Mapping connection and substitution behaviors between shared E-bicycles and public transportation

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jianhong Ye, Jiahao Bai, Marco Diana
{"title":"Mapping connection and substitution behaviors between shared E-bicycles and public transportation","authors":"Jianhong Ye, Jiahao Bai, Marco Diana","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10550-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The emergence and development of shared E-bicycles (SEB) has resulted in complex connection and substitution relationships with public transportation (PT) in urban areas, impacting the social benefits of integrated transportation systems and the return on investment of PT subsidies. Accurately identifying how SEB complement and/or compete with PT is still a crucial challenge. Therefore, this research proposes a new discrimination method based on multi-source data fusion to address this issue. The method’s discrimination accuracy is evaluated based on both telephone interviews data and transaction data from SEB users in Shenyang City, China. The results indicate that SEB are primarily used for single-mode trips (75%). When SEB are used to combine with other modes, they mainly serve as connecting modes to rail transit (22.1%). On the other hand, shared bicycles (SB) and buses are the two modes most replaced by SEB, followed by private cars and walking. 63% of SEB rides can be accurately classified by the proposed method in terms of their connection and substitution relationship with PT. Incorporating anonymized socioeconomic attribute information from big data holds promise for further enhancing the method’s performance. This research provides key insights for assessing the societal benefits of SEBs on PT, offering valuable theoretical and methodological support for transportation planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10550-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence and development of shared E-bicycles (SEB) has resulted in complex connection and substitution relationships with public transportation (PT) in urban areas, impacting the social benefits of integrated transportation systems and the return on investment of PT subsidies. Accurately identifying how SEB complement and/or compete with PT is still a crucial challenge. Therefore, this research proposes a new discrimination method based on multi-source data fusion to address this issue. The method’s discrimination accuracy is evaluated based on both telephone interviews data and transaction data from SEB users in Shenyang City, China. The results indicate that SEB are primarily used for single-mode trips (75%). When SEB are used to combine with other modes, they mainly serve as connecting modes to rail transit (22.1%). On the other hand, shared bicycles (SB) and buses are the two modes most replaced by SEB, followed by private cars and walking. 63% of SEB rides can be accurately classified by the proposed method in terms of their connection and substitution relationship with PT. Incorporating anonymized socioeconomic attribute information from big data holds promise for further enhancing the method’s performance. This research provides key insights for assessing the societal benefits of SEBs on PT, offering valuable theoretical and methodological support for transportation planning.

Abstract Image

绘制共享电动自行车与公共交通之间的连接和替代行为图
共享电动自行车(SEB)的出现和发展导致了与城市公共交通(PT)之间复杂的连接和替代关系,影响了综合交通系统的社会效益和公共交通补贴的投资回报。准确识别 SEB 如何与公共交通互补和/或竞争仍是一项重要挑战。因此,本研究提出了一种基于多源数据融合的新判别方法来解决这一问题。基于中国沈阳市 SEB 用户的电话访谈数据和交易数据,对该方法的判别准确性进行了评估。结果表明,SEB 主要用于单模式出行(75%)。当共享单车与其他交通方式结合使用时,主要作为轨道交通的接驳交通方式(22.1%)。另一方面,共享单车(SB)和公共汽车是被 SEB 替代最多的两种出行方式,其次是私家车和步行。根据与公共交通的连接和替代关系,63% 的 SEB 骑行可以通过建议的方法准确分类。从大数据中纳入匿名的社会经济属性信息有望进一步提高该方法的性能。这项研究为评估 SEB 对公共交通的社会效益提供了重要见解,为交通规划提供了宝贵的理论和方法支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信