Vaccine hesitancy and routine revaccination among adult HCT survivors in the United States: A convergent mixed methods analysis

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Mihkai M. Wickline , Paul A. Carpenter , Jeffrey R. Harris , Sarah J. Iribarren , Kerryn W. Reding , Kenneth C. Pike , Stephanie J. Lee , Rachel B. Salit , Masumi Ueda Oshima , Phuong T. Vo , Donna L. Berry
{"title":"Vaccine hesitancy and routine revaccination among adult HCT survivors in the United States: A convergent mixed methods analysis","authors":"Mihkai M. Wickline ,&nbsp;Paul A. Carpenter ,&nbsp;Jeffrey R. Harris ,&nbsp;Sarah J. Iribarren ,&nbsp;Kerryn W. Reding ,&nbsp;Kenneth C. Pike ,&nbsp;Stephanie J. Lee ,&nbsp;Rachel B. Salit ,&nbsp;Masumi Ueda Oshima ,&nbsp;Phuong T. Vo ,&nbsp;Donna L. Berry","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) is essential risk mitigation in the prevention of infectious morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, revaccination rates have been shown to be insufficient and to what extent vaccine hesitancy contributes to survivors not becoming fully revaccinated is unknown. We performed a cross-sectional, mixed methods survey-based study to explore how vaccine hesitancy influences revaccination among US adult HCT survivors who were 2 to 8 years after transplant. Participants were asked to complete the Vaccination Confidence Scale (VCS) and open-ended survey items regarding vaccine confidence. The survey response rate was 30 %; among 332 respondents, vaccine confidence was high in 69 %, medium in 20 %, and low in 11 %. On multivariable analysis, four factors associated with high vaccine confidence were: predominantly Democrat zip codes (per 2020 election results), ability to pay for revaccination out of pocket, receipt of pre-HCT adult vaccines, and receipt of COVID-19 vaccines. From 189 participants who also answered open-ended items, 14 themes associated with vaccine confidence were identified and collapsed into 4 categories based on the VCS: Benefits, Harms, Trust, and Other. Merged analysis showed congruence between VCS scores and open-ended survey responses and created a narrative about the relative importance of the constructs when approaching revaccination by vaccine confidence level. These findings significantly expand our knowledge of how vaccine hesitancy influences revaccination uptake among US adult HCT survivors. Population-specific interventions to approach vaccine-hesitant survivors should be developed and tested.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"42 26","pages":"Article 126374"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X24010569","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Revaccination to restore immunity to vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) is essential risk mitigation in the prevention of infectious morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, revaccination rates have been shown to be insufficient and to what extent vaccine hesitancy contributes to survivors not becoming fully revaccinated is unknown. We performed a cross-sectional, mixed methods survey-based study to explore how vaccine hesitancy influences revaccination among US adult HCT survivors who were 2 to 8 years after transplant. Participants were asked to complete the Vaccination Confidence Scale (VCS) and open-ended survey items regarding vaccine confidence. The survey response rate was 30 %; among 332 respondents, vaccine confidence was high in 69 %, medium in 20 %, and low in 11 %. On multivariable analysis, four factors associated with high vaccine confidence were: predominantly Democrat zip codes (per 2020 election results), ability to pay for revaccination out of pocket, receipt of pre-HCT adult vaccines, and receipt of COVID-19 vaccines. From 189 participants who also answered open-ended items, 14 themes associated with vaccine confidence were identified and collapsed into 4 categories based on the VCS: Benefits, Harms, Trust, and Other. Merged analysis showed congruence between VCS scores and open-ended survey responses and created a narrative about the relative importance of the constructs when approaching revaccination by vaccine confidence level. These findings significantly expand our knowledge of how vaccine hesitancy influences revaccination uptake among US adult HCT survivors. Population-specific interventions to approach vaccine-hesitant survivors should be developed and tested.
美国成年 HCT 幸存者对疫苗的犹豫不决和常规再接种:融合混合方法分析。
重新接种疫苗以恢复对疫苗可预防疾病 (VPD) 的免疫力是预防造血细胞移植 (HCT) 后感染性发病率和死亡率的重要风险缓解措施。然而,重新接种率已被证明是不够的,疫苗犹豫不决在多大程度上导致幸存者未能完全重新接种疫苗也是未知数。我们进行了一项横断面混合方法调查研究,探讨疫苗犹豫不决如何影响移植后 2 到 8 年的美国成人 HCT 幸存者重新接种疫苗。我们要求参与者完成疫苗接种信心量表 (VCS) 和有关疫苗接种信心的开放式调查项目。调查回复率为 30%;在 332 名受访者中,疫苗接种信心高的占 69%,中等的占 20%,低的占 11%。通过多变量分析,与疫苗信心高相关的四个因素是:以民主党为主的邮政编码(根据 2020 年选举结果)、自费接种疫苗的能力、接种过 HIVT 前成人疫苗和接种过 COVID-19 疫苗。189 名参与者还回答了开放式项目,从中确定了与疫苗信心相关的 14 个主题,并根据 VCS 分成 4 个类别:益处、危害、信任和其他。合并分析表明,VCS 分数与开放式调查回答之间存在一致性,并根据疫苗信心水平说明了在接种疫苗时各构建要素的相对重要性。这些发现极大地扩展了我们对疫苗犹豫不决如何影响美国成年 HCT 幸存者重新接种的了解。我们应该开发并测试针对特定人群的干预措施,以接近对疫苗犹豫不决的幸存者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信