Mapping common and distinct brain correlates among cognitive flexibility tasks: concordant evidence from meta-analyses.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Zhanna V Chuikova, Andrei A Filatov, Andrei Y Faber, Marie Arsalidou
{"title":"Mapping common and distinct brain correlates among cognitive flexibility tasks: concordant evidence from meta-analyses.","authors":"Zhanna V Chuikova, Andrei A Filatov, Andrei Y Faber, Marie Arsalidou","doi":"10.1007/s11682-024-00921-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive flexibility allows individuals to switch between different tasks, strategies, or ideas; an ability that is important for everyday life. The Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST) and task switching paradigm (TSP) are popular measures of cognitive flexibility. Although both tasks require switching, the TSP requires participants to memorize switching rules and retrieve them when they view a cue (rule-retrieval), whereas the classic WCST requires participants to discover the switching rule via trial-and-error (rule-discovery). Many functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have examined brain responses to these tasks. Extant meta-analyses show concordance in activation in a widespread set of areas including frontal, parietal, and cingulate cortices. Critically, past meta-analyses have not specifically examined brain correlates associated with rule derivation (i.e., rule-discovery vs. rule-retrieval) in cognitive flexibility tasks. We examine for the first time common and distinct concordance in brain responses to rule-discovery (i.e., WCST) and rule-retrieval (i.e., TSP), as well as TSP subtypes using quantitative meta-analyses. We analyzed data from 69 eligible articles with a total of 1617 young-adult participants. Conjunction results show concordance in common fronto-parietal areas predominantly in the left hemisphere. Contrast analyses show that rule-discovery required increased involvement in multiple cortical and subcortical regions such as frontopolar (Brodmann Area 10), parietal, insular cortex, thalamus and caudate nucleus predominantly in the right hemisphere. No significant differences in concordance were observed among the three, task switching paradigm sub-types. We propose a neuroanatomical model of cognitive flexibility and discuss theoretical and practical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-024-00921-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility allows individuals to switch between different tasks, strategies, or ideas; an ability that is important for everyday life. The Wisconsin card sorting test (WCST) and task switching paradigm (TSP) are popular measures of cognitive flexibility. Although both tasks require switching, the TSP requires participants to memorize switching rules and retrieve them when they view a cue (rule-retrieval), whereas the classic WCST requires participants to discover the switching rule via trial-and-error (rule-discovery). Many functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have examined brain responses to these tasks. Extant meta-analyses show concordance in activation in a widespread set of areas including frontal, parietal, and cingulate cortices. Critically, past meta-analyses have not specifically examined brain correlates associated with rule derivation (i.e., rule-discovery vs. rule-retrieval) in cognitive flexibility tasks. We examine for the first time common and distinct concordance in brain responses to rule-discovery (i.e., WCST) and rule-retrieval (i.e., TSP), as well as TSP subtypes using quantitative meta-analyses. We analyzed data from 69 eligible articles with a total of 1617 young-adult participants. Conjunction results show concordance in common fronto-parietal areas predominantly in the left hemisphere. Contrast analyses show that rule-discovery required increased involvement in multiple cortical and subcortical regions such as frontopolar (Brodmann Area 10), parietal, insular cortex, thalamus and caudate nucleus predominantly in the right hemisphere. No significant differences in concordance were observed among the three, task switching paradigm sub-types. We propose a neuroanatomical model of cognitive flexibility and discuss theoretical and practical applications.

绘制认知灵活性任务中共同和独特的大脑相关性:来自元分析的一致证据。
认知灵活性使人能够在不同的任务、策略或想法之间切换;这种能力对日常生活非常重要。威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)和任务转换范式(TSP)是衡量认知灵活性的常用方法。虽然这两项任务都需要切换,但 TSP 要求参与者记住切换规则,并在看到提示时检索这些规则(规则检索),而经典的 WCST 则要求参与者通过试错发现切换规则(规则发现)。许多功能性磁共振成像研究都检查了大脑对这些任务的反应。现有的荟萃分析表明,包括额叶、顶叶和扣带回皮层在内的一系列区域的激活具有一致性。重要的是,过去的荟萃分析并没有专门研究认知灵活性任务中与规则推导(即规则发现与规则检索)相关的大脑相关性。我们利用定量荟萃分析首次研究了大脑对规则发现(即 WCST)和规则检索(即 TSP)以及 TSP 亚型的反应的共性和独特一致性。我们分析了 69 篇符合条件的文章中的数据,共涉及 1617 名青少年参与者。连接结果显示,主要在左半球的共同前顶叶区域存在一致性。对比分析表明,规则发现需要更多地涉及多个皮层和皮层下区域,如前额叶(布罗德曼第 10 区)、顶叶、岛叶皮层、丘脑和尾状核,主要集中在右半球。在三种任务转换范式子类型之间,没有观察到明显的一致性差异。我们提出了认知灵活性的神经解剖学模型,并讨论了其理论和实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信