmonella strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of marbofloxacin for the isolates recovered on MacConkey agar supplemented with 1 or 4 µg/mL of marbofloxacin and for some generic E. coli isolates (recovered from MacConkey agar not supplemented with marbofloxacin) was determined using the broth microdilution method. Genomic DNA was extracted from the confirmed bacterial strains and sequenced using the Sanger method to identify mutations in the quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs) of the gyrA and parC genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The single IM administration of marbofloxacin resulted in a significant decrease in Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli fecal populations from days 1 to 3 post- treatment. No Salmonella isolates were detected in either group, and no marbofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates were identified. The MIC of the selected generic E. coli strains (n = 100) showed an increase to up to 0.5 µg/mL between days 1 and 3 post-treatment but remained below the clinical breakpoint of marbofloxacin resistance (4 µg/mL). Sequencing of these isolates revealed no mutations in gyrA and parC genes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study showed that this dosing regimen of marbofloxacin significantly decreases the fecal shedding of Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli populations in pigs, while limiting the selection of marbofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates. These findings warrant validation in sick pigs to support the selective use of this antibiotic solely in cases of clinical disease, thereby minimizing the reliance on conventional (metaphylactic) group treatments in pigs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9041,"journal":{"name":"BMC Veterinary Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-024-04329-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global concern impacting both humans, animals and their environment. The use of oral antimicrobials in livestock, particularly in pigs, has been identified as a driver in the selection of AMR bacteria. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a single intramuscular (IM) dose of marbofloxacin (8 mg/kg) on Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli populations, as well as on fluoroquinolone resistance within the fecal microbiota of pigs. Twenty healthy pigs, 60-days old, were divided into two groups: a treated group (n = 13) and a control group (n = 7) and were monitored over a 28-day experimental period. Fecal samples were collected from all animals for the isolation of E. coli and Salmonella strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of marbofloxacin for the isolates recovered on MacConkey agar supplemented with 1 or 4 µg/mL of marbofloxacin and for some generic E. coli isolates (recovered from MacConkey agar not supplemented with marbofloxacin) was determined using the broth microdilution method. Genomic DNA was extracted from the confirmed bacterial strains and sequenced using the Sanger method to identify mutations in the quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs) of the gyrA and parC genes.
Results: The single IM administration of marbofloxacin resulted in a significant decrease in Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli fecal populations from days 1 to 3 post- treatment. No Salmonella isolates were detected in either group, and no marbofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates were identified. The MIC of the selected generic E. coli strains (n = 100) showed an increase to up to 0.5 µg/mL between days 1 and 3 post-treatment but remained below the clinical breakpoint of marbofloxacin resistance (4 µg/mL). Sequencing of these isolates revealed no mutations in gyrA and parC genes.
Conclusions: The present study showed that this dosing regimen of marbofloxacin significantly decreases the fecal shedding of Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli populations in pigs, while limiting the selection of marbofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates. These findings warrant validation in sick pigs to support the selective use of this antibiotic solely in cases of clinical disease, thereby minimizing the reliance on conventional (metaphylactic) group treatments in pigs.
期刊介绍:
BMC Veterinary Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of veterinary science and medicine, including the epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of medical conditions of domestic, companion, farm and wild animals, as well as the biomedical processes that underlie their health.