Factors Associated with Multimodal Care Practices for Cancer Cachexia among Pharmacists.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Satomi Okamura, Koji Amano, Saori Koshimoto, Sayaka Arakawa, Hiroto Ishiki, Eriko Satomi, Tatsuya Morita, Takashi Takeuchi, Naoharu Mori, Tomomi Yamada
{"title":"Factors Associated with Multimodal Care Practices for Cancer Cachexia among Pharmacists.","authors":"Satomi Okamura, Koji Amano, Saori Koshimoto, Sayaka Arakawa, Hiroto Ishiki, Eriko Satomi, Tatsuya Morita, Takashi Takeuchi, Naoharu Mori, Tomomi Yamada","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31100457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmacists' roles in cachexia care are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the knowledge and practice of cachexia care and identify factors related to the practice of cachexia care among pharmacists. Information on the knowledge and practice of cachexia care was obtained. Components of practicing multimodal care were evaluated. Participants were categorized into two groups according to practicing multimodal care levels. Comparisons were made between the groups, and multiple regression analysis was employed. Of the 451 pharmacists, 243 responded. They were categorized into the Practicing group (n = 119) and Not practicing group (n = 124). Significant differences were observed for the number of advanced cancer patients/month, frequency of caring for them, and involvement in training programs on cachexia. The Practicing group had significantly better knowledge about cachexia. The Practicing group used guidelines, items, and symptoms more frequently to detect cachexia. The Practicing group tended to detect cachexia and initiate interventions in earlier phases and in patients with a better status. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the most significant factor was the regular provision of care (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.92). The regular provision of care was associated with the practice of multimodal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":"31 10","pages":"6133-6143"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31100457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmacists' roles in cachexia care are unclear. This study aimed to clarify the knowledge and practice of cachexia care and identify factors related to the practice of cachexia care among pharmacists. Information on the knowledge and practice of cachexia care was obtained. Components of practicing multimodal care were evaluated. Participants were categorized into two groups according to practicing multimodal care levels. Comparisons were made between the groups, and multiple regression analysis was employed. Of the 451 pharmacists, 243 responded. They were categorized into the Practicing group (n = 119) and Not practicing group (n = 124). Significant differences were observed for the number of advanced cancer patients/month, frequency of caring for them, and involvement in training programs on cachexia. The Practicing group had significantly better knowledge about cachexia. The Practicing group used guidelines, items, and symptoms more frequently to detect cachexia. The Practicing group tended to detect cachexia and initiate interventions in earlier phases and in patients with a better status. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the most significant factor was the regular provision of care (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.92). The regular provision of care was associated with the practice of multimodal care.

与药剂师对癌症疼痛的多模式护理实践相关的因素。
药剂师在恶病质护理中的作用尚不明确。本研究旨在澄清药剂师对恶病质护理的认识和实践,并确定与恶病质护理实践相关的因素。研究获得了关于恶病质护理知识和实践的信息。评估了多模式护理实践的组成部分。根据多模式护理实践水平将参与者分为两组。组间进行比较,并采用多元回归分析。在 451 名药剂师中,有 243 人做出了回应。他们被分为实践组(119 人)和非实践组(124 人)。在每月晚期癌症患者人数、护理晚期癌症患者的频率以及参与恶病质培训计划方面,观察到了显著差异。实践组对恶病质的了解明显更多。实践组更频繁地使用指南、项目和症状来检测恶病质。实践组倾向于在较早阶段发现恶病质,并对状态较好的患者采取干预措施。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,最重要的因素是定期提供护理(几率比为 2.07;95% 置信区间为 1.10-3.92)。定期提供护理与多模式护理实践有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信