A comparison of the management and five-year outcomes of patients treated for chronic coronary syndrome between 2006-2007 and 2015-2016 - insights from the PRESAGE registry.
Izabela Kozłowska-Karaca, Piotr Desperak, Mariusz Gąsior, Przemysław Trzeciak
{"title":"A comparison of the management and five-year outcomes of patients treated for chronic coronary syndrome between 2006-2007 and 2015-2016 - insights from the PRESAGE registry.","authors":"Izabela Kozłowska-Karaca, Piotr Desperak, Mariusz Gąsior, Przemysław Trzeciak","doi":"10.5603/cj.100464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Changes in the management of patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) require continuous monitoring of results of treatment in daily clinical practice. The present study contains a comparison of the clinical characteristics, management, and in-hospital and five-year outcomes of patients with CCS enrolled on the Prospective REgistry of Stable AnGina management and trEatment (PRESAGE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of 3475 patients with CCS were selected who underwent coronary angiography and were divided into two groups who were treated in the years 2006-2007 (1300 [37.4%]) - group I, and during 2015-2016 (2175 [62.6%] - group II). The composite endpoints involved death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and acute coronary syndrome-driven revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing patients from group I to those from group II, group I were younger; 61.8 (54.9-68.5) vs. 66.1 (59.7-72.7) years respectively, with a higher incidence of previous MI and percutaneous intervention. Patients from the group II had a higher incidence of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, atrial fibrillation, New York Heart Association class III or more. The incidence of the composite endpoints did not vary significantly between the two groups during the entire period after the index hospitalization, but patients from the group I had a lower mortality rate both within three and five years after discharge (8.5% vs. 10.7, p = 0.03 and 13.2% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients treated during 2006-2007 and 2015-2016 differed in age, clinical characteristics, and comorbidities. The composite endpoint incidence was similar in both groups,butlong-term mortality rates werehigherin the 2015-2016 cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.100464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Changes in the management of patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) require continuous monitoring of results of treatment in daily clinical practice. The present study contains a comparison of the clinical characteristics, management, and in-hospital and five-year outcomes of patients with CCS enrolled on the Prospective REgistry of Stable AnGina management and trEatment (PRESAGE).
Methods: A group of 3475 patients with CCS were selected who underwent coronary angiography and were divided into two groups who were treated in the years 2006-2007 (1300 [37.4%]) - group I, and during 2015-2016 (2175 [62.6%] - group II). The composite endpoints involved death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), and acute coronary syndrome-driven revascularization.
Results: Comparing patients from group I to those from group II, group I were younger; 61.8 (54.9-68.5) vs. 66.1 (59.7-72.7) years respectively, with a higher incidence of previous MI and percutaneous intervention. Patients from the group II had a higher incidence of hypertension, diabetes, obesity, atrial fibrillation, New York Heart Association class III or more. The incidence of the composite endpoints did not vary significantly between the two groups during the entire period after the index hospitalization, but patients from the group I had a lower mortality rate both within three and five years after discharge (8.5% vs. 10.7, p = 0.03 and 13.2% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusions: Patients treated during 2006-2007 and 2015-2016 differed in age, clinical characteristics, and comorbidities. The composite endpoint incidence was similar in both groups,butlong-term mortality rates werehigherin the 2015-2016 cohort.
背景:慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者管理的变化要求在日常临床实践中持续监测治疗效果。本研究比较了稳定型冠状动脉管理和治疗前瞻性登记(Prospective REgistry of Stable AnGina management and trEatment,PRESAGE)中登记的慢性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征、管理、院内和五年预后:选取了3475名接受冠状动脉造影术的CCS患者,将其分为两组,分别在2006-2007年(1300人[37.4%])接受治疗的I组和2015-2016年(2175人[62.6%])接受治疗的II组。综合终点包括死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)和急性冠状动脉综合征导致的血管再通:比较 I 组和 II 组患者,I 组患者更年轻,分别为 61.8(54.9-68.5)岁和 66.1(59.7-72.7)岁,既往心肌梗死和经皮介入治疗的发生率更高。II组患者高血压、糖尿病、肥胖、心房颤动、纽约心脏协会III级或以上的发病率更高。在指数住院后的整个期间,两组患者的综合终点发生率没有显著差异,但I组患者在出院后三年和五年内的死亡率较低(分别为8.5% vs. 10.7,p = 0.03和13.2% vs. 17.9%,p < 0.001):2006-2007年和2015-2016年接受治疗的患者在年龄、临床特征和合并症方面存在差异。两组患者的复合终点发生率相似,但2015-2016年组群的长期死亡率更高。