The COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Effects on Mental Health-A before, during, and after Comparison Using the U.S. Census Bureau's Household Pulse Survey.

3区 综合性期刊
Aarnav D Shah, Christina Laternser, Priyamvada Tatachar, Priscilla Duong
{"title":"The COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Effects on Mental Health-A before, during, and after Comparison Using the U.S. Census Bureau's Household Pulse Survey.","authors":"Aarnav D Shah, Christina Laternser, Priyamvada Tatachar, Priscilla Duong","doi":"10.3390/ijerph21101306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although significantly increased mental health concerns were noted globally during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, much less is known about the mental health trends during the COVID-19 recovery period. We aimed to compare current anxiety or depression rates to those before and during the first year of the pandemic and to evaluate demographic differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed Household Pulse Survey data prospectively collected from a representative U.S. population sample. We compared the anxiety or depression rates from the first pandemic year (04/2020-05/2021) and recovery period (06/2023-03/2024) from the national cohort and demographic subgroups using two-sided paired <i>t</i>-tests and regression analyses and compared these to pre-pandemic (01/2019-12/2019) rates using one-sided <i>t</i>-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The national estimates for anxiety or depression improved during the recent COVID-19 recovery period as compared to the first year (29.5 ± 5.5 vs. 37.6 ± 3.1; <i>p</i> < 0.0001) but did not return to the pre-pandemic benchmark (29.5% vs. 10.8%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Higher rates were noted in younger individuals aged 18-29 years (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), in individuals with less than a high school diploma (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), or with disabilities (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Non-Hispanic Asians reported the lowest rates (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and no significant gender differences were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The U.S. population's mental health concerns have improved since the first year of the pandemic but remain above pre-pandemic benchmarks. Certain demographic subgroups are at higher risk, indicating the need for targeted health care and economic policy interventions to address these disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11507479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21101306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although significantly increased mental health concerns were noted globally during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, much less is known about the mental health trends during the COVID-19 recovery period. We aimed to compare current anxiety or depression rates to those before and during the first year of the pandemic and to evaluate demographic differences.

Methods: We analyzed Household Pulse Survey data prospectively collected from a representative U.S. population sample. We compared the anxiety or depression rates from the first pandemic year (04/2020-05/2021) and recovery period (06/2023-03/2024) from the national cohort and demographic subgroups using two-sided paired t-tests and regression analyses and compared these to pre-pandemic (01/2019-12/2019) rates using one-sided t-tests.

Results: The national estimates for anxiety or depression improved during the recent COVID-19 recovery period as compared to the first year (29.5 ± 5.5 vs. 37.6 ± 3.1; p < 0.0001) but did not return to the pre-pandemic benchmark (29.5% vs. 10.8%; p < 0.001). Higher rates were noted in younger individuals aged 18-29 years (p < 0.0001), in individuals with less than a high school diploma (p < 0.0001), or with disabilities (p < 0.0001). Non-Hispanic Asians reported the lowest rates (p < 0.0001), and no significant gender differences were noted.

Conclusion: The U.S. population's mental health concerns have improved since the first year of the pandemic but remain above pre-pandemic benchmarks. Certain demographic subgroups are at higher risk, indicating the need for targeted health care and economic policy interventions to address these disparities.

COVID-19 大流行及其对心理健康的影响--利用美国人口普查局家庭脉搏调查进行的前后比较。
背景:尽管在 COVID-19 大流行的第一年,全球范围内的心理健康问题明显增加,但人们对 COVID-19 恢复期的心理健康趋势却知之甚少。我们的目的是将目前的焦虑或抑郁率与大流行之前和第一年期间的焦虑或抑郁率进行比较,并评估人口统计学差异:我们分析了从具有代表性的美国人口样本中收集的家庭脉搏调查数据。我们使用双侧配对 t 检验和回归分析比较了大流行第一年(2020 年 4 月至 2021 年 5 月)和恢复期(2023 年 6 月至 2024 年 3 月)的全国队列和人口亚群的焦虑或抑郁率,并使用单侧 t 检验将其与大流行前(2019 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月)的焦虑或抑郁率进行了比较:与第一年相比,在最近的 COVID-19 恢复期,焦虑或抑郁的全国估计值有所改善(29.5 ± 5.5 vs. 37.6 ± 3.1;p < 0.0001),但没有恢复到大流行前的基准(29.5% vs. 10.8%;p < 0.001)。18-29 岁的年轻人(p < 0.0001)、高中文凭以下(p < 0.0001)或残疾人士(p < 0.0001)的发病率较高。非西班牙裔亚裔的发病率最低(p < 0.0001),性别差异不明显:结论:自大流行的第一年以来,美国人的心理健康问题有所改善,但仍高于大流行前的基准。某些人口亚群面临的风险更高,这表明有必要采取有针对性的医疗保健和经济政策干预措施来解决这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信